• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国大都市区社会经济特征对主动出行的影响及其对健康不平等的作用。

The influence of socioeconomic characteristics on active travel in US metropolitan areas and the contribution to health inequity.

作者信息

Younkin Samuel, Fremont Henry, Bratburd Jennifer, De Los Santos Daritza, Patz Jonathan

机构信息

Global Health Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53726, USA.

Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53726, USA.

出版信息

Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Aug 5;8:266. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19147.2. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19147.2
PMID:39329112
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11425035/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of chronic disease in the US adult population varies across socioeconomic groups in the USA where approximately six in 10 adults have a chronic condition. Walking or cycling reduces the risk to many of these diseases and is influenced by the built environment, accessibility, and safety.

METHODS

We performed multivariate logistic and linear regression on the Health-Oriented Transportation model parameters using the 2009 and 2017 US National Household Transportation surveys, restricted to adults in major metropolitan areas. Model covariates included socioeconomic and environmental characteristics.

RESULTS

Using odds ratios (OR) adjusted for model covariates, we observe several significant variables in 2009 and 2017. Residents of households with no cars were more likely to walk or cycle than those with two cars; OR=5.4 (4.8, 6.0). Residents of households in a census block with population density greater than 2,5000 persons/square mile were more likely to walk or cycle than those with a population density of 2000-3999; OR=2.6 (2.3, 2.8). Individuals with a graduate or professional degree were more likely to walk or cycle than those with a high school degree; OR=2.1 (1.9, 2.2). Individuals that self-report as Black or African American, or Asian are less likely to walk or cycle than White; OR=0.60 (0.56, 0.66), OR=0.70 (0.65, 0.75). The proportional increase in all-cause mortality from estimated reductions in physical activity for African American, Asian, and Hispanic populations were 1.0%, 0.7%, 0.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Access to automobiles and the surrounding population density are primary factors in the decision to walk or cycle. After adjusting for these and other factors, members of low-income, low-education, Black or African American, and Asian populations in US metropolitan areas are less likely to walk or cycle than high-income, high-education, or White populations and the discrepancy in physical activity is likely to contribute to health inequity.

摘要

背景

美国成年人群体中慢性病的患病率在不同社会经济群体间存在差异,约十分之六的成年人患有慢性病。步行或骑自行车可降低患多种此类疾病的风险,且受建成环境、可达性和安全性的影响。

方法

我们使用2009年和2017年美国国家家庭交通调查,对以健康为导向的交通模型参数进行多变量逻辑回归和线性回归,研究对象限于主要大都市地区的成年人。模型协变量包括社会经济和环境特征。

结果

使用经模型协变量调整后的比值比(OR),我们在2009年和2017年观察到几个显著变量。无车家庭的居民比有两辆车家庭的居民更有可能步行或骑自行车;OR = 5.4(4.8,6.0)。人口密度大于2500人/平方英里的普查街区家庭的居民比人口密度为2000 - 3999人/平方英里的家庭居民更有可能步行或骑自行车;OR = 2.6(2.3,2.8)。拥有研究生或专业学位的个体比拥有高中学位的个体更有可能步行或骑自行车;OR = 2.1(1.9,2.2)。自我报告为黑人或非裔美国人或亚洲人的个体比白人步行或骑自行车的可能性更小;OR = 0.60(0.56,0.66),OR = 0.70(0.65,0.75)。非裔美国人、亚洲人和西班牙裔人群因估计的体力活动减少导致的全因死亡率的比例增加分别为1.0%、0.7%、0.8%。

