• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

道德关联图:一种用于自动道德推理的认知模型。

Moral Association Graph: A Cognitive Model for Automated Moral Inference.

作者信息

Ramezani Aida, Xu Yang

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto.

Cognitive Science Program, University of Toronto.

出版信息

Top Cogn Sci. 2025 Jan;17(1):120-138. doi: 10.1111/tops.12774. Epub 2024 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1111/tops.12774
PMID:39585761
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11792775/
Abstract

Automated moral inference is an emerging topic of critical importance in artificial intelligence. The contemporary approach typically relies on language models to infer moral relevance or moral properties of a concept. This approach demands complex parameterization and costly computation, and it tends to disconnect with existing psychological accounts of moralization. We present a simple cognitive model for moral inference, Moral Association Graph (MAG), inspired by psychological work on moralization. Our model builds on word association network for inferring moral relevance and draws on rich psychological data. We demonstrate that MAG performs competitively to state-of-the-art language models when evaluated against a comprehensive set of data for automated inference of moral norms and moral judgment of concepts, and in-context moral inference. We also show that our model yields interpretable outputs and is applicable to informing short-term moral change.

摘要

自动化道德推理是人工智能中一个新兴的极其重要的话题。当代方法通常依赖语言模型来推断一个概念的道德相关性或道德属性。这种方法需要复杂的参数设置和高昂的计算成本,并且往往与现有的道德形成心理学解释脱节。我们提出了一种用于道德推理的简单认知模型——道德关联图(MAG),它受到道德形成心理学研究的启发。我们的模型基于用于推断道德相关性的词关联网络构建,并借鉴了丰富的心理学数据。我们证明,在针对用于自动推断道德规范、概念的道德判断以及情境道德推理的综合数据集进行评估时,MAG的表现与当前最先进的语言模型不相上下。我们还表明,我们的模型能够产生可解释的输出,并且适用于为短期道德变化提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0018/11792775/32a63b31ae98/TOPS-17-120-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0018/11792775/02281bede08e/TOPS-17-120-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0018/11792775/97cc5f032835/TOPS-17-120-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0018/11792775/32a63b31ae98/TOPS-17-120-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0018/11792775/02281bede08e/TOPS-17-120-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0018/11792775/97cc5f032835/TOPS-17-120-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0018/11792775/32a63b31ae98/TOPS-17-120-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Moral Association Graph: A Cognitive Model for Automated Moral Inference.道德关联图:一种用于自动道德推理的认知模型。
Top Cogn Sci. 2025 Jan;17(1):120-138. doi: 10.1111/tops.12774. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
2
A conceptual and computational model of moral decision making in human and artificial agents.人类和人工智能主体道德决策的概念与计算模型。
Top Cogn Sci. 2010 Jul;2(3):454-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01095.x. Epub 2010 May 13.
3
The Puzzle of Evaluating Moral Cognition in Artificial Agents.人工智能中道德认知评估的难题。
Cogn Sci. 2023 Aug;47(8):e13315. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13315.
4
Moral learning: Psychological and philosophical perspectives.道德学习:心理学与哲学视角
Cognition. 2017 Oct;167:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
5
Modeling Morality in 3-D: Decision-Making, Judgment, and Inference.三维中的道德建模:决策、判断和推理。
Top Cogn Sci. 2019 Apr;11(2):409-432. doi: 10.1111/tops.12382. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
6
Learning a commonsense moral theory.学习一种常识性道德理论。
Cognition. 2017 Oct;167:107-123. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.005. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
7
Moralization Through Moral Shock: Exploring Emotional Antecedents to Moral Conviction.道德冲击下的道德规范:探索道德信念的情感前因。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2017 Feb;43(2):139-150. doi: 10.1177/0146167216676479. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
8
Artificial Moral Responsibility: How We Can and Cannot Hold Machines Responsible.人工道德责任:我们能够且不能如何让机器负责。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2021 Jul;30(3):435-447. doi: 10.1017/S0963180120000985.
9
The Human Side of Artificial Intelligence.人工智能的人文层面
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Oct;26(5):2427-2437. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00239-9.
10
Bright mind, moral mind? Intelligence is unrelated to consequentialist moral judgment in sacrificial moral dilemmas.聪明的头脑,道德的头脑?在牺牲性道德困境中,智力与后果主义道德判断无关。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Apr;27(2):392-397. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01676-9.

本文引用的文献

1
The Pandemic in Words: Tracking Fast Semantic Changes via a Large-Scale Word Association Task.文字中的大流行:通过大规模词汇联想任务追踪快速语义变化
Open Mind (Camb). 2023 Jun 9;7:221-239. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00081. eCollection 2023.
2
Can AI language models replace human participants?人工智能语言模型能否替代人类参与者?
Trends Cogn Sci. 2023 Jul;27(7):597-600. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2023.04.008. Epub 2023 May 10.
3
The "Small World of Words" free association norms for Rioplatense Spanish.《拉普拉塔西班牙语的“词汇小世界”自由联想规范》。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Feb;56(2):968-985. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02070-z. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
4
Evolution of emotion semantics.情感语义的演变。
Cognition. 2021 Dec;217:104875. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104875. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
5
A Framework for the Computational Linguistic Analysis of Dehumanization.一种去人性化计算语言学分析框架。
Front Artif Intell. 2020 Aug 7;3:55. doi: 10.3389/frai.2020.00055. eCollection 2020.
6
Visual and Affective Multimodal Models of Word Meaning in Language and Mind.语言与思维中的词意视觉与情感多模态模型。
Cogn Sci. 2021 Jan;45(1):e12922. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12922.
7
The extended Moral Foundations Dictionary (eMFD): Development and applications of a crowd-sourced approach to extracting moral intuitions from text.扩展的道德基础词典(eMFD):一种从文本中提取道德直觉的众包方法的开发和应用。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Feb;53(1):232-246. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01433-0.
8
Recency negativity: Newer food crops are evaluated less favorably.近期性负向偏见:人们对较新的粮食作物的评价较低。
Appetite. 2020 Nov 1;154:104754. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104754. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
9
Moralization in social networks and the emergence of violence during protests.社交网络中的道德化与抗议活动中的暴力行为的出现。
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Jun;2(6):389-396. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0353-0. Epub 2018 May 23.
10
Understanding the process of moralization: How eating meat becomes a moral issue.理解道德化的过程:吃肉如何成为一个道德问题。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Jul;117(1):50-72. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000149. Epub 2019 Mar 14.