Columbia Center for Children's Environmental Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City, NY, USA.
School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Environ Res. 2022 Dec;215(Pt 3):114165. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.114165. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
Assessments of health and environmental effects of clean air and climate policies have revealed substantial health benefits due to reductions in air pollution, but have included few pediatric outcomes or assessed benefits at the neighborhood level.
We estimated benefits across a suite of child health outcomes in 42 New York City (NYC) neighborhoods under the proposed regional Transportation and Climate Initiative. We also estimated their distribution across racial/ethnic and socioeconomic groups.
We estimated changes in ambient fine particulate matter (PM) and nitrogen dioxide (NO) concentrations associated with on-road emissions under nine different predefined cap-and-invest scenarios. Health outcomes, including selected adverse birth, respiratory, and neurodevelopmental outcomes, were estimated using a program similar to the U.S. EPA BenMAP program. We stratified the associated monetized benefits across racial/ethnic and socioeconomic groups.
The benefits varied widely over the different cap-and-investment scenarios. For a 25% reduction in carbon emissions from 2022 to 2032 and a strategy prioritizing public transit investments, NYC would have an estimated 48 fewer medical visits for childhood asthma, 13,000 avoided asthma exacerbations not requiring medical visits, 640 fewer respiratory illnesses unrelated to asthma, and 9 avoided adverse birth outcomes (infant mortality, preterm birth, and term low birth weight) annually, starting in 2032. The total estimated annual avoided costs are $22 million. City-wide, Black and Hispanic children would experience 1.7 times the health benefits per capita than White and Non-Hispanic White children, respectively. Under the same scenario, neighborhoods experiencing the highest poverty rates in NYC would experience about 2.5 times the health benefits per capita than the lowest poverty neighborhoods.
A cap-and-invest strategy to reduce carbon emissions from the transportation sector could provide substantial health and monetized benefits to children in NYC through reductions in criteria pollutant concentrations, with greater benefits among Black and Hispanic children.
评估清洁空气和气候政策对健康和环境的影响,发现由于减少了空气污染,对健康有很大的益处,但很少包括儿科结果或评估邻里层面的益处。
我们在拟议的区域交通和气候倡议下,估计了 42 个纽约市(NYC)街区中一系列儿童健康结果的收益。我们还估计了它们在种族/族裔和社会经济群体中的分布情况。
我们估计了在 9 种不同的预定义上限和投资情景下,与道路排放相关的环境细颗粒物(PM)和二氧化氮(NO)浓度的变化。使用类似于美国环保局 BenMAP 计划的程序来估计健康结果,包括选定的不良出生、呼吸和神经发育结果。我们将相关的货币化效益划分为种族/族裔和社会经济群体。
不同的上限和投资情景之间的效益差异很大。对于 2022 年至 2032 年减少 25%的碳排放和优先考虑公共交通投资的战略,纽约市预计每年将减少 48 次儿童哮喘的医疗就诊,减少 13000 次无需医疗就诊的哮喘恶化,减少 640 次与哮喘无关的呼吸道疾病,每年减少 9 次不良出生结果(婴儿死亡率、早产和足月低出生体重),从 2032 年开始。估计每年避免的总成本为 2200 万美元。全市范围内,黑人和西班牙裔儿童的人均健康效益将是白人和非西班牙裔白人儿童的 1.7 倍。在相同的情景下,纽约市贫困率最高的社区的人均健康效益将是贫困率最低的社区的 2.5 倍。
减少交通部门碳排放的上限和投资策略可以通过降低标准污染物浓度,为纽约市的儿童提供大量的健康和货币化效益,其中黑人和西班牙裔儿童的效益更大。