• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用火病个性量表评估火病易感性:机器学习方法的比较研究

Assessing Hwa-byung Vulnerability Using the Hwa-byung Personality Scale: a comparative study of machine learning approaches.

作者信息

Kwon Chan-Young, Lee Boram, Kim Sung-Hee, Jeong Seok Chan, Kim Jong-Woo

机构信息

Department of Oriental Neuropsychiatry, College of Korean Medicine, Dong-Eui University, Busan, Republic of Korea.

KM Science Research Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Pharmacopuncture. 2024 Dec 31;27(4):358-366. doi: 10.3831/KPI.2024.27.4.358.

DOI:10.3831/KPI.2024.27.4.358
PMID:39741572
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11656055/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To develop and compare machine learning models to classify individuals vulnerable to Hwa-byung (HB) using an existing HB personality scale and to evaluate the efficacy of these models in predicting HB vulnerability.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 500 Korean adults (aged 19-44) using HB personality and symptom scales. We used various machine learning techniques, including the random forest classifier (RFC), XGBoost classifier, logistic regression, and their ensemble method (RFC-XGC-LR). The models were developed using recursive feature elimination with cross-validation for feature selection and evaluated using multiple performance metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

RESULTS

The 16 items on the HB personality scale were identified as optimal features to predict high HB symptom scores requiring further clinical evaluation. The ensemble model slightly outperformed the other models, with an accuracy of 0.80 and an AUROC of 0.86, in the test set. Notably, item 16 ("") of the HB personality scale showed the greatest importance in predicting HB vulnerability across all models. Although all models showed consistent performance across training, validation, and test sets, the RFC model exhibited signs of slight overfitting, with a higher AUROC of 0.97 in the training dataset compared to 0.85 in the validation and 0.86 in the test datasets.

CONCLUSION

Machine learning models, particularly the ensemble method, show capabilities promising for screening individuals with high HB symptom scores based on personality traits, potentially facilitating early referral for clinical evaluation. These models can improve the efficiency and accuracy of the HB risk assessment in clinical settings, potentially aiding early intervention and prevention strategies.

摘要

目的

利用现有的火病(HB)人格量表开发并比较用于对易患火病的个体进行分类的机器学习模型,并评估这些模型在预测火病易感性方面的效果。

方法

我们使用火病的人格和症状量表分析了500名韩国成年人(年龄在19 - 44岁之间)的数据。我们采用了各种机器学习技术,包括随机森林分类器(RFC)、XGBoost分类器、逻辑回归及其集成方法(RFC - XGC - LR)。这些模型通过递归特征消除和交叉验证进行特征选择来开发,并使用多种性能指标进行评估,包括准确率、精确率、召回率、特异性以及受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)。

结果

火病人格量表上的16个项目被确定为预测需要进一步临床评估的高火病症状评分的最佳特征。在测试集中,集成模型略优于其他模型,准确率为0.80,AUROC为0.86。值得注意的是,火病人格量表的第16项(“”)在所有模型中预测火病易感性方面显示出最大的重要性。尽管所有模型在训练集、验证集和测试集上表现一致,但RFC模型表现出轻微的过拟合迹象,训练数据集中的AUROC为0.97,而验证集中为0.85,测试数据集中为0.86。

