• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证癌症幸存者群体职业康复核心集:一项横断面研究。

Validating the Core Set for Vocational Rehabilitation in a Population of Cancer Survivors: A Cross-Sectional Study.

作者信息

Paltrinieri Sara, Pellegrini Martina, Costi Stefania, Fugazzaro Stefania, Vicentini Massimo, Mancuso Pamela, Giorgi Rossi Paolo

机构信息

Research and EBP Unit, Health Professions Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS Di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Public Health Sciences PhD Program, Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Occup Rehabil. 2024 Dec 11. doi: 10.1007/s10926-024-10252-5.

DOI:10.1007/s10926-024-10252-5
PMID:39663312
Abstract

PURPOSE

The Core Set for Vocational Rehabilitation (CS-VR), a checklist based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), captures the work functioning of individuals requiring VR. By listening to cancer survivors' experiences and stakeholders' perspectives, the CS-VR-Onco of 85 ICF-based categories was obtained. The aim of this study was to assess the concurrent validity of the CS-VR-Onco by measuring this tool's ability to detect differences among cancer survivors in terms of perceived return to work (RTW)-related difficulties.

METHODS

A sample of 300 working-age individuals with a first diagnosis of cancer was selected through the local Cancer Registry. Of these 300, those employed individuals who had returned to work were deemed eligible. Through a guided interview, participants reported and described their perceived RTW-related difficulties using the terminology of the CS-VR-Onco. Frequencies and means were used to compare the results of (a) cancer survivors who reported having had difficulties with those who had not, and (b) cancer survivors who had undergone chemotherapy (CT) with those who had not.

RESULTS

Of the 104 respondents, 35 cancer survivors (Group 1) reported having had RTW-related difficulties and CS-VR-Onco-described problems, while 54 reported no difficulties but did highlight some problems (Group 2), and 15 reported neither difficulties nor problems (Group 3). The categories of the CS-VR-Onco that were prioritized were similar across groups, but Group 1 had higher frequencies than did Group 2 + 3 in 69 categories out of 85. In the second comparison, 40 cancer survivors who had undergone CT had higher frequencies than did 64 cancer survivors who had not undergone CT, but this trend was not applicable to 23 categories of the CS-VR-Onco. Seven categories were not reported as problems by all participants.

CONCLUSION

The CS-VR-Onco identified more problems in cancer survivors who reported RTW-related difficulties and differences between cancer survivors who had undergone CT and those who had not. These results contribute to assessing the preliminary validity of the tool.

摘要

目的

职业康复核心集(CS-VR)是一份基于《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)的清单,用于记录需要职业康复的个体的工作功能情况。通过倾听癌症幸存者的经历和利益相关者的观点,获得了包含85个基于ICF分类的癌症职业康复核心集(CS-VR-Onco)。本研究的目的是通过测量该工具检测癌症幸存者在感知到的与重返工作岗位(RTW)相关困难方面的差异的能力,来评估CS-VR-Onco的同时效度。

方法

通过当地癌症登记处选取了300名首次诊断为癌症的工作年龄个体作为样本。在这300人中,那些已重返工作岗位的受雇个体被视为符合条件。通过一次引导式访谈,参与者使用CS-VR-Onco的术语报告并描述了他们感知到的与RTW相关的困难。使用频率和均值来比较以下结果:(a)报告有困难的癌症幸存者与没有困难的癌症幸存者;(b)接受过化疗(CT)的癌症幸存者与未接受过化疗的癌症幸存者。

结果

在104名受访者中,35名癌症幸存者(第1组)报告有与RTW相关的困难以及CS-VR-Onco所描述的问题,54名报告没有困难但确实突出了一些问题(第2组),15名既没有报告困难也没有问题(第3组)。CS-VR-Onco中被优先考虑的类别在各组中相似,但在85个类别中的69个类别中,第1组的频率高于第2组+第3组。在第二次比较中,40名接受过CT的癌症幸存者的频率高于64名未接受过CT的癌症幸存者,但这种趋势不适用于CS-VR-Onco的23个类别。有7个类别并非所有参与者都报告为问题。

