Suppr超能文献

富血小板血浆、非交联透明质酸及富血小板血浆联合非交联透明质酸治疗分束 CO2 激光治疗烧伤瘢痕患者的疗效、安全性和满意度评估:一项随机对照临床试验。

Evaluation of the efficacy, safety and satisfaction rates of platelet-rich plasma, non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid and the combination of platelet-rich plasma and non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid in patients with burn scars treated with fractional CO laser: A randomized controlled clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Rasool Akram Medical Complex Clinical Research Development Center (RCRDC), School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran.

Skin and Stem Cell Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Int Wound J. 2024 Oct;21(10):e70065. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70065.

Abstract

Skin scarring can result from burns, injuries, stretch marks and acne, leading to cosmetic and functional difficulties. Treatments for burn scars encompass a range of options, such as lasers, corticosteroid injections, surgery and regenerative techniques such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP). Hyaluronic acid-based products offer skin hydration and shield against aging effects. A study is being conducted to evaluate how effective PRP injection, hyaluronic acid and their combination improve burn scars and their effects on quality of life and potential disabilities. In our study, PRP and non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid treatments were compared in 10 individuals with burn scars between 2022 and 2023. Patients received CO fractional laser treatment followed by injections in scar areas. Evaluations included the Vancouver scar scale (VSS), biometric assessments, ultrasounds and satisfaction ratings. Two therapy sessions were conducted at 1-month interval, and assessments were done before treatment, 1 month after the first session, and 3 months after the first session. Biometric assessments showed significant improvements in various parameters (tewametry, corneometry, erythema index, melanin index, cutometry, thickness and density) in the intervention groups compared to the placebo group (p <0.05). PRP-non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid, PRP and non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid treatments exhibited the best clinical responses with significant differences between groups (p <0.05). Dermal thickness did not show significant improvement during treatment sessions, and changes among subjects were not significantly different. The colorimetry parameter improved in all groups except the placebo group, with no significant difference between intervention groups. The VSS significantly decreased in all treatment groups except the placebo group. PRP, non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid and especially the combination of these two treatment options are very effective in treating burn scars.

摘要

皮肤疤痕可由烧伤、创伤、妊娠纹和痤疮引起,导致美容和功能困难。烧伤疤痕的治疗方法包括一系列选择,如激光、皮质类固醇注射、手术和再生技术,如富含血小板的血浆 (PRP)。透明质酸基产品提供皮肤保湿并防止老化影响。目前正在进行一项研究,以评估 PRP 注射、透明质酸及其组合对烧伤疤痕的有效性,以及对生活质量和潜在残疾的影响。在我们的研究中,在 2022 年至 2023 年期间,对 10 名烧伤疤痕患者进行了 PRP 和非交联透明质酸治疗的比较。患者接受 CO 分束激光治疗,然后在疤痕区域注射。评估包括温哥华疤痕量表 (VSS)、生物计量评估、超声和满意度评分。两次治疗间隔为 1 个月,在治疗前、第一次治疗后 1 个月和第一次治疗后 3 个月进行评估。生物计量评估显示,干预组在各种参数(经皮水分损失、角质层水分含量、红斑指数、黑色素指数、皮肤电容、厚度和密度)方面均有显著改善,与安慰剂组相比差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。PRP-非交联透明质酸、PRP 和非交联透明质酸治疗组的临床反应最好,组间差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。真皮厚度在治疗期间没有显著改善,且受试者之间的变化无显著差异。除安慰剂组外,所有组的颜色参数均有改善,干预组之间无显著差异。VSS 在除安慰剂组外的所有治疗组中均显著降低。PRP、非交联透明质酸,特别是这两种治疗方法的联合治疗,对烧伤疤痕的治疗非常有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/460d/11447842/24d51b621f98/IWJ-21-e70065-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验