Liu F, Hu Z-D, Yurkov A, Chen X-H, Bao W-J, Ma Q, Zhao W-N, Pan S, Zhao X-M, Liu J-H, Wang Q-M, Boekhout T
School of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Sciences and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, Hebei, China.
Leibniz Institute DSMZ-German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures, Braunschweig, Germany.
Persoonia. 2024 Aug;52:1-21. doi: 10.3767/persoonia.2024.52.01. Epub 2024 Apr 6.
A correct classification of fungi, including yeasts, is of prime importance to understand fungal biodiversity and to communicate about this diversity. Fungal genera are mainly defined based on phenotypic characteristics and the results of single or multigene-based phylogenetic analyses. However, because yeasts often have less phenotypic characters, their classification experienced a strong move towards DNA-based data, from short ribosomal sequences to multigene phylogenies and more recently to phylogenomics. Here, we explore the usefulness of various genomics-based parameters to circumscribe fungal genera more correctly taking the yeast domain as an example. Therefore, we compared the results of a phylogenomic analysis, average amino acid identity (AAI) values, the presence of conserved signature indels (CSIs), the percentage of conserved proteins (POCP) and the presence-absence patterns of orthologs (PAPO). These genome-based metrics were used to investigate their usefulness in demarcating 13 hitherto relatively well accepted genera in , namely , , , , , , , , , , , and As a result, most of these genera are supported by the genomics-based metrics, but the genera , and were shown to be genetically highly diverse based on the above listed analyses. Considering the results obtained for the presently recognized genera, a range of 80-92 % POCP values and a range of 60-70 % AAI values might be valuable thresholds to discriminate genera in Furthermore, the genus-specific genes identified in the PAPO analysis and the CSIs were found to be useful as synapomorphies to characterize and define genera in . Our results indicate that the combined monophyly-based phylogenomic analysis together with genomic relatedness indices and synapomorphies provide promising approaches to delineating yeast genera and likely those of filamentous fungi as well. The genera , and are revised and we propose eight new genera and 41 new combinations. : Liu F, Hu Z-D, Yurkov A, et al. 2024. Saccharomycetaceae: delinaeation of fungal genera based on phylogenomic analyses, genomic relatedness indices and genomics-based synapomorphies. Persoonia 52: 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2024.52.01.
对包括酵母在内的真菌进行正确分类,对于理解真菌生物多样性以及交流这种多样性至关重要。真菌属主要基于表型特征以及基于单基因或多基因的系统发育分析结果来定义。然而,由于酵母通常具有较少的表型特征,其分类经历了从短核糖体序列到多基因系统发育,以及最近到系统发育基因组学的强烈转变,朝着基于DNA的数据发展。在这里,我们以酵母领域为例,探讨各种基于基因组学的参数在更准确界定真菌属方面的有用性。因此,我们比较了系统发育基因组分析的结果、平均氨基酸同一性(AAI)值、保守特征插入缺失(CSI)的存在情况、保守蛋白百分比(POCP)以及直系同源基因的有无模式(PAPO)。这些基于基因组的指标被用于研究它们在界定13个迄今相对被广泛接受的属方面的有用性,即、、、、、、、、、、、和。结果表明,这些属中的大多数都得到了基于基因组学指标的支持,但基于上述分析,、和属在遗传上表现出高度多样性。考虑到目前公认属所获得的结果,80 - 92%的POCP值范围和60 - 70%的AAI值范围可能是区分酵母属的有价值阈值。此外,在PAPO分析中鉴定出的属特异性基因和CSI被发现可用作共衍征,以表征和定义酵母属。我们的结果表明,基于单系性的系统发育基因组分析与基因组相关性指数和共衍征相结合,为界定酵母属以及可能的丝状真菌属提供了有前景的方法。、和属进行了修订,我们提出了8个新属和41个新组合。:刘F,胡Z - D,尤尔科夫A等。2024。酵母科:基于系统发育基因组分析、基因组相关性指数和基于基因组学的共衍征对真菌属的界定。《佩尔索尼亚》52:1 - 21。https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2024.52.01 。