Wynes Seth, Davis Steven J, Dickau Mitchell, Ly Susan, Maibach Edward, Rogelj Joeri, Zickfeld Kirsten, Matthews H Damon
Department of Geography, Planning & Environment, Concordia University, Montréal, QC Canada.
Department of Geography and Environmental Management, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON Canada.
Commun Earth Environ. 2024;5(1):498. doi: 10.1038/s43247-024-01661-8. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) employs emission scenarios to explore a range of future climate outcomes but refrains from assigning probabilities to individual scenarios. However, IPCC authors have their own views on the likelihood of different climate outcomes, which are valuable to understand because authors possess both expert insight and considerable influence. Here we report the results of a survey of 211 IPCC authors about the likelihood of four key climate outcomes. We found that most authors are skeptical that warming will be limited to the Paris targets of well below 2 °C, but are more optimistic that net zero CO emissions will be reached during the second half of this century. When asked about the beliefs of their peers, author responses showed strong correlations between personal and peer beliefs, suggesting that participants with extreme beliefs perceive their own estimates as closer to the community average than they actually are.
政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)采用排放情景来探索一系列未来气候结果,但不对单个情景赋予概率。然而,IPCC的作者们对不同气候结果的可能性有自己的看法,了解这些看法很有价值,因为作者们既有专业见解又有相当大的影响力。在此,我们报告了一项对211名IPCC作者进行的关于四种关键气候结果可能性的调查结果。我们发现,大多数作者对升温将限制在远低于2°C的巴黎目标持怀疑态度,但对在本世纪下半叶实现净零碳排放更为乐观。当被问及他们同行的看法时,作者的回答显示出个人看法与同行看法之间有很强的相关性,这表明持有极端看法的参与者认为他们自己的估计比实际情况更接近群体平均水平。