Faculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Salaya, Thailand.
Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Maharjgunj Medical Campus, T.U. Institute of Medicine, Maharajganj, Nepal.
Musculoskeletal Care. 2024 Dec;22(4):e1952. doi: 10.1002/msc.1952.
INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVE: The STarT Back Screening Tool (SBST) stratifies low back pain (LBP) patients based on their risk of chronicity to guide treatment accordingly. The absence of its validated Nepali version limits stratified LBP care in Nepal. The study aimed to translate and cross-culturally adapt the SBST into Nepali and evaluate its measurement properties in adults with LBP.
The measurement properties of the Nepali SBST were evaluated in 102 Nepali adults with non-specific LBP. We assessed content validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct and discriminant validity. Item redundancy was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha (α > 0.90), test-retest reliability using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Cohen's kappa using established cutoffs score for categorising patients into risk groups, construct validity using hypothesis testing (if a minimum of 75% of the hypotheses were supported), and discriminant validity using Area Under the Curve (AUC) with the reference scales administered at baseline.
Cronbach's alpha scores were 0.72 for the overall scale and 0.66 for the psychosocial subscale. Test-retest reliability values were good to excellent with ICC of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.87-0.97) for the overall scale and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.73-0.94) for the psychosocial subscale and Kappa values of 0.68 (95% CI: 0.43-0.93) for the overall scale and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.52-1.00) for psychosocial subscale. Construct validity was confirmed as 100% of a priori hypotheses were met. Acceptable discriminative validity was observed with reference scales with AUCs (0.75-0.80).
Nepali SBST demonstrates the reliability and validity of screening for chronicity risk in Nepali adults with LBP. Future studies should evaluate its responsiveness, predictive abilities, and effectiveness in stratifying LBP patients in the Nepalese context.
简介/目的:STarT 回溯筛选工具(SBST)根据慢性风险对低背痛(LBP)患者进行分层,以进行相应的治疗。其经过验证的尼泊尔语版本的缺失限制了尼泊尔对分层 LBP 的护理。本研究旨在将 SBST 翻译成尼泊尔语并对其进行跨文化适应性评估,并评估其在 LBP 成人中的测量特性。
对 102 名患有非特异性 LBP 的尼泊尔成年人评估了尼泊尔 SBST 的测量特性。我们评估了内容有效性、内部一致性、测试-重测可靠性、结构和判别有效性。使用 Cronbach's alpha(α>0.90)评估项目冗余,使用 ICC 评估测试-重测可靠性,使用既定的分类患者进入风险组的截断分数评估 Cohen's kappa,使用假设检验评估结构有效性(如果至少 75%的假设得到支持),使用参考量表在基线时进行评估的曲线下面积(AUC)评估判别有效性。
总体量表的 Cronbach's alpha 评分为 0.72,心理社会量表的 Cronbach's alpha 评分为 0.66。测试-重测可靠性值良好至优秀,ICC 为 0.94(95%CI:0.87-0.97),心理社会量表为 0.87(95%CI:0.73-0.94),Kappa 值为 0.68(95%CI:0.43-0.93),心理社会量表为 0.79(95%CI:0.52-1.00)。结构有效性得到确认,100%的先验假设得到满足。与参考量表的 AUC(0.75-0.80)观察到可接受的判别有效性。
尼泊尔 SBST 证明了其在尼泊尔 LBP 成人中筛查慢性风险的可靠性和有效性。未来的研究应该评估其在尼泊尔背景下对 LBP 患者分层的反应性、预测能力和有效性。