Karadeniz Betül Kübra Kurucu, Karaman Emel
Faculty of Dentistry Department of Restorative Dentistry, Giresun University, Giresun, Turkey.
Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey.
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Dec 4;24(1):1471. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05260-z.
The increase in the prevalence of erosion lesions worldwide has led researchers to develop effective toothpastes with different ingredients to prevent erosion that can protect the tooth surface against acid attacks. There remains a lack of consensus in the literature regarding which toothpaste formulation exhibits the most effective preventive action against erosive tooth wear, highlighting the necessity for further investigation in this field. This study aimed to evaluate the preventive effect of brushing with toothpastes with different ingredients on enamel and dentine erosion.
The crowns and roots of ninety recently extracted bovine incisors were seperated and ground flat to obtain enamel and dentine surfaces. The obtained specimens were then divided into six groups: Curaprox Enzycal Zero Flouride (fluoride-free), Colgate Total 12 (1450 ppm NaF), Splat Biocalcium (fluoride-free and Nano-HAP), Colgate ProRelief (1450 ppm NaF and arginine), Sensodyne Repair and Protection (1450 ppm NaF and novamin), Opalescence Whitening (1100 ppm NaF). The specimens were immersed in a demineralizing solution for 2 min and in an artificial saliva for 60 min 4 times a day for 5 days. Brushing was performed with the aid of a charged toothbrush immediately after the first and last erosive attacks. Initial and final surface roughness (at the end of fifth day) were measured using a 3D profilometer. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare initial and final roughness values (p < 0.05).
Opalescence Whitening and Curaprox Enzycal Zero Fluoride significantly increased both enamel and dentine surface roughness compared to baseline, demonstrating rougher surfaces than all other groups except Colgate ProRelief (p < 0.001). Sensodyne Repair and Protection and Colgate Total 12 resulted in the smoothest enamel and dentine surfaces, respectively. The increase in surface roughness was significantly higher for enamel samples compared to dentine samples in the Opalescence Whitening group (p < 0.001).
Whitening toothpastes may exacerbate dental erosion by increasing surface roughness. The protective properties of fluoride-free toothpastes vary depending on their active ingredient.
全球范围内牙齿侵蚀病变患病率的上升促使研究人员开发出含有不同成分的有效牙膏,以预防牙齿侵蚀,从而保护牙齿表面免受酸蚀攻击。关于哪种牙膏配方对侵蚀性牙齿磨损具有最有效的预防作用,文献中仍缺乏共识,这凸显了该领域进一步研究的必要性。本研究旨在评估使用含有不同成分的牙膏刷牙对牙釉质和牙本质侵蚀的预防效果。
将90颗近期拔除的牛切牙的牙冠和牙根分离并磨平,以获得牙釉质和牙本质表面。然后将获得的标本分为六组:Curaprox Enzycal Zero Fluoride(无氟)、高露洁全效12(1450 ppm氟化钠)、Splat Biocalcium(无氟和纳米羟基磷灰石)、高露洁ProRelief(1450 ppm氟化钠和精氨酸)、舒适达修复护理(1450 ppm氟化钠和诺瓦敏)、皓齿美白(1100 ppm氟化钠)。标本每天在脱矿溶液中浸泡2分钟,在人工唾液中浸泡60分钟,共进行4次,持续5天。在第一次和最后一次侵蚀攻击后,立即使用电动牙刷进行刷牙。使用三维轮廓仪测量初始和最终表面粗糙度(在第五天结束时)。采用威尔科克森检验比较初始和最终粗糙度值(p < 0.05)。
与基线相比,皓齿美白和Curaprox Enzycal Zero Fluoride显著增加了牙釉质和牙本质的表面粗糙度,显示出比除高露洁ProRelief之外的所有其他组更粗糙的表面(p < 0.001)。舒适达修复护理和高露洁全效12分别使牙釉质和牙本质表面最光滑。在皓齿美白组中,牙釉质样本的表面粗糙度增加显著高于牙本质样本(p < 0.001)。
美白牙膏可能会因增加表面粗糙度而加剧牙齿侵蚀。无氟牙膏的保护特性因其活性成分而异。