• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症烧伤患者脓毒症及脓毒症相关死亡率的预测因素:单中心三级医疗中心经验

Predictors of Sepsis and Sepsis-related Mortality in Critically Ill Burn Patients: A Single Tertiary Care Center Experience.

作者信息

Alqirnas Muhannad Q, Jarman Yazeed A, Almosa Abdulaziz S, Alharbi Shaden S, Alhamadh Moustafa S, Qasim Salman S, Alhusainan Hanan

机构信息

From the College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Sep 18;12(9):e6180. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006180. eCollection 2024 Sep.

DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000006180
PMID:39296606
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11410318/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical diagnosis of sepsis is challenging, emphasizing the importance of regular bacterial surveillance, and tailored antimicrobial therapy. This study aims to elucidate the predictors of sepsis in critically ill burn patients.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients admitted to the burn intensive care unit between 2016 and 2022. Demographics, type of burn, total body surface area (TBSA), presence of inhalation injury, mortality, sepsis, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, cultures, and laboratory findings were collected. Descriptive statistics and survival analysis were used to analyze trends during the 7-year period.

RESULTS

The study encompassed 196 participants. Among patient factors, men constituted 73.4% (n = 102) of those without sepsis and 86.0% (n = 49) with sepsis, with an association between sepsis and lower age (34 versus 41 years) as well as larger TBSA (41.1% versus 17.3%). Inhalation injury was a significant predictor of sepsis [35.1% (n = 20) versus 11.6% (n = 16)]. Mortality was higher in sepsis cases [17.5% (n = 10) versus 2.9% (n = 4)], as well as positive blood cultures [47.4% (n = 27) versus 2.2% (n = 3)], positive wound cultures [71.9% (n = 41) versus 12.2% (n = 17)], and positive fungal cultures [12.3% (n = 7) versus 0% (n = 0)]. Multivariable analysis identified age and TBSA as significant predictors of sepsis ( = 0.025, < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Age, TBSA affected emerge as a strong risk factor for sepsis among critically ill burn patients. It underscores the need for vigilant monitoring to improve outcomes and reduce sepsis-related mortality.

摘要

背景

脓毒症的临床诊断具有挑战性,这凸显了定期进行细菌监测以及针对性抗菌治疗的重要性。本研究旨在阐明重症烧伤患者发生脓毒症的预测因素。

方法

对2016年至2022年间入住烧伤重症监护病房的患者进行回顾性分析。收集了人口统计学资料、烧伤类型、全身表面积(TBSA)、吸入性损伤的存在情况、死亡率、脓毒症、深静脉血栓形成、肺栓塞、肺炎、培养结果以及实验室检查结果。采用描述性统计和生存分析来分析这7年期间的趋势。

结果

该研究纳入了196名参与者。在患者因素方面,男性在非脓毒症患者中占73.4%(n = 102),在脓毒症患者中占86.0%(n = 49),脓毒症与较低年龄(34岁对41岁)以及较大的TBSA(41.1%对17.3%)之间存在关联。吸入性损伤是脓毒症的一个重要预测因素[35.1%(n = 20)对11.6%(n = 16)]。脓毒症病例的死亡率更高[17.5%(n = 10)对2.9%(n = 4)],血培养阳性率也更高[47.4%(n = 27)对2.2%(n = 3)],伤口培养阳性率更高[71.9%(n = 41)对12.2%(n = 17)],真菌培养阳性率更高[12.3%(n = 7)对0%(n = 0)]。多变量分析确定年龄和TBSA是脓毒症的重要预测因素( = 0.025, < 0.001)。

结论

年龄、TBSA是重症烧伤患者发生脓毒症的强烈危险因素。这强调了需要进行 vigilant 监测以改善预后并降低脓毒症相关死亡率。

注

原文中“vigilant”翻译为“警惕的”,这里直接保留英文是因为原文可能有误,推测应该是“vigilant”,按正确理解翻译为“警惕的”更合适,但按要求不添加解释,所以保留英文。

