• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

遗传咨询中患者参与度的新兴定义。

An eMERGEing definition of patient engagement in genetic counseling.

作者信息

Fung Jacqueline, Rashkin Misha, Barton Claire, Grajales Lizette, Jan Cheng-Wei, Lara-Otero Karlena, Narain Anjali, Rios-Ventura Sonia, Rowe-Teeter Courtney, Torres Zapata Astrid, Tucker Brianna, Ford James M

机构信息

Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.

Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford Health Care, Palo Alto, California, USA.

出版信息

J Genet Couns. 2025 Jun;34(3):e2001. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.2001. Epub 2024 Dec 5.

DOI:10.1002/jgc4.2001
PMID:39639431
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12041834/
Abstract

The concept of patient engagement has been widely studied for decades in the fields of medicine, nursing, psychology, social science, public health, and policy, and increased levels of patient engagement have been shown to improve health outcomes and strengthen reported experiences of care. Despite this, little research has been done to evaluate what patient engagement looks like within the context of a genetic counseling session. Additionally, there is limited literature from researchers based in the United States that aims to better understand patient engagement in non-English-speaking populations. This study is part of a larger protocol entitled "Multilingual Education Research in Genetic counseling Engagement (MERGE)," and it explores the elements that make up patient engagement in the context of pre-test genetic counseling for hereditary cancer risk among English- and Spanish-speaking patients. Eligible patients were 18 years or older at the time of their genetic counseling visit, had a personal or family history of breast cancer (if English-speaking) or a personal or family history of any cancer (if Spanish-speaking), and had not previously been seen for hereditary cancer genetic counseling. Out of 40 enrolled participants, 60% of patients (24/40) were English-speaking, while 40% of patients (16/40) were Spanish-speaking. In this study, English transcripts were generated from audio-recordings of clinical, standard-of-care genetic counseling sessions. The transcripts were qualitatively coded by two raters using an inductive approach, allowing for big Q thematic analysis. Six major themes were identified, describing ways in which patients show engagement and participate in decision-making during a pre-test genetic counseling session. All data were analyzed collectively, as assessment of differences between the language groups was not a primary analysis question. From the six themes, a definition of patient engagement in genetic counseling is proposed such that it consists of four "components" that together promote shared decision-making: Application of Education; Expression of Emotions; Feelings of Ownership; and Therapeutic Alliance. This working definition of patient engagement in genetic counseling has overlap with previous research on patient engagement in healthcare and with the Reciprocal-Engagement Model of genetic counseling. Future research on this topic can investigate methods for measuring and improving patient engagement across different settings and service delivery models.

