• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

联邦香烟消费税变化对吸烟及健康的影响

Smoking and health implications of a change in the federal cigarette excise tax.

作者信息

Warner K E

出版信息

JAMA. 1986 Feb 28;255(8):1028-32.

PMID:3945014
Abstract

Cigarette excise tax changes ultimately influence the health of smokers and potential smokers. An 8-cent decrease in the federal tax is estimated to induce up to 1 million young persons, ages 12 to 25 years, to smoke, when without the tax decrease they would not. Hundreds of thousands of Americans older than 25 years would also start or continue smoking as a result of the tax decrease. Conversely, an 8- to 16-cent tax increase would encourage from 1 to 2 million young persons and 800,000 to 1.5 million adults to quit smoking or not to start. Thus, a tax increase could prevent hundreds of thousands of premature smoking-related deaths, while a tax decrease would contribute to the disease burden of tobacco. Intentionally or inadvertently, the federal cigarette excise tax is a powerful tool of public health policy.

摘要

香烟消费税的变化最终会影响吸烟者和潜在吸烟者的健康。据估计,联邦税每降低8美分,就会诱使多达100万年龄在12至25岁的年轻人开始吸烟,而如果不减税,他们原本不会吸烟。减税还会导致数十万25岁以上的美国人开始吸烟或继续吸烟。相反,每提高8至16美分的税收,将促使100万至200万年轻人以及80万至150万成年人戒烟或不再开始吸烟。因此,提高税收可以预防数十万与吸烟相关的过早死亡,而降低税收则会加重烟草造成的疾病负担。有意或无意地,联邦香烟消费税都是公共卫生政策的有力工具。

相似文献

1
Smoking and health implications of a change in the federal cigarette excise tax.联邦香烟消费税变化对吸烟及健康的影响
JAMA. 1986 Feb 28;255(8):1028-32.
2
State cigarette excise taxes - United States, 2009.州香烟消费税-美国,2009 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010 Apr 9;59(13):385-8.
3
U.S. tobacco taxes: behavioural effects and policy implications.美国烟草税:行为影响及政策含义。
Br J Addict. 1989 Oct;84(10):1217-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1989.tb00717.x.
4
The consequences of tobacco tax on household health and finances in rich and poor smokers in China: an extended cost-effectiveness analysis.烟草税对中、低收入烟民家庭健康和经济状况的影响:一项扩展的成本效益分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Apr;3(4):e206-16. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)70095-1. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
5
The public health benefit of increasing tobacco taxes in New York State.纽约州提高烟草税对公众健康的益处。
N Y State J Med. 1990 Apr;90(4):174-5.
6
Federal and state cigarette excise taxes - United States, 1995-2009.1995 - 2009年美国联邦和州香烟消费税
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009 May 22;58(19):524-7.
7
A simulation model to predict the fiscal and public health impact of a change in cigarette excise taxes.一种用于预测香烟消费税变化对财政和公共卫生影响的仿真模型。
Tob Control. 2010 Feb;19(1):31-6. doi: 10.1136/tc.2008.028779. Epub 2009 Oct 21.
8
Stuck in Neutral: Stalled Progress in Statewide Comprehensive Smoke-Free Laws and Cigarette Excise Taxes, United States, 2000-2014.停滞不前:2000 - 2014年美国全州综合无烟法律和香烟消费税进展停滞
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Jun 16;13:E80. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.150409.
9
The recent and projected public health and economic benefits of cigarette taxation in Greece.希腊香烟税近期及预计的公共卫生和经济效益。
Tob Control. 2014 Sep;23(5):452-4. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050857. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
10
Cigarette smoking before and after an excise tax increase and an antismoking campaign--Massachusetts, 1990-1996.消费税上调与反吸烟运动前后的吸烟情况——马萨诸塞州,1990 - 1996年
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1996 Nov 8;45(44):966-70.

引用本文的文献

1
Injury news coverage, relative concern, and support for alcohol-control policies: an impersonal impact explanation.伤害新闻报道、相关关注度及对酒精控制政策的支持:一种非个人影响的解释
J Health Commun. 2015;20(1):51-9. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2014.906523. Epub 2014 May 28.
2
Marshaling the evidence for greater regulation and control of tobacco products: A call for action.为加强烟草产品监管和控制而整合证据:行动呼吁。
Ann Behav Med. 1995 Mar;17(1):3-14. doi: 10.1007/BF02888801.
3
Health economists, tobacco control and international development: On the economisation of global health beyond neoliberal structural adjustment policies.
健康经济学家、烟草控制与国际发展:论新自由主义结构调整政策之外的全球健康经济化
Biosocieties. 2013 Jun;8(2):205-228. doi: 10.1057/biosoc.2013.3.
4
The role of research in international tobacco control.研究在国际烟草控制中的作用。
Am J Public Health. 2005 Jun;95(6):976-84. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.046904.
5
Comprehensive tobacco control policies and the smoking behaviour of Canadian adults.全面的烟草控制政策与加拿大成年人的吸烟行为。
Tob Control. 2001 Dec;10(4):317-22. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.4.317.
6
Simulated effect of tobacco tax variation on population health in California.加利福尼亚州烟草税变化对人口健康的模拟影响。
Am J Public Health. 2001 Feb;91(2):239-44. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.2.239.
7
State and federal revenues from tobacco consumed by minors.来自未成年人消费烟草的州和联邦税收。
Am J Public Health. 1999 Jul;89(7):1106-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.7.1106.
8
The economics of smoking: an overview of the international and New Zealand literature.吸烟的经济学:国际及新西兰文献综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 1993 Jun;3(6):462-70. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199303060-00006.
9
Risk perception, addiction, and costs to others: an assessment of cigarette taxes and other anti-smoking policies.风险认知、成瘾性及对他人造成的代价:对香烟税及其他反吸烟政策的评估
Health Care Anal. 1994 Feb;2(1):13-22. doi: 10.1007/BF02251331.
10
The report of the Surgeon General: preventing tobacco use among young people.美国卫生局局长报告:预防年轻人吸烟
Am J Public Health. 1994 Apr;84(4):543-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.4.543.