Suppr超能文献

深度学习算法利用腹部CT诊断腰椎中央管狭窄的可行性

Feasibility of deep learning algorithm in diagnosing lumbar central canal stenosis using abdominal CT.

作者信息

Jeon Yejin, Kim Bo Ram, Choi Hyoung In, Lee Eugene, Kim Da-Wit, Choi Boorym, Lee Joon Woo

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82 Gumi-ro, 173 Beon-Gil, Bundang-Gu, Seongnam-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, 13620, Republic of Korea.

Coreline Soft Co. Ltd., World-Cup Bukro 6-Gil, Mapogu, Seoul, 03991, Korea.

出版信息

Skeletal Radiol. 2025 May;54(5):947-957. doi: 10.1007/s00256-024-04796-z. Epub 2024 Sep 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop a deep learning algorithm for diagnosing lumbar central canal stenosis (LCCS) using abdominal CT (ACT) and lumbar spine CT (LCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study involved 109 patients undergoing LCTs and ACTs between January 2014 and July 2021. The dural sac on CT images was manually segmented and classified as normal or stenosed (dural sac cross-sectional area ≥ 100 mm or < 100 mm, respectively). A deep learning model based on U-Net architecture was developed to automatically segment the dural sac and classify the central canal stenosis. The classification performance of the model was compared on a testing set (990 images from 9 patients). The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of automatic segmentation were quantitatively evaluated by comparing its Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with those of manual segmentation.

RESULTS

In total, 990 CT images from nine patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 77 ± 7 years; six men) were evaluated. The algorithm achieved high segmentation performance with a DSC of 0.85 ± 0.10 and ICC of 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.80,0.85). The ICC between ACTs and LCTs on the deep learning algorithm was 0.89 (95%CI: 0.87,0.91). The accuracy of the algorithm in diagnosing LCCS with dichotomous classification was 84%(95%CI: 0.82,0.86). In dataset analysis, the accuracy of ACTs and LCTs was 85%(95%CI: 0.82,0.88) and 83%(95%CI: 0.79,0.86), respectively. The model showed better accuracy for ACT than LCT.

CONCLUSION

The deep learning algorithm automatically diagnosed LCCS on LCTs and ACTs. ACT had a diagnostic performance for LCCS comparable to that of LCT.

摘要

目的

开发一种利用腹部CT(ACT)和腰椎CT(LCT)诊断腰椎中央管狭窄(LCCS)的深度学习算法。

材料与方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了2014年1月至2021年7月期间接受LCT和ACT检查的109例患者。对CT图像上的硬膜囊进行手动分割,并分类为正常或狭窄(硬膜囊横截面积分别≥100mm或<100mm)。开发了一种基于U-Net架构的深度学习模型,以自动分割硬膜囊并对中央管狭窄进行分类。在测试集(来自9例患者的990张图像)上比较了该模型的分类性能。通过将自动分割的骰子相似系数(DSC)和组内相关系数(ICC)与手动分割的进行比较,定量评估自动分割的准确性、敏感性和特异性。

结果

总共评估了9例患者的990张CT图像(平均年龄±标准差,77±7岁;6名男性)。该算法实现了较高的分割性能,DSC为0.85±0.10,ICC为0.82(95%置信区间[CI]:0.80,0.85)。深度学习算法中ACT和LCT之间的ICC为0.89(95%CI:0.87,0.91)。该算法在二分类诊断LCCS中的准确性为84%(95%CI:0.82,0.86)。在数据集分析中,ACT和LCT的准确性分别为85%(95%CI:0.82,0.88)和83%(95%CI:0.79,0.86)。该模型对ACT的诊断准确性优于LCT。

结论

深度学习算法可在LCT和ACT上自动诊断LCCS。ACT对LCCS的诊断性能与LCT相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9777/11953181/2ea81b68fcdb/256_2024_4796_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验