Suppr超能文献

城市公园 FVC 月际分布及动态变化研究。

A study of spatial distribution and dynamic change in monthly FVC of urban parks.

机构信息

School of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang, China.

Henan Province Engineering Center of Horticultural Plant Resource Utilization and Germplasm Enhancement, Xinxiang, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Aug 23;19(8):e0308805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308805. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

The study on the spatial distribution and dynamic change in monthly Fractional Vegetation Cover (FVC) of parks provides a scientific basis for vegetation management and optimization in urban parks. This research focuses on two comprehensive parks located in Xinxiang, China-People's Park and Harmony Park, using multi-spectral Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) images as the data source and considering monthly periods. Monthly FVC data was obtained using the method of Dimidiate Pixel Model based on the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). The dynamic changes of monthly FVC at regional scale were described through the dynamic changes in the monthly FVC mean and in the FVC areas at various scales, and the dynamic changes in the monthly FVC were analyzed using the coefficient of variation and curve change trends. Furthermore, the dynamic changes in FVC areas at various scales in the parks were analyzed using standard deviation and curve change trends. Subsequently, the differential method was used to analyze the monthly FVC dynamic changes at pixel scale. The results indicate: (1) In terms of the spatial distribution characteristics in monthly FVC of urban parks, both parks exhibit the highest ratio of bare area in January and February. The proportions of FVC for People's Park are 59.17% and 64.46%, while for Harmony Park they are 69.10% and 51.92%, showing the most distinct spatial distribution characteristics. The high and very high coverage areas in each month are mainly distributed on the outskirts of the park, while the medium, medium-low, and low coverage areas are mainly located in the central and middle parts of the park. The overall FVC of the park shows a trend of high coverage on the periphery and low coverage in the center. (2) In the spatial-temporal dynamic change in FVC at regional scale, the average monthly FVC changes exhibit an overall "∩" -shaped pattern. The peak and minimum FVC values for different parks occur at different times. The peak FVC for People's Park appears in August, while for Harmony Park it appears in June, with corresponding FVC values of 0.46 and 0.50, respectively. The minimum FVC for People's Park occurs in February, and for Harmony Park it occurs in January, with FVC values of 0.17 and 0.15, respectively. Among the dynamic change in FVC areas at various scales, the areas of bare and highest-coverage exhibit the greatest fluctuations, with the ascending and descending changes and rates of bare and highest-coverage areas generally showing opposite trends. (3) In terms of the spatial-temporal dynamic changes in FVC at pixel scale in urban parks, overall, FVC shows moderate improvement from February-August, and moderate degradation from January-February and from August-December. The degradation and improvement are primarily slight. The most significant improvement in monthly FVC occurs in March-April, with a predominant type of significant improvement in FVC changes. People's Park and Harmony Park show the most significant degradation in FVC during September-October and October-November, respectively, with a predominant type of significant degradation in FVC changes. During the periods of most significant improvement and degradation in monthly FVC, the spatial distribution of significant improvement and degradation areas primarily occurs in the periphery and middle parts of the parks. FVC in urban parks decreases from January to February and from August to December, while it increases from February to August, with relatively good conditions from June to August. Vegetation optimization should consider: balancing recreational and ecological functions overall, controlling the proportion of bare land, and enhancing the canopy structure of vegetation in low coverage areas or the coverage of hard surfaces; locally increasing the proportion of evergreen plants and moderately increasing planting density. In addition, parks should strengthen management to reduce the impact of flooding and maintain the health of vegetation.

摘要

本研究以中国新乡市的两个综合性公园——人民公园和和谐公园为研究对象,利用多光谱无人机(UAV)图像作为数据源,并考虑到月度周期,研究了公园内月度分数植被覆盖(FVC)的空间分布和动态变化。采用基于归一化植被指数(NDVI)的二分像素模型方法获取月度 FVC 数据。通过月度 FVC 均值和不同尺度 FVC 面积的动态变化,描述了区域尺度上月度 FVC 的动态变化,并通过变异系数和曲线变化趋势分析了月度 FVC 的动态变化。此外,还通过标准差和曲线变化趋势分析了公园内不同尺度 FVC 面积的动态变化。随后,采用差分法分析了像素尺度上的月度 FVC 动态变化。结果表明:(1)在城市公园月度 FVC 的空间分布特征方面,两个公园均表现出 1 月和 2 月裸地比例最高。人民公园的 FVC 比例分别为 59.17%和 64.46%,而和谐公园的 FVC 比例分别为 69.10%和 51.92%,表现出最明显的空间分布特征。各月高和极高覆盖区主要分布在公园的郊区,而中、中低和低覆盖区主要分布在公园的中心和中部。公园的整体 FVC 呈现出外围高覆盖、中心低覆盖的趋势。(2)在区域尺度上 FVC 的时空动态变化方面,平均月度 FVC 变化呈现出整体“∩”形模式。不同公园的 FVC 峰值和最小值出现的时间不同。人民公园的 FVC 峰值出现在 8 月,和谐公园的 FVC 峰值出现在 6 月,对应的 FVC 值分别为 0.46 和 0.50。人民公园的 FVC 最小值出现在 2 月,和谐公园的 FVC 最小值出现在 1 月,对应的 FVC 值分别为 0.17 和 0.15。在不同尺度的 FVC 面积的动态变化中,裸地和最高覆盖面积的波动最大,裸地和最高覆盖面积的上升和下降变化率通常呈现相反的趋势。(3)在城市公园像素尺度上的 FVC 时空动态变化方面,总体而言,FVC 从 2 月到 8 月呈中度改善趋势,从 1 月到 2 月和从 8 月到 12 月呈中度退化趋势。退化和改善主要是轻微的。月度 FVC 的最大改善发生在 3 月至 4 月,FVC 变化的主要类型是显著改善。人民公园和和谐公园的 FVC 在 9 月至 10 月和 10 月至 11 月期间分别表现出最显著的退化,FVC 变化的主要类型是显著退化。在月度 FVC 最大改善和退化期间,显著改善和退化区域的空间分布主要发生在公园的外围和中部。城市公园的 FVC 从 1 月到 2 月和从 8 月到 12 月减少,而从 2 月到 8 月增加,6 月到 8 月的条件相对较好。植被优化应考虑:整体平衡娱乐和生态功能,控制裸地比例,增强低覆盖区或硬表面植被的树冠结构;局部增加常绿植物的比例,适度增加种植密度。此外,公园应加强管理,减少洪水的影响,保持植被的健康。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/205f/11343381/1287ff372e35/pone.0308805.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验