• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在运动训练工作环境中,提供以患者为中心的护理,注重患者教育和健康素养。

Delivering Patient-Centered Care With Respect to Patient Education and Health Literacy in Athletic Training Job Settings.

作者信息

Mitchell Alicia M, Neil Elizabeth R, Eberman Lindsey E, Armstrong Tara A, Greffly Thomas J P, Winkelmann Zachary K

机构信息

Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia.

Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.

出版信息

J Athl Train. 2025 Mar 1;60(3):259-272. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0148.24.

DOI:10.4085/1062-6050-0148.24
PMID:39729367
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11935305/
Abstract

CONTEXT

A patient-centered care (PCC) environment allows athletic trainers (ATs) to develop trusting relationships with patients, enabling them to make the most informed care decisions. To provide PCC, the AT should assess health literacy and deliver quality patient education.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the lived experiences of ATs from different job settings to identify how they deliver PCC specific to health literacy and patient education.

DESIGN

Qualitative.

SETTING

Virtual interviews.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-seven ATs (age = 34 ± 10 years; women = 15, men = 12) from the physician practice (n = 10), college (n = 9), and secondary school (n = 8) settings.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): We interviewed the participants using a semistructured interview protocol. Three researchers coded the transcripts after the consensual qualitative research process for each job setting. Trustworthiness was achieved through multianalyst triangulation, member checking, and internal auditing.

RESULTS

Four domains emerged from all interviews: (1) work environment, (2) essential traits and skills, (3) health literacy assessment strategies, and (4) patient education materials and delivery. In the work environment, ATs described the patient load, interprofessional relationships, and patient characteristics across settings. Essential traits and skills varied widely between settings, and ATs needed different strategies based on differing patient needs. For health literacy assessment strategies, ATs did not formally assess health literacy and relied on perceptions and assumptions. Effective digital information and health informatics strategies were described for patient education materials and delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

ATs from physician practice, college, and secondary school settings describe using various strategies to create a patient-centered environment. Participants shared their behaviors in assessing health literacy and delivering patient education from various job settings.

摘要

背景

以患者为中心的护理(PCC)环境使运动训练师(AT)能够与患者建立信任关系,从而使他们能够做出最明智的护理决策。为了提供PCC,AT应评估健康素养并提供高质量的患者教育。

目的

探讨来自不同工作环境的AT的生活经历,以确定他们如何提供针对健康素养和患者教育的PCC。

设计

定性研究。

设置

虚拟访谈。

患者或其他参与者

来自医生诊所(n = 10)、大学(n = 9)和中学(n = 8)环境的27名AT(年龄 = 34 ± 10岁;女性 = 15名,男性 = 12名)。

主要结局指标

我们使用半结构化访谈协议对参与者进行了访谈。在对每个工作环境进行共识定性研究过程后,三名研究人员对访谈记录进行了编码。通过多分析师三角测量、成员核对和内部审核实现了可信度。

结果

所有访谈中出现了四个领域:(1)工作环境,(2)基本特征和技能,(3)健康素养评估策略,以及(4)患者教育材料和提供方式。在工作环境方面,AT描述了不同环境下的患者负荷、跨专业关系和患者特征。不同环境下的基本特征和技能差异很大,AT需要根据不同的患者需求采用不同的策略。对于健康素养评估策略,AT没有正式评估健康素养,而是依赖于感知和假设。在患者教育材料和提供方式方面,描述了有效的数字信息和健康信息学策略。

结论

来自医生诊所、大学和中学环境的AT描述了使用各种策略来创建以患者为中心的环境。参与者分享了他们在不同工作环境中评估健康素养和提供患者教育的行为。

相似文献

1
Delivering Patient-Centered Care With Respect to Patient Education and Health Literacy in Athletic Training Job Settings.在运动训练工作环境中,提供以患者为中心的护理,注重患者教育和健康素养。
J Athl Train. 2025 Mar 1;60(3):259-272. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0148.24.
2
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
3
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
Gender differences in the context of interventions for improving health literacy in migrants: a qualitative evidence synthesis.移民健康素养提升干预措施背景下的性别差异:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD013302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013302.pub2.
6
Athletic Trainers' Perceptions of and Experiences With Professional Development Approaches for Enhancing Clinical Documentation.运动训练师对增强临床文档记录的专业发展方法的看法和经验。
J Athl Train. 2024 Aug 1;59(8):857-867. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0408.23.
7
Secondary School Athletic Trainers' Experiences Managing Workplace Organizational-Professional Conflict.中学体育教练处理工作场所组织-职业冲突的经历。
J Athl Train. 2024 Oct 1;59(10):1042-1049. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0627.23.
8
Athletic Trainers' Experiences With and Perceptions of Salary Negotiation Decision-Making During the Hiring Process.运动训练师在招聘过程中进行薪资谈判决策的经验和看法。
J Athl Train. 2024 Aug 1;59(8):868-883. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0313.23.
9
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
10
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Become a Health Literacy Champion: Strategies to Promote Health Literacy in Athletic Training.成为健康素养倡导者:在运动训练中促进健康素养的策略。
J Athl Train. 2024 May 1;59(5):428-437. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0390.23.
2
The Parent Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ-Parent). Adaptation and validity testing with parents of children with epilepsy.家长健康素养问卷(HLQ-Parent)。对癫痫患儿家长进行的改编及效度测试。
Scand J Public Health. 2024 Feb;52(1):39-47. doi: 10.1177/14034948221123436. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
3
Expanding the learning health system model to be health literate.将学习型健康系统模式扩展为具备健康素养的模式。
J Comp Eff Res. 2022 Oct;11(15):1079-1083. doi: 10.2217/cer-2022-0002. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
4
Preoperative Patient Education Programs for Orthopaedic Surgery: What Do the Programs Include? How Are They Delivered? What Are the Knowledge Gaps? A Scoping Review of 46 Studies.骨科手术术前患者教育计划:计划包括哪些内容?如何实施?存在哪些知识空白?46 项研究的范围综述。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2022 Sep;52(9):572-585. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2022.10614. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
5
Health Literacy Among University Students: A Systematic Review of Cross-Sectional Studies.大学生健康素养:横断面研究的系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jan 21;9:680999. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.680999. eCollection 2021.
6
The Quintuple Aim for Health Care Improvement: A New Imperative to Advance Health Equity.医疗保健改善的五大目标:促进健康公平的新要务。
JAMA. 2022 Feb 8;327(6):521-522. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.25181.
7
Social Determinants of Health: Considerations for Athletic Health Care.社会决定因素与健康:运动员健康照护相关考量。
J Athl Train. 2022 Jun 1;57(6):521-531. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0010.21.
8
Trends of global health literacy research (1995-2020): Analysis of mapping knowledge domains based on citation data mining.全球健康素养研究趋势(1995-2020):基于引文数据挖掘的知识领域图谱分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 9;16(8):e0254988. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254988. eCollection 2021.
9
Which criteria characterize a health literate health care organization? - a scoping review on organizational health literacy.哪些标准可以体现一个有文化素养的医疗机构?——一个关于组织文化素养的范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 6;21(1):664. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06604-z.
10
Updating Health Literacy for Healthy People 2030: Defining Its Importance for a New Decade in Public Health.更新健康素养以实现 2030 年健康人群:为公共卫生新时代定义其重要性。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2021;27(Suppl 6):S258-S264. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001324.