• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加强创伤护理:一种使用XGBoost的机器学习方法,利用国家创伤数据库(NTDB)数据预测紧急出血干预措施

Enhancing Trauma Care: A Machine Learning Approach with XGBoost for Predicting Urgent Hemorrhage Interventions Using NTDB Data.

作者信息

Zhang Jin, Jin Zhichao, Tang Bihan, Huang Xiangtong, Wang Zongyu, Chen Qi, He Jia

机构信息

School of Health Sciences and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200000, China.

Department of Health Statistics, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.

出版信息

Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Jul 30;11(8):768. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11080768.

DOI:10.3390/bioengineering11080768
PMID:39199726
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11352089/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Trauma is a leading cause of death worldwide, with many incidents resulting in hemorrhage before the patient reaches the hospital. Despite advances in trauma care, the majority of deaths occur within the first three hours of hospital admission, offering a very limited window for effective intervention. Unfortunately, a significant increase in mortality from hemorrhagic trauma is primarily due to delays in hemorrhage control. Therefore, we propose a machine learning model to predict the need for urgent hemorrhage intervention.

METHODS

This study developed and validated an XGBoost-based machine learning model using data from the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) from 2017 to 2019. It focuses on demographic and clinical data from the initial hours following trauma for model training and validation, aiming to predict whether trauma patients require urgent hemorrhage intervention.

RESULTS

The XGBoost model demonstrated superior performance across multiple datasets, achieving an AUROC of 0.872 on the training set, 0.869 on the internal validation set, and 0.875 on the external validation set. The model also showed high sensitivity (77.8% on the external validation set) and specificity (82.1% on the external validation set), with an accuracy exceeding 81% across all datasets, highlighting its high reliability for clinical applications.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that the XGBoost model effectively predicts urgent hemorrhage interventions using data from the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB). It outperforms other machine learning algorithms in accuracy and robustness across various datasets. These results highlight machine learning's potential to improve emergency responses and decision-making in trauma care.

摘要

目的

创伤是全球主要的死亡原因之一,许多事故在患者到达医院之前就已导致出血。尽管创伤护理取得了进展,但大多数死亡发生在入院后的头三个小时内,有效干预的窗口期非常有限。不幸的是,出血性创伤死亡率的显著增加主要是由于出血控制的延迟。因此,我们提出了一种机器学习模型来预测紧急出血干预的需求。

方法

本研究使用2017年至2019年国家创伤数据库(NTDB)的数据开发并验证了一种基于XGBoost的机器学习模型。它专注于创伤后最初几小时的人口统计学和临床数据用于模型训练和验证,旨在预测创伤患者是否需要紧急出血干预。

结果

XGBoost模型在多个数据集上表现出卓越的性能,在训练集上的AUROC为0.872,内部验证集上为0.869,外部验证集上为0.875。该模型还显示出高敏感性(外部验证集上为77.8%)和特异性(外部验证集上为82.1%),所有数据集的准确率均超过81%,突出了其在临床应用中的高可靠性。