相似文献

1
Predictors of Sepsis and Sepsis-related Mortality in Critically Ill Burn Patients: A Single Tertiary Care Center Experience.重症烧伤患者脓毒症及脓毒症相关死亡率的预测因素:单中心三级医疗中心经验
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Sep 18;12(9):e6180. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006180. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Long term mortality in critically ill burn survivors.重症烧伤幸存者的长期死亡率。
Burns. 2017 Sep;43(6):1155-1162. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
3
Characteristics of bloodstream infection and initial antibiotic use in critically ill burn patients and their impact on patient prognosis.危重症烧伤患者血流感染特征及初始抗菌药物使用对患者预后的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 22;12(1):20105. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24492-z.
4
Incidence and predictors of perioperative atrial fibrillation in burn intensive care unit patients following burn surgery.烧伤重症监护病房烧伤手术后患者围术期心房颤动的发生率及预测因素。
Burns. 2022 Aug;48(5):1092-1096. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2022.04.012. Epub 2022 May 10.
5
A prospective analysis of risk factors for pediatric burn mortality at a tertiary burn center in North India.印度北部一家三级烧伤中心儿童烧伤死亡率危险因素的前瞻性分析。
Burns Trauma. 2017 Sep 20;5:30. doi: 10.1186/s41038-017-0095-7. eCollection 2017.
6
[Epidemiological characteristics and risk factors of sepsis development and death in patients with extremely severe burns].[特重度烧伤患者脓毒症发生及死亡的流行病学特征与危险因素]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Yu Chuang Mian Xiu Fu Za Zhi. 2023 Jun 20;39(6):558-564. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220806-00336.
7
Ten year experience of burn, trauma, and combined burn/trauma injuries comparing outcomes.烧伤、创伤及烧伤/创伤复合伤十年经验对比结果
J Trauma. 2004 Oct;57(4):696-700; dicussion 700-1. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000140480.50079.a8.
8
Full thickness genital burns independently increase the odds of death among pediatric burn patients.全层生殖器烧伤会独立增加小儿烧伤患者的死亡几率。
J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Apr;16(2):220.e1-220.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.01.011. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
9
The outcome of fungal infections in a burn intensive care unit: a study of 172 patients.烧伤重症监护病房真菌感染的结局:一项对172例患者的研究。
Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2020 Jun 30;33(2):101-106.
10
Clinical outcomes after burns in elderly patients over 70 years: A 17-year retrospective analysis.70岁以上老年患者烧伤后的临床结局:一项17年的回顾性分析。
Burns. 2018 Feb;44(1):65-69. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.09.018. Epub 2017 Oct 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of the abbreviated burn severity index with mortality in severely burned patients: A meta-analysis.简化烧伤严重程度指数与严重烧伤患者死亡率的关联:一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 20;20(2):e0319199. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319199. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting Mortality in Burn Patients: Literature Review of Risk Factors for Burn Mortality and Application in Scoring Systems.预测烧伤患者的死亡率:烧伤死亡率危险因素的文献综述及其在评分系统中的应用
Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2023 Mar 31;36(1):3-10. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
Assessment of bacterial profile, antimicrobial susceptibility status, and associated factors of isolates among hospitalized patients at Dessie Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Northeast Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚东北部德西综合专科医院住院患者的细菌谱评估、抗菌药物敏感性状况及分离株的相关因素。
BMC Microbiol. 2024 Apr 4;24(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12866-024-03224-5.
3
Big data insights into the diagnostic values of CBC parameters for sepsis and septic shock in burn patients: a retrospective study.烧伤患者脓毒症和感染性休克的 CBC 参数的大数据洞察:一项回顾性研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 8;14(1):800. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50695-z.
4
The clinical differentiation of blood culture-positive and -negative sepsis in burn patients: a retrospective cohort study.烧伤患者血培养阳性与阴性脓毒症的临床鉴别:一项回顾性队列研究。
Burns Trauma. 2023 Dec 18;11:tkad031. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkad031. eCollection 2023.
5
Survival and analysis of prognostic factors for severe burn patients with inhalation injury: based on the respiratory SOFA score.严重烧伤合并吸入性损伤患者的预后因素分析及生存研究:基于呼吸 SOFA 评分。
BMC Emerg Med. 2023 Jan 5;23(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00767-6.
6
Epidemiology of bloodstream infections and surface swab cultures in burn patients.烧伤患者血流感染及创面拭子培养的流行病学
Acute Med Surg. 2022 May 8;9(1):e752. doi: 10.1002/ams2.752. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
7
Sepsis in Burns-Lessons Learnt from Developments in the Management of Septic Shock.烧伤脓毒症——从脓毒性休克治疗进展中得到的教训。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Dec 24;58(1):26. doi: 10.3390/medicina58010026.
8
Epidemiology and outcomes of bloodstream infections in severe burn patients: a six-year retrospective study.严重烧伤患者血流感染的流行病学和结局:一项六年回顾性研究。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2021 Jun 30;10(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s13756-021-00969-w.
9
The pathogenesis and diagnosis of sepsis post burn injury.烧伤后脓毒症的发病机制与诊断
Burns Trauma. 2021 Feb 4;9:tkaa047. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkaa047. eCollection 2021 Jan.
10
Biofilm Formation in : Genotype-Phenotype Correlation.生物膜形成的基因型-表型相关性。
Molecules. 2019 May 14;24(10):1849. doi: 10.3390/molecules24101849.