• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

X/Twitter 与新冠大流行期间的处方行为之间的关联:回顾性生态研究。

Association Between X/Twitter and Prescribing Behavior During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Ecological Study.

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.

School of Information Sciences, Center for Health Informatics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Ubana-Champaign, IL, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Infodemiology. 2024 Nov 18;4:e56675. doi: 10.2196/56675.

DOI:10.2196/56675
PMID:39556417
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11612580/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Social media has become a vital tool for health care providers to quickly share information. However, its lack of content curation and expertise poses risks of misinformation and premature dissemination of unvalidated data, potentially leading to widespread harmful effects due to the rapid and large-scale spread of incorrect information.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to determine whether social media had an undue association with the prescribing behavior of hydroxychloroquine, using the COVID-19 pandemic as the setting.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we gathered the use of hydroxychloroquine in 48 hospitals in the United States between January and December 2020. Social media data from X/Twitter was collected using Brandwatch, a commercial aggregator with access to X/Twitter's data, and focused on mentions of "hydroxychloroquine" and "Plaquenil." Tweets were categorized by sentiment (positive, negative, or neutral) using Brandwatch's sentiment analysis tool, with results classified by date. Hydroxychloroquine prescription data from the National COVID Cohort Collaborative for 2020 was used. Granger causality and linear regression models were used to examine relationships between X/Twitter mentions and prescription trends, using optimum time lags determined via vector auto-regression.

RESULTS

A total of 581,748 patients with confirmed COVID-19 were identified. The median daily number of positive COVID-19 cases was 1318.5 (IQR 1005.75-1940.3). Before the first confirmed COVID-19 case, hydroxychloroquine was prescribed at a median rate of 559 (IQR 339.25-728.25) new prescriptions per day. A day-of-the-week effect was noted in both prescriptions and case counts. During the pandemic in 2020, hydroxychloroquine prescriptions increased significantly, with a median of 685.5 (IQR 459.75-897.25) per day, representing a 22.6% rise from baseline. The peak occurred on April 2, 2020, with 3411 prescriptions, a 397.6% increase. Hydroxychloroquine mentions on X/Twitter peaked at 254,770 per day on April 5, 2020, compared to a baseline of 9124 mentions per day before January 21, 2020. During this study's period, 3,823,595 total tweets were recorded, with 10.09% (n=386,115) positive, 37.87% (n=1,448,030) negative, and 52.03% (n=1,989,450) neutral sentiments. A 1-day lag was identified as the optimal time for causal association between tweets and hydroxychloroquine prescriptions. Univariate analysis showed significant associations across all sentiment types, with the largest impact from positive tweets. Multivariate analysis revealed only neutral and negative tweets significantly affected next-day prescription rates.

CONCLUSIONS

During the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a significant association between X/Twitter mentions and the number of prescriptions of hydroxychloroquine. This study showed that X/Twitter has an association with the prescribing behavior of hydroxychloroquine. Clinicians need to be vigilant about their potential unconscious exposure to social media as a source of medical knowledge, and health systems and organizations need to be more diligent in identifying expertise, source, and quality of evidence when shared on social media platforms.

摘要

背景

社交媒体已成为医疗保健提供者快速分享信息的重要工具。然而,由于缺乏内容策划和专业知识,存在错误信息和未经证实的数据过早传播的风险,由于错误信息的快速和大规模传播,可能会导致广泛的有害影响。

目的

我们旨在确定社交媒体是否与羟氯喹的处方行为有不当关联,以 COVID-19 大流行作为背景。

方法

在这项回顾性研究中,我们收集了美国 48 家医院 2020 年 1 月至 12 月期间羟氯喹的使用情况。使用 Brandwatch 从 X/Twitter 收集社交媒体数据,Brandwatch 是一家商业聚合商,可访问 X/Twitter 的数据,并重点关注“羟氯喹”和“氯喹”的提及。使用 Brandwatch 的情感分析工具对推文进行情感分类(积极、消极或中性),并根据日期对结果进行分类。使用 2020 年国家 COVID 队列协作的羟氯喹处方数据。使用向量自回归确定的最佳时滞,使用格兰杰因果关系和线性回归模型来检验 X/Twitter 提及与处方趋势之间的关系。

