• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在健康与退休研究的横断面样本中,自评的心理和体力工作需求对认知的影响是相互依存的。

Effects of self-rated mental and physical work demands on cognition are dependent in a cross-sectional sample of the Health and Retirement Study.

作者信息

Hickman Ruby C, Wang Herong, Brandt Daniel J, Ware Erin B, Bakulski Kelly M

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

medRxiv. 2024 Nov 11:2024.11.11.24317122. doi: 10.1101/2024.11.11.24317122.

DOI:10.1101/2024.11.11.24317122
PMID:39606405
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11601729/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed whether self-rated physical and mental work demands were associated with cognition among older working adults and whether their effects were dependent.

METHODS

Our cross-sectional sample consisted of 6,377 working older adults uisng the Health and Retirement Study in 2004. Self-rated work demands were summarized from four questions about frequency of mental or physical demands in the respondent's current job. Cognition was assessed using a subset of the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status. We used multivariable linear regression to test for associations and additive interaction between physical and mental work demands and cognition, adjusted for age, sex, race, education, and practice effect.

RESULTS

Independently, higher physical work demands were associated <0.001 with poorer cognition and higher mental work demands were associated (<0.001) with better cognition. The effect of one work demand measure became more negative as level of the other increased (B for interaction = -0.23, 95% CI: -0.43, -0.03). A one-point increase in mental work demands was associated with 0.79 (95% CI: 0.51, 1.08) points higher cognition score when physical work demands were lowest, but was not associated with cognition when physical work demands were highest (0.11, 95% CI: -0.26, 0.48). The highest predicted cognition score was for the highest mental and lowest physical work demands. Results were robust to additional adjustment for health and behavior covariates.

CONCLUSIONS

The associations of self-rated mental and physical work demands on cognition are dependent. Future studies should strongly consider examining interactions to capture the range of work demand effects.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了自评的体力和脑力工作需求是否与老年在职成年人的认知能力相关,以及它们的影响是否相互依赖。

方法

我们的横断面样本包括2004年使用健康与退休研究的6377名老年在职成年人。自评工作需求是根据关于受访者当前工作中脑力或体力需求频率的四个问题汇总得出的。认知能力使用认知状态电话访谈的一个子集进行评估。我们使用多变量线性回归来测试体力和脑力工作需求与认知能力之间的关联以及相加交互作用,并对年龄、性别、种族、教育程度和练习效应进行了调整。

结果

单独来看,较高的体力工作需求与较差的认知能力相关(<0.001),较高的脑力工作需求与较好的认知能力相关(<0.001)。一种工作需求衡量指标的影响随着另一种指标水平的增加而变得更负面(交互作用的B值 = -0.23,95%置信区间:-0.43,-0.03)。当体力工作需求最低时,脑力工作需求增加一分与认知得分高0.79分(95%置信区间:0.51,1.08)相关,但当体力工作需求最高时,与认知能力无关(0.11,95%置信区间:-0.26,0.48)。预测的最高认知得分是脑力工作需求最高且体力工作需求最低时的得分。对健康和行为协变量进行额外调整后,结果依然稳健。

