Effects of different orthokeratology lens designs on slowing axial length elongation in children with myopia.

AIM

To elucidate whether differences exist in the impact on retarding the elongation of axial length (AL) among children with myopia when utilizing orthokeratology (ortho-k) lenses employing the corneal refractive therapy (CRT) design versus those employing the vision shaping treatment (VST) design.

METHODS

This retrospective clinical trial aimed to collect and analyze AL data from individuals who wore ortho-k lenses for three years. A total of 654 subjects were enrolled and prescribed one of the three specific brands of ortho-k lenses: CRT, Euclid, and Mouldway. The study's primary focus was to compare the rates of AL elongation and myopic progression across these three brands of ortho-k lenses.

RESULTS

In the 3-year follow-up, the AL elongation exhibited variations of 0.73±0.36 mm in the CRT lens group, 0.59±0.37 mm in the Euclid lens group, and 0.63±0.38 mm in the Mouldway lens group. A noteworthy disparity emerged between the CRT and Mouldway groups (<0.01), as well as between the CRT and Euclid groups (<0.001). Additionally, it was observed that 32.1% of participants who wore CRT lenses experienced a decelerated progression of myopia, in contrast to 47.2% in the Euclid group and 44.4% in the Mouldway group. Statistical analyses revealed a statistically significant distinction between the CRT and Euclid groups (<0.01), and similarly, the CRT group demonstrated a statistically significant difference when compared to the Mouldway group (<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Ortho-k lenses represent a pragmatic strategy for mitigating the advancement of myopia. In contradistinction to ortho-k lenses utilizing the CRT design, those employing the VST design exhibited a more favorable impact regarding retarding AL elongation.