摘要

几十年来,患者参与的概念在医学、护理、心理学、社会科学、公共卫生和政策等领域得到了广泛研究,研究表明,患者参与度的提高有助于改善健康状况,并增强报告的护理体验。尽管如此,在基因咨询过程中,对于患者参与具体表现的评估研究却很少。此外,美国研究人员旨在更好地了解非英语人群患者参与情况的文献也很有限。本研究是名为“基因咨询参与中的多语言教育研究(MERGE)”的更大研究方案的一部分,它探讨了在针对讲英语和西班牙语患者的遗传性癌症风险的基因咨询前测试中,构成患者参与的要素。符合条件的患者在进行基因咨询时年龄在18岁及以上,有乳腺癌个人或家族史(如果是讲英语的患者)或任何癌症的个人或家族史(如果是讲西班牙语的患者),并且之前未曾接受过遗传性癌症基因咨询。在40名登记参与者中,60%的患者(24/40)讲英语,而40%的患者(16/40)讲西班牙语。在本研究中,从临床标准护理基因咨询会话的录音中生成了英语文字记录。两名评分者采用归纳法对文字记录进行定性编码,进行大Q主题分析。确定了六个主要主题,描述了患者在基因咨询前测试会话中表现出参与并参与决策的方式。所有数据进行了综合分析,因为语言组之间差异的评估不是主要分析问题。从这六个主题中,提出了基因咨询中患者参与的定义,即它由四个“组成部分”构成,共同促进共同决策:教育应用;情感表达;主人翁意识;治疗联盟。这个基因咨询中患者参与的工作定义与先前关于医疗保健中患者参与的研究以及基因咨询的互惠参与模型有重叠。关于这个主题的未来研究可以调查在不同环境和服务提供模式下测量和改善患者参与的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4748/12041834/c068c645474a/JGC4-34-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4748/12041834/afe329e9ed3b/JGC4-34-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4748/12041834/311d4b7fabf2/JGC4-34-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4748/12041834/c068c645474a/JGC4-34-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4748/12041834/afe329e9ed3b/JGC4-34-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4748/12041834/311d4b7fabf2/JGC4-34-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4748/12041834/c068c645474a/JGC4-34-0-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
An eMERGEing definition of patient engagement in genetic counseling.遗传咨询中患者参与度的新兴定义。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Jun;34(3):e2001. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.2001. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
2
Perspectives on Spanish language concordant cancer genetic counseling sessions from the Spanish-speaking population.西班牙语人群对西班牙语一致的癌症遗传咨询会议的看法。
J Genet Couns. 2023 Feb;32(1):111-127. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1628. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
3
Spanish language concordance in genetic counseling sessions in the United States: Counselor experiences and perceptions of its effects on processes and outcomes.美国遗传咨询会议中的西班牙语一致性:顾问对其对过程和结果的影响的经验和看法。
J Genet Couns. 2022 Feb;31(1):188-205. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1472. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
4
Cancer Counseling of Low-Income Limited English Proficient Latina Women Using Medical Interpreters: Implications for Shared Decision-Making.利用医学口译员为低收入、英语水平有限的拉丁裔女性提供癌症咨询:对共同决策的启示。
J Genet Couns. 2018 Feb;27(1):155-168. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0132-5. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
5
Racial/Ethnic Differences in the Response to Incentives for Quitline Engagement.种族/民族差异对戒烟热线参与激励措施的反应。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Dec;55(6 Suppl 2):S186-S195. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.07.018.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Mode of delivery preference in prenatal genetic counseling between English- and Spanish-speaking patients at two US medical institutions.在两家美国医疗机构中,讲英语和西班牙语的患者在产前遗传咨询中的分娩方式偏好。
J Genet Couns. 2023 Oct;32(5):1069-1079. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1717. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
8
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
9
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
10
Communication pitfalls in interpreted genetic counseling sessions.遗传咨询口译过程中的沟通陷阱。
J Genet Couns. 2019 Aug;28(4):897-907. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1132. Epub 2019 May 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a researcher.迈向主题分析的良好实践:避免常见问题并成为一名研究者。
Int J Transgend Health. 2022 Oct 25;24(1):1-6. doi: 10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597. eCollection 2023.
2
Considerations for the use of qualitative methodologies in genetic counseling research.基因咨询研究中定性方法的使用考量
J Genet Couns. 2023 Apr;32(2):300-314. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1644. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
3
All together now - patient engagement, patient empowerment, and associated terms in personal healthcare.
现在一起 - 患者参与、患者赋权以及个人医疗保健中的相关术语。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 2;22(1):1116. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08501-5.
4
Strength of the genetic counselor: patient relationship is associated with extent of increased empowerment in patients with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy.遗传咨询师的优势在于:与心律失常性心肌病患者的关系强弱与患者的赋权程度呈正相关。
J Genet Couns. 2022 Apr;31(2):388-397. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1499. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
5
Patient engagement in care: A scoping review of recently validated tools assessing patients' and healthcare professionals' preferences and experience.患者参与医疗照护:最近经验证的评估患者和医疗保健专业人员偏好和体验的工具的范围综述。
Health Expect. 2021 Dec;24(6):1924-1935. doi: 10.1111/hex.13344. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
6
Adaptation of the working alliance inventory for the assessment of the therapeutic alliance in genetic counseling.工作联盟量表在遗传咨询中评估治疗联盟的适用性。
J Genet Couns. 2021 Feb;30(1):11-21. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1378. Epub 2021 Feb 7.
7
Health Literacy and Shared Decision-making: Exploring the Relationship to Enable Meaningful Patient Engagement in Healthcare.健康素养与共享决策:探索建立关系,以实现医疗保健中具有意义的患者参与。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Feb;36(2):521-524. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05912-0. Epub 2020 May 29.
8
Genetic Counseling and the Central Tenets of Practice.遗传咨询与实践的核心原则。
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2020 Mar 2;10(3):a038968. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a038968.
9
Cancer Genetic Counseling-Current Practice and Future Challenges.癌症遗传咨询——当前实践与未来挑战。
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2020 Jun 1;10(6):a036541. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a036541.
10
The impact of genetic counseling on patient engagement in a specialty cancer clinic.遗传咨询对专科癌症诊所患者参与度的影响。
J Genet Couns. 2019 Oct;28(5):974-981. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1149. Epub 2019 Jul 11.