Fung Jacqueline, Rashkin Misha, Barton Claire, Grajales Lizette, Jan Cheng-Wei, Lara-Otero Karlena, Narain Anjali, Rios-Ventura Sonia, Rowe-Teeter Courtney, Torres Zapata Astrid, Tucker Brianna, Ford James M
Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford Health Care, Palo Alto, California, USA.
J Genet Couns. 2025 Jun;34(3):e2001. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.2001. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
The concept of patient engagement has been widely studied for decades in the fields of medicine, nursing, psychology, social science, public health, and policy, and increased levels of patient engagement have been shown to improve health outcomes and strengthen reported experiences of care. Despite this, little research has been done to evaluate what patient engagement looks like within the context of a genetic counseling session. Additionally, there is limited literature from researchers based in the United States that aims to better understand patient engagement in non-English-speaking populations. This study is part of a larger protocol entitled "Multilingual Education Research in Genetic counseling Engagement (MERGE)," and it explores the elements that make up patient engagement in the context of pre-test genetic counseling for hereditary cancer risk among English- and Spanish-speaking patients. Eligible patients were 18 years or older at the time of their genetic counseling visit, had a personal or family history of breast cancer (if English-speaking) or a personal or family history of any cancer (if Spanish-speaking), and had not previously been seen for hereditary cancer genetic counseling. Out of 40 enrolled participants, 60% of patients (24/40) were English-speaking, while 40% of patients (16/40) were Spanish-speaking. In this study, English transcripts were generated from audio-recordings of clinical, standard-of-care genetic counseling sessions. The transcripts were qualitatively coded by two raters using an inductive approach, allowing for big Q thematic analysis. Six major themes were identified, describing ways in which patients show engagement and participate in decision-making during a pre-test genetic counseling session. All data were analyzed collectively, as assessment of differences between the language groups was not a primary analysis question. From the six themes, a definition of patient engagement in genetic counseling is proposed such that it consists of four "components" that together promote shared decision-making: Application of Education; Expression of Emotions; Feelings of Ownership; and Therapeutic Alliance. This working definition of patient engagement in genetic counseling has overlap with previous research on patient engagement in healthcare and with the Reciprocal-Engagement Model of genetic counseling. Future research on this topic can investigate methods for measuring and improving patient engagement across different settings and service delivery models.
几十年来,患者参与的概念在医学、护理、心理学、社会科学、公共卫生和政策等领域得到了广泛研究,研究表明,患者参与度的提高有助于改善健康状况,并增强报告的护理体验。尽管如此,在基因咨询过程中,对于患者参与具体表现的评估研究却很少。此外,美国研究人员旨在更好地了解非英语人群患者参与情况的文献也很有限。本研究是名为“基因咨询参与中的多语言教育研究(MERGE)”的更大研究方案的一部分,它探讨了在针对讲英语和西班牙语患者的遗传性癌症风险的基因咨询前测试中,构成患者参与的要素。符合条件的患者在进行基因咨询时年龄在18岁及以上,有乳腺癌个人或家族史(如果是讲英语的患者)或任何癌症的个人或家族史(如果是讲西班牙语的患者),并且之前未曾接受过遗传性癌症基因咨询。在40名登记参与者中,60%的患者(24/40)讲英语,而40%的患者(16/40)讲西班牙语。在本研究中,从临床标准护理基因咨询会话的录音中生成了英语文字记录。两名评分者采用归纳法对文字记录进行定性编码,进行大Q主题分析。确定了六个主要主题,描述了患者在基因咨询前测试会话中表现出参与并参与决策的方式。所有数据进行了综合分析,因为语言组之间差异的评估不是主要分析问题。从这六个主题中,提出了基因咨询中患者参与的定义,即它由四个“组成部分”构成,共同促进共同决策:教育应用;情感表达;主人翁意识;治疗联盟。这个基因咨询中患者参与的工作定义与先前关于医疗保健中患者参与的研究以及基因咨询的互惠参与模型有重叠。关于这个主题的未来研究可以调查在不同环境和服务提供模式下测量和改善患者参与的方法。