结论

机器学习模型,特别是集成方法,显示出基于人格特质筛选高火病症状评分个体的潜力,有望促进早期转介进行临床评估。这些模型可以提高临床环境中火病风险评估的效率和准确性,可能有助于早期干预和预防策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be8/11656055/17e9f4992569/jop-27-4-358-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be8/11656055/5813843e0d0e/jop-27-4-358-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be8/11656055/a8a606d6ec3f/jop-27-4-358-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be8/11656055/ba187311a31d/jop-27-4-358-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be8/11656055/17e9f4992569/jop-27-4-358-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be8/11656055/5813843e0d0e/jop-27-4-358-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be8/11656055/a8a606d6ec3f/jop-27-4-358-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be8/11656055/ba187311a31d/jop-27-4-358-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be8/11656055/17e9f4992569/jop-27-4-358-f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing Hwa-byung Vulnerability Using the Hwa-byung Personality Scale: a comparative study of machine learning approaches.使用火病个性量表评估火病易感性:机器学习方法的比较研究
J Pharmacopuncture. 2024 Dec 31;27(4):358-366. doi: 10.3831/KPI.2024.27.4.358.
2
Development of a Short-Form Hwa-Byung Symptom Scale Using Machine Learning Approaches.运用机器学习方法开发简版火病症状量表
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Oct 30;14(21):2419. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14212419.
3
Differences in temperament and character dimensions of personality between patients with Hwa-byung, an anger syndrome, and patients with major depressive disorder.愤怒综合征 Hwa-byung 患者与重性抑郁症患者的气质和性格维度的人格差异。
J Affect Disord. 2012 Apr;138(1-2):110-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.12.014. Epub 2012 Jan 28.
4
Comparative Analysis of Emotional Symptoms in Elderly Koreans with Hwa-Byung and Depression.韩国老年人群中花病与抑郁症患者情感症状的比较分析
Psychiatry Investig. 2017 Nov;14(6):864-870. doi: 10.4306/pi.2017.14.6.864. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
5
Posttraumatic Embitterment Disorder and Hwa-byung in the General Korean Population.韩国普通人群中的创伤后痛苦障碍与火病
Psychiatry Investig. 2017 Jul;14(4):392-399. doi: 10.4306/pi.2017.14.4.392. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
6
Symptoms to use for diagnostic criteria of hwa-byung, an anger syndrome.用于愤怒综合征(hwa-byung)诊断标准的症状。
Psychiatry Investig. 2009 Mar;6(1):7-12. doi: 10.4306/pi.2009.6.1.7. Epub 2009 Mar 31.
7
Effectiveness of mind-body medicine for Hwa-Byung (a Korean cultural diagnosis of suppressed anger): A systematic review of interventional studies.身心医学治疗 Hwa-Byung(一种被压抑的愤怒的韩国文化诊断)的有效性:干预性研究的系统评价。
Complement Ther Med. 2024 Mar;80:103016. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2024.103016. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
8
A Review of the Korean Cultural Syndrome Hwa-Byung: Suggestions for Theory and Intervention.韩国文化综合征“火病”综述:理论与干预建议
Asia Taepyongyang Sangdam Yongu. 2014 Jan;4(1):49. doi: 10.18401/2014.4.1.4.
9
The anger syndrome hwa-byung and its comorbidity.愤怒综合征(Hwa-Byung)及其共病。
J Affect Disord. 2010 Jul;124(1-2):211-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.10.011. Epub 2009 Nov 1.
10
Efficacy and Safety of Virtual Reality-Based Versus Traditional Emotion-to-Emotion Therapy for Treatment of Hwa-Byung: A Protocol for a Single-Center, Randomized, Assessor-Blind, Parallel-Group Clinical Trial.基于虚拟现实与传统情感对情感疗法治疗火病的疗效和安全性:一项单中心、随机、评估者盲法、平行组临床试验方案
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Nov 30;12(23):2407. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12232407.

本文引用的文献

1
Subjective Perceptions of 'Meaning of Work' of Generation MZ Employees of South Korean NGOs.韩国非政府组织千禧一代员工对“工作意义”的主观认知
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jun 2;13(6):461. doi: 10.3390/bs13060461.
2
Machine learning-based predictive models for the occurrence of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: model development and validation.基于机器学习的痴呆行为和心理症状发生预测模型:模型开发和验证。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 18;13(1):8073. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35194-5.
3
Accurate Classification and Prediction of Acute Myocardial Infarction through an ARMD Procedure.
通过 ARMD 程序进行急性心肌梗死的准确分类和预测。
J Proteome Res. 2023 Mar 3;22(3):758-767. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.2c00488. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
4
A multicenter registry of neuropsychiatric outpatients in Korean medicine hospitals (KMental): Protocol of a prospective, multicenter, registry study.一项针对韩国医学医院(KMental)神经精神科门诊患者的多中心登记研究(KMental):一项前瞻性、多中心登记研究的方案。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Dec 9;101(49):e32151. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032151.
5
Differential Performance of Machine Learning Models in Prediction of Procedure-Specific Outcomes.机器学习模型在预测特定手术结局方面的差异性表现。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Aug;26(8):1732-1742. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05332-x. Epub 2022 May 4.
6
Machine Learning-Based Prediction Models for Different Clinical Risks in Different Hospitals: Evaluation of Live Performance.基于机器学习的不同医院不同临床风险预测模型:现场性能评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jun 7;24(6):e34295. doi: 10.2196/34295.
7
Combining machine learning and conventional statistical approaches for risk factor discovery in a large cohort study.结合机器学习和传统统计方法在大型队列研究中发现风险因素。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 26;11(1):22997. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02476-9.
8
Experiences of Self-Criticism and Self-Compassion in People Diagnosed With Cancer: A Multimethod Qualitative Study.癌症确诊患者的自我批评与自我同情体验:一项多方法质性研究
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 13;12:737725. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.737725. eCollection 2021.
9
Does Young Adults' Neighborhood Environment Affect Their Depressive Mood? Insights from the 2019 Korean Community Health Survey.年轻人的邻里环境会影响他们的抑郁情绪吗?来自 2019 年韩国社区健康调查的见解。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 31;18(3):1269. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031269.
10
Sample size, power and effect size revisited: simplified and practical approaches in pre-clinical, clinical and laboratory studies.样本量、功效和效应量再探:临床前、临床和实验室研究中简化而实用的方法。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2021 Feb 15;31(1):010502. doi: 10.11613/BM.2021.010502. Epub 2020 Dec 15.