Suppr超能文献

气候与健康:共同资助的战略途径?

Climate and health: a path to strategic co-financing?

机构信息

Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1H9SH, UK.

Social Cohesion, Health and Wellbeing group, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg 2361, Austria.

出版信息

Health Policy Plan. 2024 Nov 18;39(Supplement_2):i4-i18. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czae044.

Abstract

Leveraging the co-benefits of investments in health and climate can be best achieved by moving away from isolated financing approaches and adopting co-financing strategies, which aim to improve the outcomes of both sectors. We propose a framework for studying co-financing for health and climate that considers the degree of integration between sector funding, and whether arrangements are 'passive', when cross-sectoral goals are indirectly affected, or 'strategic', when they are pre-emptively supported to build resilience and sustainability. We conducted a rigorous, evidence-focused review to describe co-financing mechanisms according to a framework, including the context in which they have been employed, and to identify enablers and barriers to implementation. We searched the international literature using Pubmed and Web of Science from 2013 to 2023, the websites of key health and climate agencies for grey literature and consulted with stakeholders. Our review underscores the significant impact of climate change and related hazards on government, health insurance and household health-related costs. Current evidence primarily addresses passive co-financing, reflecting the financial consequences of inaction. Strategic co-financing is under explored, as are integrative co-financing models demanding cross-sectoral coordination. Current instances of strategic co-financing lack sufficient funding to demonstrate their effectiveness. Climate finance, an under used resource for health, holds potential to generate additional revenue for health. Realizing these advantages necessitates co-benefit monitoring to align health, climate mitigation and adaptation goals, alongside stronger advocacy for the economic and environmental benefits of health investments. Strategic co-financing arrangements are vital at all system levels, demanding increased cross-sectoral collaboration, additional funding and skills for climate integration within health sector plans and budgets, and mainstreaming health into climate adaptation and mitigation plans. Supporting persistent health needs post-disasters, promoting adaptive social protection for health and climate risks, and disseminating best practices within and among countries are crucial, supported by robust evaluations to enhance progress.

摘要

利用卫生和气候投资的共同效益,最好是通过摆脱孤立的供资办法和采用共同供资战略来实现,这些战略旨在改善这两个部门的成果。我们提出了一个用于研究卫生和气候共同供资的框架,该框架考虑了部门供资之间的融合程度,以及安排是"被动的",即跨部门目标间接受影响,还是"战略性的",即预先支持以建立弹性和可持续性。我们进行了严格的、以证据为重点的审查,根据框架描述共同供资机制,包括它们被采用的背景,并确定实施的推动因素和障碍。我们使用 Pubmed 和 Web of Science 从 2013 年到 2023 年搜索国际文献,在关键卫生和气候机构的网站上搜索灰色文献,并与利益攸关方协商。我们的审查强调了气候变化和相关危害对政府、医疗保险和家庭与健康相关费用的重大影响。目前的证据主要涉及被动共同供资,反映了不采取行动的财政后果。战略共同供资的研究不足,跨部门协调的综合共同供资模式也是如此。目前的战略共同供资实例缺乏足够的资金来证明其有效性。气候资金是卫生领域未充分利用的资源,有潜力为卫生部门增加收入。要实现这些优势,就需要进行共同效益监测,使卫生、气候缓解和适应目标保持一致,并大力宣传卫生投资的经济和环境效益。战略共同供资安排在所有系统层面都至关重要,需要增加跨部门合作、为卫生部门计划和预算中的气候融合提供更多资金和技能,并将卫生纳入气候适应和缓解计划的主流。在灾害后支持持续的卫生需求、促进适应卫生和气候风险的社会保护以及在国家内部和国家之间传播最佳做法,都是至关重要的,需要进行强有力的评估以促进进展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a711/11959176/e8e8c5e96cad/czae044f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验