Farkas Natalia, Kramar John A
Theiss Research, 7411 Eads Ave, La Jolla, CA 92037.
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899.
J Nanopart Res. 2021 May;23(5). doi: 10.1007/s11051-021-05220-6.
Dynamic light scattering (DLS) is an essential technique for nanoparticle size analysis and has been employed extensively for decades, but despite its long history and popularity, the choice of weighting and mean of the size distribution often appears to be picked ad-hoc to bring the results into agreement with other methods and expectations . Here, we critically discuss the application of DLS for nanoparticle characterization and provide much-needed clarification for ambiguities in the mean-value practice of commercial DLS software and documentary standards. We address the misleading way DLS size distributions are often presented, that is, as a logarithmically-scaled histogram of measured relative quantities. Central values obtained incautiously from this representation often lead to significant interpretation errors. Through the measurement of monomodal nanoparticle samples having an extensive range of sizes (5 nm to 250 nm) and polydispersity, we similarly demonstrate that the default outputs of a frequently-used DLS inversion method are ill chosen, as they are regularizer-dependent and significantly deviate from the cumulant z-average size. The resulting discrepancies are typically larger than 15 % depending on the polydispersity index of the samples. We explicitly identify and validate the harmonic mean as the central value of the intensity-weighted DLS size distribution that expresses the inversion results consistently with the cumulant results. We also investigate the extent to which the DLS polydispersity descriptors are representative of the distributional quality and find them to be unreliable and misleading, both for monodisperse reference materials and broad-distribution biomedical nanoparticles. These results overall are intended to bring essential improvements and to stimulate reexamination of the metrological capabilities and role of DLS in nanoparticle characterization.
动态光散射(DLS)是纳米颗粒尺寸分析的一项重要技术,数十年来已被广泛应用。然而,尽管其历史悠久且广受欢迎,但在选择尺寸分布的加权方式和均值时,往往显得比较随意,只是为了使结果与其他方法及预期相符。在此,我们批判性地讨论DLS在纳米颗粒表征中的应用,并针对商业DLS软件的均值计算方法和文献标准中的模糊之处给出急需的澄清。我们指出了DLS尺寸分布通常呈现的误导性方式,即作为测量相对量的对数缩放直方图。从这种表示中不谨慎地获得的中心值常常会导致重大的解释错误。通过测量一系列尺寸范围广泛(5纳米至250纳米)且具有多分散性的单峰纳米颗粒样品,我们同样证明了一种常用的DLS反演方法的默认输出选择不当,因为它们依赖于正则化参数,并且与累积量z平均尺寸有显著偏差。根据样品的多分散指数,由此产生的差异通常大于15%。我们明确确定并验证了调和均值作为强度加权DLS尺寸分布的中心值,它能使反演结果与累积量结果一致地表示出来。我们还研究了DLS多分散性描述符在多大程度上能够代表分布质量,发现它们对于单分散参考材料和宽分布生物医学纳米颗粒而言都是不可靠且具有误导性的。总体而言,这些结果旨在带来必要的改进,并促使人们重新审视DLS在纳米颗粒表征中的计量能力和作用。