Waidelich Paul, Batibeniz Fulden, Rising James, Kikstra Jarmo S, Seneviratne Sonia I
Climate Finance and Policy Group, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Nat Clim Chang. 2024;14(6):592-599. doi: 10.1038/s41558-024-01990-8. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
Estimates of global economic damage from climate change assess the effect of annual temperature changes. However, the roles of precipitation, temperature variability and extreme events are not yet known. Here, by combining projections of climate models with empirical dose-response functions translating shifts in temperature means and variability, rainfall patterns and extreme precipitation into economic damage, we show that at +3 C global average losses reach 10% of gross domestic product, with worst effects (up to 17%) in poorer, low-latitude countries. Relative to annual temperature damage, the additional impacts of projecting variability and extremes are smaller and dominated by interannual variability, especially at lower latitudes. However, accounting for variability and extremes when estimating the temperature dose-response function raises global economic losses by nearly two percentage points and exacerbates economic tail risks. These results call for region-specific risk assessments and the integration of other climate variables for a better understanding of climate change impacts.
气候变化对全球经济损失的评估是基于年度温度变化的影响。然而,降水、温度变率和极端事件的作用尚不清楚。在此,通过将气候模型预测与经验剂量反应函数相结合,将温度均值和变率、降雨模式和极端降水的变化转化为经济损失,我们发现,全球平均气温上升3摄氏度时,损失将达到国内生产总值的10%,在较贫穷的低纬度国家影响最为严重(高达17%)。相对于年度温度造成的损失,预测变率和极端事件的额外影响较小,且以年际变率为主,尤其是在低纬度地区。然而,在估计温度剂量反应函数时考虑变率和极端事件,会使全球经济损失增加近两个百分点,并加剧经济尾部风险。这些结果呼吁进行区域特定的风险评估,并整合其他气候变量,以更好地理解气候变化的影响。