结果

共确定了 581748 例确诊 COVID-19 患者。每日确诊 COVID-19 病例的中位数为 1318.5(IQR 1005.75-1940.3)。在首例确诊 COVID-19 病例之前,羟氯喹的处方率中位数为每天 559(IQR 339.25-728.25)。在日期间存在一周中各天的影响,病例数和羟氯喹的处方均有记录。在 2020 年大流行期间,羟氯喹的处方显著增加,中位数为每天 685.5(IQR 459.75-897.25),与基线相比增加了 22.6%。峰值出现在 2020 年 4 月 2 日,有 3411 张处方,增长了 397.6%。与 2020 年 1 月 21 日之前每天 9124 次的提及相比,X/Twitter 上羟氯喹的提及量在 2020 年 4 月 5 日达到了每天 254770 次的峰值。在此研究期间,共记录了 3823595 条推文,其中 10.09%(n=386115)为积极推文,37.87%(n=1448030)为消极推文,52.03%(n=1989450)为中性推文。确定 1 天的滞后时间是推文和羟氯喹处方之间因果关系的最佳时间。单变量分析显示,所有情感类型都存在显著关联,其中积极推文的影响最大。多变量分析显示,只有中性和消极推文对次日的处方率有显著影响。

结论

在 COVID-19 大流行的第一年,X/Twitter 上的提及与羟氯喹处方数量之间存在显著关联。这项研究表明,X/Twitter 与羟氯喹的处方行为有关。临床医生需要警惕他们可能无意识地将社交媒体作为医学知识的来源,健康系统和组织在社交媒体平台上共享时需要更加努力地识别专业知识、来源和证据质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86c6/11612580/f080605183e4/infodemiology_v4i1e56675_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86c6/11612580/c117ca52ca16/infodemiology_v4i1e56675_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86c6/11612580/34e1aa646d68/infodemiology_v4i1e56675_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86c6/11612580/57aa81194de9/infodemiology_v4i1e56675_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86c6/11612580/f080605183e4/infodemiology_v4i1e56675_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86c6/11612580/c117ca52ca16/infodemiology_v4i1e56675_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86c6/11612580/34e1aa646d68/infodemiology_v4i1e56675_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86c6/11612580/57aa81194de9/infodemiology_v4i1e56675_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86c6/11612580/f080605183e4/infodemiology_v4i1e56675_fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Association Between X/Twitter and Prescribing Behavior During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Ecological Study.X/Twitter 与新冠大流行期间的处方行为之间的关联:回顾性生态研究。
JMIR Infodemiology. 2024 Nov 18;4:e56675. doi: 10.2196/56675.
2
Tweets by People With Arthritis During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Content and Sentiment Analysis.新冠疫情期间关节炎患者的推文:内容与情感分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 3;22(12):e24550. doi: 10.2196/24550.
3
Emergency Physician Twitter Use in the COVID-19 Pandemic as a Potential Predictor of Impending Surge: Retrospective Observational Study.《COVID-19 大流行期间急诊医师在 Twitter 上的使用情况可能预示着即将出现的疫情高峰:回顾性观察研究》
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 14;23(7):e28615. doi: 10.2196/28615.
4
Social Media and Research Publication Activity During Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Trend Analysis.社交媒体与 COVID-19 大流行早期阶段的研究出版活动:纵向趋势分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 17;23(6):e26956. doi: 10.2196/26956.
5
Using Twitter Comments to Understand People's Experiences of UK Health Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Thematic and Sentiment Analysis.利用推特评论了解新冠疫情期间英国人对英国医疗保健的体验:主题和情感分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 25;23(10):e31101. doi: 10.2196/31101.
6
Topics, Trends, and Sentiments of Tweets About the COVID-19 Pandemic: Temporal Infoveillance Study.关于新冠疫情的推文主题、趋势和情绪:时间信息监测研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 23;22(10):e22624. doi: 10.2196/22624.
7
Temporal and Location Variations, and Link Categories for the Dissemination of COVID-19-Related Information on Twitter During the SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak in Europe: Infoveillance Study.欧洲SARS-CoV-2疫情期间推特上新冠疫情相关信息传播的时间和地点变化以及链接类别:信息监测研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 28;22(8):e19629. doi: 10.2196/19629.
8
Social Network Analysis of COVID-19 Sentiments: Application of Artificial Intelligence.COVID-19 舆情的社会网络分析:人工智能的应用
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 18;22(8):e22590. doi: 10.2196/22590.
9
Tracking discussions of complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: a month-by-month sentiment analysis of Twitter data.在 COVID-19 大流行背景下追踪补充、替代和整合医学的讨论:对 Twitter 数据进行逐月情感分析。
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2022 Apr 13;22(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12906-022-03586-1.
10
Social Media Insights Into US Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Analysis of Twitter Data.社交媒体洞察美国在 COVID-19 大流行期间的心理健康状况:对 Twitter 数据的纵向分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 14;22(12):e21418. doi: 10.2196/21418.