结论

汽车的可获得性和周边人口密度是决定步行或骑自行车的主要因素。在对这些及其他因素进行调整后,美国大都市地区低收入、低教育水平、黑人或非裔美国人以及亚洲人群比高收入、高教育水平或白人人群步行或骑自行车的可能性更小,体力活动方面的差异可能导致健康不平等。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d35d/11425039/125e7ac59d92/wellcomeopenres-8-25092-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d35d/11425039/2e6b850aefd8/wellcomeopenres-8-25092-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d35d/11425039/9413263e1289/wellcomeopenres-8-25092-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d35d/11425039/125e7ac59d92/wellcomeopenres-8-25092-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d35d/11425039/2e6b850aefd8/wellcomeopenres-8-25092-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d35d/11425039/9413263e1289/wellcomeopenres-8-25092-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d35d/11425039/125e7ac59d92/wellcomeopenres-8-25092-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
The influence of socioeconomic characteristics on active travel in US metropolitan areas and the contribution to health inequity.美国大都市区社会经济特征对主动出行的影响及其对健康不平等的作用。
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Aug 5;8:266. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19147.2. eCollection 2023.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Active travel to work in NSW: trends over time and the effect of social advantage.新南威尔士州的主动通勤上班情况:长期趋势及社会优势的影响
Health Promot J Austr. 2014 Dec;25(3):167-73. doi: 10.1071/HE14004.
4
Telehealth Usage Among Low-Income Racial and Ethnic Minority Populations During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Observational Study.新冠疫情期间低收入少数族裔人群的远程医疗使用情况:回顾性观察研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 12;25:e43604. doi: 10.2196/43604.
5
An Analysis of the Health Effects of Physical Activity due to Active Travel Policies in Rennes, France.法国雷恩积极出行政策对身体活动健康影响的分析。
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Aug 19;9:154. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.20917.2. eCollection 2024.
6
Identifying built environmental patterns using cluster analysis and GIS: relationships with walking, cycling and body mass index in French adults.利用聚类分析和 GIS 识别建成环境模式:与法国成年人的步行、骑行和身体质量指数的关系。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 May 23;9:59. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-59.
7
Walk, Bicycle, and Transit Trips of Transit-Dependent and Choice Riders in the 2009 United States National Household Travel Survey.2009 年美国国家住户出行调查中的依赖公交出行者和自主选择出行者的步行、自行车和公交出行。
J Phys Act Health. 2015 Aug;12(8):1139-47. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2014-0052. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
8
Socioeconomic and regional differences in active transportation in Brazil.巴西主动出行的社会经济和地区差异。
Rev Saude Publica. 2016 Jun 27;50. doi: 10.1590/S1518-8787.2016050006126.
9
The contribution of travel-related urban zones, cycling and pedestrian networks and green space to commuting physical activity among adults - a cross-sectional population-based study using geographical information systems.与出行相关的城市区域、自行车和行人网络以及绿地对成年人通勤体力活动的贡献——一项基于人群的横断面研究,采用地理信息系统
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 11;16(1):760. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3264-x.
10
Effects of residence and race on burden of travel for care: cross sectional analysis of the 2001 US National Household Travel Survey.居住地和种族对就医出行负担的影响:对2001年美国国家家庭旅行调查的横断面分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Mar 9;7:40. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-40.

引用本文的文献

1
An Analysis of the Health Effects of Physical Activity due to Active Travel Policies in Rennes, France.法国雷恩积极出行政策对身体活动健康影响的分析。
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Aug 19;9:154. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.20917.2. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Temporal Trends in Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Multimorbidity Prevalence in the United States, 1999-2018.1999 年至 2018 年美国多种疾病患病率的种族和民族差异的时间趋势。
Am J Med. 2022 Sep;135(9):1083-1092.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2022.04.010. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
2
Trends in Poor Health Indicators Among Black and Hispanic Middle-aged and Older Adults in the United States, 1999-2018.美国黑人和西班牙裔中老年人群不良健康指标的变化趋势,1999-2018 年。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2025134. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25134.
3
The Built Environment as a Determinant of Physical Activity: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies and Natural Experiments.
《作为身体活动决定因素的建成环境:纵向研究和自然实验的系统综述》。
Ann Behav Med. 2018 Feb 17;52(3):239-251. doi: 10.1093/abm/kax043.
4
Active Transportation Surveillance - United States, 1999-2012.积极交通监测 - 美国,1999-2012 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Aug 28;64(7):1-17.
5
Health impact assessment of active transportation: A systematic review.主动出行的健康影响评估:一项系统综述。
Prev Med. 2015 Jul;76:103-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.04.010. Epub 2015 Apr 18.
6
Leisure time physical activity and mortality: a detailed pooled analysis of the dose-response relationship.休闲时间身体活动与死亡率:剂量反应关系的详细汇总分析
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jun;175(6):959-67. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0533.
7
Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Differences in Physical Activity.体育活动中的种族、民族和性别差异。
J Hum Cap. 2013 Winter;7(4):378-410. doi: 10.1086/671200.
8
Walking for Transportation and Leisure Among U.S. Adults--National Health Interview Survey 2010.美国成年人以步行作为出行及休闲方式——2010年国家健康访谈调查
J Phys Act Health. 2015 Jun 16;12 Suppl 1(0 1):S62-9. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2013-0519.
9
Prevention of chronic disease in the 21st century: elimination of the leading preventable causes of premature death and disability in the USA.21 世纪预防慢性病:消除美国可导致过早死亡和残疾的主要可预防原因。
Lancet. 2014 Jul 5;384(9937):45-52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60648-6. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
10
Walking and cycling in the United States, 2001-2009: evidence from the National Household Travel Surveys.2001-2009 年美国的步行和自行车出行:国家住户出行调查的证据。
Am J Public Health. 2011 Dec;101 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S310-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.300067. Epub 2011 May 6.