Pióro Weronika, Antoszewski Bogusław, Kasielska-Trojan Anna
Contour Clinic (Private Practice), Ul. Legnicka 55/UA 5, 54-203 Wrocław, Poland.
Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery Clinic, Institute of Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, 90-419 Lodz, Poland.
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 22;13(18):5613. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185613.
The purpose of this paper is to report the case of a patient who developed a local allergic reaction to the pigment used for permanent eyebrow makeup. In addition, the authors' protocol for the treatment of such a complication is proposed. A patient visited the clinic to remove permanent eyebrow makeup. In the patient's opinion, the eyebrows were too dark and incorrectly shaped. Upon physical examination of the brows, they were found to be over-pigmented and drawn outside the area of hair growth of the natural brow. The patient underwent 24 treatment procedures to remove the pigmentation including four sessions of laser therapy and subsequent treatments using a chemical substance (remover). No adverse effects occurred during the initial phase of makeup removal (black pigment removal), but an allergic reaction appeared with the removal of the red-orange colored pigment (after the fourth laser therapy session). The following symptoms appeared: redness, swelling, and the appearance of papules filled with both serous fluid and pigment used for the permanent makeup. After each remover treatment, the allergic reaction decreased, and local symptoms gradually subsided. Additionally, topical corticosteroid treatment was implemented peri-procedurally. The patient's case suggests a secondary allergic reaction to the red-orange pigment used for permanent makeup. The literature on this topic is scarce; therefore, we present a regimen for the management of such complications. In addition, we draw attention to the fact that allergic reactions to pigment may not always occur immediately following skin pigmentation but may become apparent long after the procedure, such as when the allergen is "exposed" during an attempt to remove or correct the makeup.
本文旨在报告一例对永久性纹眉所用色素产生局部过敏反应的患者病例。此外,还提出了作者针对此类并发症的治疗方案。一名患者前往诊所要求去除永久性纹眉。在患者看来,眉毛颜色太深且形状不佳。对眉毛进行体格检查时,发现色素沉着过度,超出了自然眉毛的毛发生长区域。该患者接受了24次去除色素的治疗程序,包括4次激光治疗以及随后使用化学物质(去除剂)的治疗。在最初的纹眉去除阶段(去除黑色色素)未出现不良反应,但在去除红橙色色素(第四次激光治疗后)时出现了过敏反应。出现了以下症状:发红、肿胀,以及出现充满浆液和永久性纹眉所用色素的丘疹。每次使用去除剂治疗后,过敏反应减轻,局部症状逐渐消退。此外,在治疗过程中实施了局部皮质类固醇治疗。该患者的病例提示对永久性纹眉所用红橙色色素产生了继发性过敏反应。关于这一主题的文献较少;因此,我们提出了一种针对此类并发症的处理方案。此外,我们提请注意,对色素的过敏反应并非总是在皮肤色素沉着后立即发生,而是可能在操作很久之后才显现出来,比如在试图去除或修正纹眉时“暴露”过敏原的情况下。