引用本文的文献

1
Measurement, Characterization, and Mapping of COVID-19 Misinformation in Spain: Cross-Sectional Study.西班牙新冠疫情虚假信息的测量、特征描述与映射:横断面研究
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Jun 16;5:e69945. doi: 10.2196/69945.
2
The Impact of Stay-At-Home Mandates on Uncertainty and Sentiments: Quasi-Experimental Study.居家令对不确定性和情绪的影响:准实验研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 4;27:e64667. doi: 10.2196/64667.
3
Characterizing Public Sentiments and Drug Interactions in the COVID-19 Pandemic Using Social Media: Natural Language Processing and Network Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Communication of COVID-19 Misinformation on Social Media by Physicians in the US.社交媒体上美国医生传播的 COVID-19 错误信息。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2328928. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.28928.
2
A reliable sentiment analysis for classification of tweets in social networks.一种用于社交网络中推文分类的可靠情感分析。
Soc Netw Anal Min. 2023;13(1):7. doi: 10.1007/s13278-022-00998-2. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
3
Social Media-Based Collaborative Learning Effects on Student Performance/Learner Performance With Moderating Role of Academic Self-Efficacy.
利用社交媒体表征新冠疫情中的公众情绪与药物相互作用:自然语言处理与网络分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 5;27:e63755. doi: 10.2196/63755.
基于社交媒体的协作学习对学生成绩/学习者表现的影响以及学业自我效能感的调节作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 8;13:903919. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.903919. eCollection 2022.
4
Impacts of the Internet on Health Inequality and Healthcare Access: A Cross-Country Study.互联网对健康不平等和医疗保健可及性的影响:一项跨国研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 9;10:935608. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.935608. eCollection 2022.
5
Use of hydroxychloroquine to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection and treat mild COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.使用羟氯喹预防 SARS-CoV-2 感染和治疗轻症 COVID-19:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Bras Pneumol. 2021 Oct 15;47(5):e20210236. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20210236. eCollection 2021.
6
Accuracy of health-related information regarding COVID-19 on Twitter during a global pandemic.全球大流行期间推特上关于新冠病毒病的健康相关信息的准确性。
World Med Health Policy. 2021 Sep;13(3):503-517. doi: 10.1002/wmh3.468. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
7
Lies Kill, Facts Save: Detecting COVID-19 Misinformation in Twitter.谎言杀人,事实救人:在推特上检测新冠疫情虚假信息
IEEE Access. 2020 Aug 26;8:155961-155970. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3019600. eCollection 2020.
8
Twitter discourse reveals geographical and temporal variation in concerns about COVID-19 vaccines in the United States.推特言论揭示了美国民众对新冠疫苗担忧的地域和时间差异。
Vaccine. 2021 Jul 5;39(30):4034-4038. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.06.014. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
9
Emergency Physician Twitter Use in the COVID-19 Pandemic as a Potential Predictor of Impending Surge: Retrospective Observational Study.《COVID-19 大流行期间急诊医师在 Twitter 上的使用情况可能预示着即将出现的疫情高峰:回顾性观察研究》
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 14;23(7):e28615. doi: 10.2196/28615.
10
An exploratory study of COVID-19 misinformation on Twitter.关于推特上新冠疫情错误信息的探索性研究。
Online Soc Netw Media. 2021 Mar;22:100104. doi: 10.1016/j.osnem.2020.100104. Epub 2021 Feb 19.