结论

CS-VR-Onco在报告有与RTW相关困难的癌症幸存者以及接受过CT与未接受过CT的癌症幸存者之间识别出了更多问题。这些结果有助于评估该工具的初步效度。

相似文献

1
Validating the Core Set for Vocational Rehabilitation in a Population of Cancer Survivors: A Cross-Sectional Study.验证癌症幸存者群体职业康复核心集:一项横断面研究。
J Occup Rehabil. 2024 Dec 11. doi: 10.1007/s10926-024-10252-5.
2
Adaptation of the Core Set for Vocational Rehabilitation for Cancer Survivors: A Qualitative Consensus-Based Study.适应癌症幸存者职业康复的核心集:基于定性共识的研究。
J Occup Rehabil. 2022 Dec;32(4):718-730. doi: 10.1007/s10926-022-10033-y. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
3
Validation of the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for Vocational Rehabilitation From the Perspective of Physical Therapists: International Delphi Survey.从物理治疗师角度对职业康复综合国际功能、残疾和健康分类核心组合的验证:国际德尔菲调查
Phys Ther. 2016 Aug;96(8):1262-75. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150365. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
4
Developing a Core Set to describe functioning in vocational rehabilitation using the international classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF).制定核心分类集以描述职业康复中的功能使用国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)。
J Occup Rehabil. 2010 Dec;20(4):502-11. doi: 10.1007/s10926-010-9241-9.
5
The Successful Return-To-Work Questionnaire for Cancer Survivors (I-RTW_CS): Development, Validity and Reproducibility.《癌症幸存者成功重返工作问卷(I-RTW_CS)》的制定、有效性和可重复性。
Patient. 2020 Oct;13(5):567-582. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00427-6.
6
Towards an ICF- and IMMPACT-based pain vocational rehabilitation core set in the Netherlands.迈向基于 ICF 和 IMMPACT 的荷兰疼痛职业康复核心组。
J Occup Rehabil. 2013 Dec;23(4):576-84. doi: 10.1007/s10926-013-9423-3.
7
Validation of the ICF Core Set for Vocational Rehabilitation from the perspective of patients with spinal cord injury using focus groups.从脊髓损伤患者的角度出发,采用焦点小组法对国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)职业康复核心组合进行验证。
Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(4):337-45. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1041611. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
8
Experiences of support to return to work after stroke: longitudinal case studies from RETAKE trial.中风后重返工作岗位的支持经历:来自RETAKE试验的纵向案例研究
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Mar 26:1-27. doi: 10.3310/WRKS9661.
9
Work Rehabilitation Questionnaire (WORQ): development and preliminary psychometric evidence of an ICF-based questionnaire for vocational rehabilitation.工作康复问卷(WORQ):一种基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)的职业康复问卷的编制及初步心理测量学证据
J Occup Rehabil. 2014 Sep;24(3):498-510. doi: 10.1007/s10926-013-9485-2.
10
Identification of relevant ICF categories in vocational rehabilitation: a cross sectional study evaluating the clinical perspective.识别职业康复中的相关国际功能、残疾和健康分类:一项评估临床视角的横断面研究。
J Occup Rehabil. 2011 Jun;21(2):156-66. doi: 10.1007/s10926-011-9308-2.

本文引用的文献

1
"Who am I?" A qualitative meta-synthesis of Chemotherapy-induced alopecia and body image perception in breast cancer patients.“我是谁?”一项关于乳腺癌患者化疗性脱发与体像感知的定性元分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Mar 28;31(4):237. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07704-8.
2
ESMO Expert Consensus Statements on Cancer Survivorship: promoting high-quality survivorship care and research in Europe.ESMO 专家共识声明:关注癌症幸存者——在欧洲推动高质量的生存关怀和研究
Ann Oncol. 2022 Nov;33(11):1119-1133. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.1941. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
3
Adaptation of the Core Set for Vocational Rehabilitation for Cancer Survivors: A Qualitative Consensus-Based Study.
适应癌症幸存者职业康复的核心集:基于定性共识的研究。
J Occup Rehabil. 2022 Dec;32(4):718-730. doi: 10.1007/s10926-022-10033-y. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
4
Work status changes and associated factors in a nationwide sample of Norwegian long-term breast cancer survivors.全国挪威长期乳腺癌幸存者样本中的工作状态变化及其相关因素。
J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Apr;18(2):375-384. doi: 10.1007/s11764-022-01202-2. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
5
Tailoring work participation support for cancer survivors using the stages of change: perspectives of (health care) professionals and survivors.根据改变阶段为癌症幸存者量身定制工作参与支持:(医疗保健)专业人员和幸存者的观点。
J Cancer Surviv. 2023 Jun;17(3):706-719. doi: 10.1007/s11764-022-01196-x. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
6
Return to work of Italian cancer survivors: A focus on prognostic work-related factors.意大利癌症幸存者的工作回归:聚焦预后相关的工作因素。
Work. 2022;71(3):681-691. doi: 10.3233/WOR-210008.
7
Validation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) core sets from 2001 to 2019 - a scoping review.2001 年至 2019 年国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)核心集的验证——范围综述。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jul;44(14):3736-3748. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1878562. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
8
Financial toxicity and employment status in cancer survivors. A systematic literature review.癌症幸存者的财务毒性和就业状况。系统文献综述。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Dec;28(12):5693-5708. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05719-z. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
9
Long-term work retention after treatment for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.癌症治疗后的长期工作保留:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cancer Surviv. 2020 Apr;14(2):135-150. doi: 10.1007/s11764-020-00862-2. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
10
Priorities of patients with multimorbidity and of clinicians regarding treatment and health outcomes: a systematic mixed studies review.多发病患者和临床医生在治疗和健康结果方面的优先事项:系统混合研究综述。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 12;10(2):e033445. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033445.