结论

自评的脑力和体力工作需求与认知能力之间的关联是相互依赖的。未来的研究应大力考虑检验交互作用,以全面了解工作需求效应的范围。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9989/11601729/eab41b9ad663/nihpp-2024.11.11.24317122v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9989/11601729/eab41b9ad663/nihpp-2024.11.11.24317122v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9989/11601729/eab41b9ad663/nihpp-2024.11.11.24317122v1-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of self-rated mental and physical work demands on cognition are dependent in a cross-sectional sample of the Health and Retirement Study.在健康与退休研究的横断面样本中,自评的心理和体力工作需求对认知的影响是相互依存的。
medRxiv. 2024 Nov 11:2024.11.11.24317122. doi: 10.1101/2024.11.11.24317122.
2
Psychosocial working conditions, trajectories of disability, and the mediating role of cognitive decline and chronic diseases: A population-based cohort study.心理社会工作条件、残疾轨迹以及认知能力下降和慢性疾病的中介作用:一项基于人群的队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2019 Sep 16;16(9):e1002899. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002899. eCollection 2019 Sep.
3
Association of mental demands in the workplace with cognitive function in older adults at increased risk for dementia.工作场所心理需求与认知功能的关联:痴呆高危老年人。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Dec 10;21(1):688. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02653-5.
4
Associations of psychosocial working conditions with self-rated general health and mental health among municipal employees.市政雇员的心理社会工作条件与自评总体健康和心理健康的关联。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2006 Mar;79(3):205-12. doi: 10.1007/s00420-005-0054-7. Epub 2005 Oct 28.
5
Multifaceted Demands of Work and Cognitive Functioning: Findings From the Health and Retirement Study.工作的多方面需求与认知功能:来自健康与退休研究的发现。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 Feb 3;77(2):351-361. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab087.
6
Mental work demands, retirement, and longitudinal trajectories of cognitive functioning.精神工作需求、退休与认知功能的纵向轨迹。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2014 Apr;19(2):231-42. doi: 10.1037/a0035724. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
7
Job Demands May Determine Cognitive and Physical Aging After Retirement.工作要求可能决定退休后的认知和身体衰老。
J Appl Gerontol. 2022 Dec;41(12):2435-2446. doi: 10.1177/07334648221120080. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
8
Information and communication technology demands at work: the association with job strain, effort-reward imbalance and self-rated health in different socio-economic strata.工作中的信息与通信技术需求:不同社会经济阶层中与工作压力、努力-回报失衡及自评健康的关联
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2016 Oct;89(7):1049-58. doi: 10.1007/s00420-016-1140-8. Epub 2016 May 19.
9
A cross-sectional study of self-rated health among older adults: a comparison of China and the United States.一项关于老年人自评健康的横断面研究:中国与美国的比较。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 31;9(7):e027895. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027895.
10
Domains of cognitive function in early old age: which ones are predicted by pre-retirement psychosocial work characteristics?老年早期认知功能的领域:哪些领域可由退休前的心理社会工作特征预测?
Occup Environ Med. 2016 Oct;73(10):640-7. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2015-103352. Epub 2016 May 17.

本文引用的文献

1
2022 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures.2022 年阿尔茨海默病事实和数据。
Alzheimers Dement. 2022 Apr;18(4):700-789. doi: 10.1002/alz.12638. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
2
Multifaceted Demands of Work and Cognitive Functioning: Findings From the Health and Retirement Study.工作的多方面需求与认知功能:来自健康与退休研究的发现。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 Feb 3;77(2):351-361. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab087.
3
Older Workers with Physically Demanding Jobs and their Cognitive Functioning.从事体力要求高的工作的老年工人及其认知功能。
Ageing Int. 2022;47(1):55-71. doi: 10.1007/s12126-020-09404-8. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
4
How Are Employers Responding to an Aging Workforce?雇主如何应对老龄化劳动力?
Gerontologist. 2020 Nov 23;60(8):1403-1410. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa031.
5
Systematic review and meta-analysis investigating moderators of long-term effects of exercise on cognition in healthy individuals.系统评价和荟萃分析研究了运动对健康个体认知的长期影响的调节因素。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jun;4(6):603-612. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0851-8. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
6
Defining Cognitive Reserve and Implications for Cognitive Aging.定义认知储备及其对认知老化的影响。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2019 Jan 9;19(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s11910-019-0917-z.
7
Whitepaper: Defining and investigating cognitive reserve, brain reserve, and brain maintenance.白皮书:定义和研究认知储备、脑储备和脑维护。
Alzheimers Dement. 2020 Sep;16(9):1305-1311. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.07.219. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
8
Cognitive functioning, aging, and work: A review and recommendations for research and practice.认知功能、衰老与工作:研究与实践综述及建议
J Occup Health Psychol. 2017 Jul;22(3):314-336. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000086. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
9
Which types of mental work demands may be associated with reduced risk of dementia?哪些类型的脑力劳动需求可能与降低痴呆风险有关?
Alzheimers Dement. 2017 Apr;13(4):431-440. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
10
Can psychosocial work conditions protect against age-related cognitive decline? Results from a systematic review.社会心理工作条件能否预防与年龄相关的认知衰退?一项系统综述的结果。
Occup Environ Med. 2016 Jul;73(7):487-96. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2016-103550. Epub 2016 May 13.