Eales Oliver, McCaw James M, Shearer Freya M
Infectious Disease Dynamics Unit, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2024 Dec;18(12):e70050. doi: 10.1111/irv.70050.
Monitoring how the incidence of influenza infections changes over time is important for quantifying the transmission dynamics and clinical severity of influenza. Infection incidence is difficult to measure directly, and hence, other quantities which are more amenable to surveillance are used to monitor trends in infection levels, with the implicit assumption that they correlate with infection incidence.
Here, we demonstrate, through mathematical reasoning using fundamental mathematical principles, the relationship between the incidence of influenza infections and three commonly reported surveillance indicators: (1) the rate per unit time of influenza-like illness reported through sentinel healthcare sites, (2) the rate per unit time of laboratory-confirmed influenza infections and (3) the proportion of laboratory tests positive for influenza ('test-positive proportion').
Our analysis suggests that none of these ubiquitously reported surveillance indicators are a reliable tool for monitoring influenza incidence. In particular, we highlight how these surveillance indicators can be heavily biassed by the following: the dynamics of circulating pathogens (other than influenza) with similar symptom profiles, changes in testing rates and differences in infection rates, symptom rates and healthcare-seeking behaviour between age-groups and through time. We make six practical recommendations to improve the monitoring of influenza infection incidence. The implementation of our recommendations would enable the construction of more interpretable surveillance indicator(s) for influenza from which underlying patterns of infection incidence could be readily monitored.
The implementation of all (or a subset) of our recommendations would greatly improve understanding of the transmission dynamics, infection burden and clinical severity of influenza, improving our ability to respond effectively to seasonal epidemics and future pandemics.
监测流感感染发病率随时间的变化对于量化流感的传播动态和临床严重程度至关重要。感染发病率难以直接测量,因此,使用其他更易于监测的指标来监测感染水平的趋势,并隐含假设它们与感染发病率相关。
在此,我们通过运用基本数学原理进行数学推理,证明了流感感染发病率与三个常用报告监测指标之间的关系:(1)通过定点医疗机构报告的流感样疾病的单位时间发病率,(2)实验室确诊的流感感染的单位时间发病率,以及(3)流感检测呈阳性的实验室检测比例(“检测阳性比例”)。
我们的分析表明,这些普遍报告的监测指标都不是监测流感发病率的可靠工具。特别是,我们强调了这些监测指标可能会受到以下因素的严重影响:具有相似症状特征的循环病原体(非流感)的动态变化、检测率的变化、不同年龄组之间以及不同时间的感染率、症状率和就医行为差异。我们提出了六项实用建议以改进流感感染发病率的监测。实施我们的建议将能够构建更具可解释性的流感监测指标,从中可以轻松监测感染发病率的潜在模式。
实施我们所有(或部分)建议将极大地增进对流感传播动态、感染负担和临床严重程度的理解,提高我们有效应对季节性流行和未来大流行的能力。