Research Institute against Digestive Cancer (IRCAD), 1 Place de l'Hôpital, 67000, Strasbourg, France.
ICube Laboratory, Photonics Instrumentation for Health, Strasbourg, France.
Surg Endosc. 2024 Nov;38(11):6312-6323. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11030-3. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
Endoscopy is an essential skill for all surgeons. However, endoscopic competency, training, and practice may vary widely among them. The EAES Flexible Endoscopy Subcommittee is working towards a standardized set of fundamental endoscopic knowledge and skills. To best advise on current practice patterns of flexible endoscopy among surgeons worldwide, a snapshot audit was conducted on the training, use, and limitations of flexible endoscopy in practice.
An online survey was distributed via email distribution and social media platforms for EAES, SAGES, and WebSurg members. Respondent demographics, training, and practice patterns were assessed. The main outcome measure was the annual endoscopic volume. Multivariate regression and machine learning models analyzed relationships between outcomes and independent variables of age, geographic region, laparoscopic surgery practice, and surgical specialization.
A total of 1486 surgeons from 195 countries completed the survey. Respondents were mainly general (n = 894/1486, 60.2%), colorectal (n = 189/1486, 12.7%), bariatric (n = 117/1486, 7.9%), upper gastrointestinal (GI)/foregut (n = 108, 7.3%), hepatobiliopancreatic/HPB (n = 59/1486, 4%), and endocrine surgeons (n = 11/1486, 0.7%) in active practice. Eighty-two percent (n = 1,204) mentioned having used endoscopy in their practice, and 64.7% (n = 961/1486) received formal flexible endoscopy training. Of those performing endoscopy annually, 64.2% (n = 660/1486) performed between 0 and 20 endoscopies, 15.2% (n = 156/1486) performed between 20 and 50 endoscopies, 10.1% (n = 104/1486) performed between 50 and 100 endoscopies, and 10.5% (n = 108/1486) performed over 100 endoscopies. From the regression analysis, there was no statistical correlation between the annual endoscopy volume and age, geographic region, laparoscopic surgery practice, or surgical specialization. Performing advanced endoscopy was directly related to the bariatric subspecialty and to performing over 50% of cases in a minimally invasive fashion.
This international snapshot audit revealed significant heterogeneity in endoscopic practices among surgeons worldwide. There was a nonindependent relationship between endoscopy volumes and other variables tested. Barriers to practicing and receiving endoscopy training were common among respondents. The EAES Flexible Endoscopy Subcommittee will consider such results when developing an equitable and effective standardized flexible endoscopy curriculum.
内镜检查对于所有外科医生来说都是一项基本技能。然而,内镜能力、培训和实践在外科医生之间可能存在很大差异。EAES 柔性内镜学小组委员会正在努力制定一套标准化的基本内镜学知识和技能。为了最好地了解全球外科医生在实践中使用柔性内镜的当前模式,我们对柔性内镜的培训、使用和局限性进行了一次抽样审计。
通过电子邮件和社交媒体平台向 EAES、SAGES 和 WebSurg 成员分发在线调查。评估了受访者的人口统计学、培训和实践模式。主要观察指标是内镜年度检查量。多变量回归和机器学习模型分析了年龄、地理位置、腹腔镜手术实践和手术专业化等独立变量与结果之间的关系。
共有来自 195 个国家的 1486 名外科医生完成了调查。受访者主要为普通外科医生(n=894/1486,60.2%)、结直肠外科医生(n=189/1486,12.7%)、减重外科医生(n=117/1486,7.9%)、上消化道/前肠外科医生(n=108/1486,7.3%)、肝胆胰外科医生(n=59/1486,4%)和内分泌外科医生(n=11/1486,0.7%)。82%(n=1,204)的人在实践中使用过内镜,64.7%(n=961/1486)接受过正规的柔性内镜培训。在每年进行内镜检查的医生中,64.2%(n=660/1486)每年进行 0-20 次内镜检查,15.2%(n=156/1486)每年进行 20-50 次内镜检查,10.1%(n=104/1486)每年进行 50-100 次内镜检查,10.5%(n=108/1486)每年进行 100 次以上内镜检查。通过回归分析,内镜年度检查量与年龄、地理位置、腹腔镜手术实践或手术专业化之间没有统计学相关性。进行高级内镜检查与减重外科专业有直接关系,与微创方式进行超过 50%的手术有关。
这项国际抽样审计揭示了全球外科医生内镜实践中的显著异质性。内镜检查量与测试的其他变量之间存在非独立关系。在接受内镜培训和实践方面存在障碍是受访者的共同问题。EAES 柔性内镜学小组委员会将在制定公平有效的标准化柔性内镜课程时考虑到这些结果。