Chisholm E M, de Dombal F T, Giles G R
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Jun 15;290(6484):1795-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6484.1795.
Self administered questionnaires are becoming popular investigative tools in medical research, yet few reports state the extent of methods used to validate these questionnaires before their general use. A pilot study was therefore carried out to validate a 41 item questionnaire for use in a population screening study for gastrointestinal disease. Participants in the study comprised 69 population controls, 40 patients with benign disease, and 35 patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Acceptability, ease of completion, reliability, and reproducibility of the questionnaire were all assessed. Only one subject refused to complete the questionnaire. Ninety six per cent of the questions were completed by each subject and only one response in 1440 was altered in the reproducibility study. The questionnaire disclosed symptoms similar to those elicited by a clinician and highlighted unreported gastrointestinal symptoms in the control group. Three questions were found to be unreliable and were altered before the questionnaire was put into general use. It is concluded that a pilot study to validate a new questionnaire is simple to perform and necessary to identify unreliable questions.
自行填写的调查问卷正成为医学研究中流行的调查工具,但很少有报告说明在这些调查问卷普遍使用之前用于验证其方法的程度。因此,开展了一项试点研究,以验证一份用于胃肠疾病人群筛查研究的41项调查问卷。该研究的参与者包括69名人群对照、40名良性疾病患者和35名胃肠癌患者。对调查问卷的可接受性、填写的难易程度、可靠性和可重复性进行了评估。只有一名受试者拒绝填写调查问卷。每个受试者完成了96%的问题,在可重复性研究中,1440份回答中只有一份被更改。该调查问卷所揭示的症状与临床医生引出的症状相似,并突出了对照组中未报告的胃肠症状。发现有三个问题不可靠,在调查问卷普遍使用之前进行了修改。得出的结论是,验证一份新调查问卷的试点研究操作简单,对于识别不可靠问题是必要的。