Chao Miao, Rozgonjuk Dmitri, Elhai Jon D, Yang Haibo, Montag Christian
Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education, Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, China.
Department of Molecular Psychology, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Helmholtzstr. 8/1, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
BMC Psychol. 2024 Dec 19;12(1):763. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02265-9.
Social capital is an important construct in diverse scientific disciplines for understanding health promotion, entrepreneurship, and economic growth. In an increasingly digitalized world, social capital can be established and used in both online and offline contexts. Previous research suggests that personality might be relevant to an understanding of individual differences in social capital. For instance, the literature suggests that extraversion is associated with more social capital. Against this background, the present study aimed to revisit social capital research, but with a broader focus on studying all Big Five Personality traits (assessed with the BFI-45) and their association with bonding (similarity-based relationships), bridging (diversity-based relationships) social capital dimensions, and well-being. Insights in social capital variables in offline and online areas were obtained via the Internet Social Capital Scale and well-being was assessed with Diener's Satisfaction with Life scale. In particular, the study aimed to understand if personality-well-being associations would emerge with online/offline social capital being a mediator. The questionnaires were filled in by n = 289 German speaking participants (73 males and 216 females). The results revealed that offline social capital in the form of bridging and bonding played a significant role in mediating the relationship between both agreeableness and extraversion with life satisfaction. Online social capital was not associated with life satisfaction and was only very weakly linked to some Big Five Personality traits. In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that offline social capital is very relevant for well-being, while online social capital shows no association with self-reported well-being levels and seems to be negligible for an understanding of well-being.
社会资本是不同科学学科中理解健康促进、创业和经济增长的重要概念。在日益数字化的世界中,社会资本可以在在线和离线环境中建立和使用。先前的研究表明,人格可能与理解社会资本的个体差异有关。例如,文献表明外向性与更多的社会资本相关。在此背景下,本研究旨在重新审视社会资本研究,但更广泛地关注研究所有大五人格特质(用BFI - 45评估)及其与联结(基于相似性的关系)、桥接(基于多样性的关系)社会资本维度以及幸福感的关联。通过互联网社会资本量表获得了线下和线上领域社会资本变量的相关见解,并使用迪纳的生活满意度量表评估幸福感。特别是,该研究旨在了解在线/离线社会资本作为中介时,人格与幸福感的关联是否会出现。问卷由n = 289名德语使用者填写(73名男性和216名女性)。结果显示,以桥接和联结形式存在的线下社会资本在中介宜人性和外向性与生活满意度之间的关系中发挥了重要作用。在线社会资本与生活满意度无关,并且仅与某些大五人格特质有非常微弱的联系。总之,本研究表明线下社会资本与幸福感非常相关,而在线社会资本与自我报告的幸福感水平无关,对于理解幸福感似乎可以忽略不计。