结论

我们的研究表明,XGBoost模型利用国家创伤数据库(NTDB)的数据有效地预测了紧急出血干预。在各种数据集的准确性和稳健性方面,它优于其他机器学习算法。这些结果凸显了机器学习在改善创伤护理中的应急响应和决策方面的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/330c/11352089/d72d37c482cf/bioengineering-11-00768-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/330c/11352089/8a52b0ed54a1/bioengineering-11-00768-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/330c/11352089/539047336cd0/bioengineering-11-00768-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/330c/11352089/d72d37c482cf/bioengineering-11-00768-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/330c/11352089/8a52b0ed54a1/bioengineering-11-00768-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/330c/11352089/539047336cd0/bioengineering-11-00768-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/330c/11352089/d72d37c482cf/bioengineering-11-00768-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Enhancing Trauma Care: A Machine Learning Approach with XGBoost for Predicting Urgent Hemorrhage Interventions Using NTDB Data.加强创伤护理:一种使用XGBoost的机器学习方法,利用国家创伤数据库(NTDB)数据预测紧急出血干预措施
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Jul 30;11(8):768. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11080768.
2
Predictors of Mortality in Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage: A National Trauma Data Bank Study.创伤性颅内出血患者死亡率的预测因素:一项国家创伤数据库研究
Front Neurol. 2020 Nov 17;11:587587. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.587587. eCollection 2020.
3
The advanced machine learner XGBoost did not reduce prehospital trauma mistriage compared with logistic regression: a simulation study.高级机器学习 XGBoost 并未比逻辑回归更能减少院前创伤分诊错误:一项模拟研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Jun 21;21(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01558-y.
4
Development and validation of a machine learning-based predictive model for assessing the 90-day prognostic outcome of patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.基于机器学习的预测模型评估自发性脑出血患者 90 天预后结局的开发与验证。
J Transl Med. 2024 Mar 4;22(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-04896-3.
5
Real-Time Prediction of Sepsis in Critical Trauma Patients: Machine Learning-Based Modeling Study.重症创伤患者脓毒症的实时预测:基于机器学习的建模研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Mar 31;7:e42452. doi: 10.2196/42452.
6
[Constructing a predictive model for the death risk of patients with septic shock based on supervised machine learning algorithms].基于监督机器学习算法构建脓毒症休克患者死亡风险预测模型
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 Apr;36(4):345-352. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20230930-00832.
7
Illness severity assessment of older adults in critical illness using machine learning (ELDER-ICU): an international multicentre study with subgroup bias evaluation.使用机器学习评估危重症老年患者的疾病严重程度(ELDER-ICU):一项具有亚组偏倚评估的国际多中心研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2023 Oct;5(10):e657-e667. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00128-0. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
8
A Retrospective Cohort Study: Predicting 90-Day Mortality for ICU Trauma Patients with a Machine Learning Algorithm Using XGBoost Using MIMIC-III Database.一项回顾性队列研究:使用MIMIC-III数据库,通过基于XGBoost的机器学习算法预测ICU创伤患者的90天死亡率。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Sep 6;16:2625-2640. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S416943. eCollection 2023.
9
Massive external validation of a machine learning algorithm to predict pulmonary embolism in hospitalized patients.大规模外部验证机器学习算法以预测住院患者的肺栓塞。
Thromb Res. 2022 Aug;216:14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2022.05.016. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
10
Prediction Model of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head After Femoral Neck Fracture: Machine Learning-Based Development and Validation Study.股骨颈骨折后股骨头坏死的预测模型:基于机器学习的开发与验证研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Nov 19;9(11):e30079. doi: 10.2196/30079.

引用本文的文献

1
Introduction to Artificial Intelligence for General Surgeons: A Narrative Review.普通外科医生的人工智能导论:叙述性综述
Cureus. 2025 Mar 1;17(3):e79871. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79871. eCollection 2025 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Machine learning in the prediction of massive transfusion in trauma: a retrospective analysis as a proof-of-concept.机器学习在创伤患者大量输血预测中的应用:一项作为概念验证的回顾性分析。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Jun;50(3):1073-1081. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02423-5. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
2
A decision support system for osteoporosis risk prediction using machine learning and explainable artificial intelligence.一种使用机器学习和可解释人工智能的骨质疏松症风险预测决策支持系统。
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 2;9(12):e22456. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22456. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Trends in using deep learning algorithms in biomedical prediction systems.
生物医学预测系统中深度学习算法的应用趋势。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Nov 9;17:1256351. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1256351. eCollection 2023.
4
Achieving balanced transfusion early in critically bleeding trauma patients: an observational study exploring the effect of attending trauma surgical presence during resuscitation.在严重出血性创伤患者早期实现平衡输血:一项探索复苏期间创伤外科医生在场影响的观察性研究
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2023 Nov 20;8(1):e001160. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001160. eCollection 2023.
5
Lack of regional pathways impact on surgical delay: Analysis of the Orthopaedic Trauma Hospital Outcomes-Patient Operative Delays (ORTHOPOD) study.缺乏区域性途径对手术延迟的影响:矫形创伤医院结果-患者手术延迟(ORTHOPOD)研究分析。
Injury. 2023 Dec;54(12):111007. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.111007. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
6
Damage control surgery: old concepts and new indications.损伤控制外科:旧概念与新指征
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2023 Dec 1;29(6):666-673. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001097. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
7
The enlightening role of explainable artificial intelligence in medical & healthcare domains: A systematic literature review.可解释人工智能在医疗保健领域中的启示作用:系统文献综述。
Comput Biol Med. 2023 Nov;166:107555. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107555. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
8
An Artificial Intelligence Model for Predicting Trauma Mortality Among Emergency Department Patients in South Korea: Retrospective Cohort Study.一种用于预测韩国急诊科创伤患者死亡率的人工智能模型:回顾性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 29;25:e49283. doi: 10.2196/49283.
9
Artificial intelligence and machine learning in prehospital emergency care: A scoping review.院前急救中的人工智能与机器学习:一项范围综述。
iScience. 2023 Jul 17;26(8):107407. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107407. eCollection 2023 Aug 18.
10
Traumatic hemorrhage and chain of survival.创伤性出血与生存链。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023 May 24;31(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13049-023-01088-8.