• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用视觉方法进一步加强定性证据综合分析。

Using visual methods to further enhance qualitative evidence synthesis.

作者信息

Silveira Bianchim Mayara, France Emma F, Noyes Jane

机构信息

School of Medical and Health Sciences Bangor University Bangor UK.

Centre for Healthcare and Community Research, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport University of Stirling Stirling UK.

出版信息

Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2024 Dec;2(12):e70009. doi: 10.1002/cesm.70009. Epub 2024 Dec 22.

DOI:10.1002/cesm.70009
PMID:39758428
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11698405/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of visual methods in qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) adds a valuable dimension to the synthesis process by enhancing understanding and knowledge generation. Visual methods are currently underused and underreported in QES.

METHODS

This is the first study to describe accessible visual methods that support various stages of QES and to show the application of visual methods to a Cochrane QES of 43 studies using meta-ethnography and systematic review methods. This study also addresses the involvement of stakeholders including the public, practical considerations of equity, diversity, inclusion, and reflexivity in the selection and application of visual methods.

RESULTS

In a novel approach, the review authors utilized a combination of remote and in-person visual methods to initiate and develop their synthesis, involving stakeholders throughout the process. The review authors used methods including paper labels, cartoons, infographics, virtual whiteboards, and diagrams. The rigorous use of visual methods in the QES facilitated data visualization, remote analysis meetings, interpretation of extensive data, and meaningful patient and public involvement.

CONCLUSION

QES authors are encouraged to consider the use of visual methods, particularly when involving the public in the synthesis process. When selecting visual methods, authors should consider how they align with the study's objectives, suit the stage of synthesis, might enhance analysis, their available resources, and the team's technical skills.

摘要

背景

在定性证据综合(QES)中使用可视化方法,通过增强理解和知识生成,为综合过程增添了有价值的维度。目前,可视化方法在QES中未得到充分利用且报道不足。

方法

本研究首次描述了支持QES各个阶段的易用可视化方法,并展示了可视化方法在一项使用元民族志和系统评价方法对43项研究进行的Cochrane QES中的应用。本研究还探讨了利益相关者的参与,包括公众、公平、多样性、包容性以及在可视化方法选择和应用中的反思性等实际考虑因素。

结果

采用一种新颖的方法,综述作者利用远程和现场可视化方法相结合的方式启动和开展他们的综合工作,在整个过程中让利益相关者参与其中。综述作者使用了包括纸质标签、漫画、信息图、虚拟白板和图表等方法。在QES中严格使用可视化方法有助于数据可视化、远程分析会议、对大量数据的解读以及患者和公众有意义的参与。

结论

鼓励QES作者考虑使用可视化方法,尤其是在让公众参与综合过程时。在选择可视化方法时,作者应考虑它们如何与研究目标相一致、适合综合阶段、可能增强分析效果、可用资源以及团队的技术技能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fee/11795983/9dff63b67368/CESM-2-e70009-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fee/11795983/590ba8576f92/CESM-2-e70009-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fee/11795983/41014cde3200/CESM-2-e70009-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fee/11795983/c79719b80b88/CESM-2-e70009-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fee/11795983/e37e94593091/CESM-2-e70009-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fee/11795983/0c667d1ac708/CESM-2-e70009-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fee/11795983/b22f8b8cdda7/CESM-2-e70009-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fee/11795983/5d32f425eda9/CESM-2-e70009-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fee/11795983/098fd3065802/CESM-2-e70009-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fee/11795983/d1712c7f656f/CESM-2-e70009-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fee/11795983/9dff63b67368/CESM-2-e70009-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fee/11795983/590ba8576f92/CESM-2-e70009-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fee/11795983/41014cde3200/CESM-2-e70009-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fee/11795983/c79719b80b88/CESM-2-e70009-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fee/11795983/e37e94593091/CESM-2-e70009-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fee/11795983/0c667d1ac708/CESM-2-e70009-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fee/11795983/b22f8b8cdda7/CESM-2-e70009-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fee/11795983/5d32f425eda9/CESM-2-e70009-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fee/11795983/098fd3065802/CESM-2-e70009-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fee/11795983/d1712c7f656f/CESM-2-e70009-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fee/11795983/9dff63b67368/CESM-2-e70009-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Using visual methods to further enhance qualitative evidence synthesis.运用视觉方法进一步加强定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2024 Dec;2(12):e70009. doi: 10.1002/cesm.70009. Epub 2024 Dec 22.
2
Gender differences in the context of interventions for improving health literacy in migrants: a qualitative evidence synthesis.移民健康素养提升干预措施背景下的性别差异:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD013302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013302.pub2.
3
Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in evidence synthesis: how the PatMed study approached embedding audience responses into the expression of a meta-ethnography.患者和公众参与(PPI)在证据综合中的应用:PatMed 研究如何将受众反馈纳入元分析表达的方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Feb 10;20(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-0918-2.
4
Qualitative Evidence Synthesis (QES) for Guidelines: Paper 2 - Using qualitative evidence synthesis findings to inform evidence-to-decision frameworks and recommendations.定性证据综合(QES)在指南中的应用:第 2 篇 - 使用定性证据综合研究结果来为证据决策框架和建议提供信息。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Aug 8;17(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0468-4.
5
Qualitative Evidence Synthesis (QES) for Guidelines: Paper 3 - Using qualitative evidence syntheses to develop implementation considerations and inform implementation processes.定性证据综合 (QES) 指南:第 3 篇——利用定性证据综合来制定实施注意事项并为实施过程提供信息。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Aug 8;17(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0450-1.
6
Qualitative Evidence Synthesis (QES) for Guidelines: Paper 1 - Using qualitative evidence synthesis to inform guideline scope and develop qualitative findings statements.指南的定性证据综合(QES):第 1 篇——使用定性证据综合来为指南范围提供信息并制定定性发现陈述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Aug 8;17(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0467-5.
7
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
8
[Introduction to qualitative evidence synthesis - Variants and application].[定性证据综合的介绍——变体与应用]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2024 Aug;63(4):238-246. doi: 10.1055/a-2263-1270. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
9
Structured methodology review identified seven (RETREAT) criteria for selecting qualitative evidence synthesis approaches.结构方法学综述确定了选择定性证据综合方法的七个(RETREAT)标准。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Jul;99:41-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
10
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.

引用本文的文献

1
Gender differences in the context of interventions for improving health literacy in migrants: a qualitative evidence synthesis.移民健康素养提升干预措施背景下的性别差异:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD013302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013302.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding how children and young people with chronic non-cancer pain and their families experience living with pain, pain management and services: a meta-ethnography.理解患有慢性非癌症疼痛的儿童和青少年及其家庭的疼痛体验、疼痛管理和服务:一项荟萃民族志研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(17):1-218. doi: 10.3310/UTPM7986.
2
A meta-ethnography of how children and young people with chronic non-cancer pain and their families experience and understand their condition, pain services, and treatments.儿童和青少年慢性非癌症疼痛及其家庭对自身状况、疼痛服务和治疗的体验和理解的元人种学研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 5;10(10):CD014873. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014873.pub2.
3
Storyboarding HIV Infected Young People's Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy in Lower- to Upper Middle-Income Countries: A New-Materialist Qualitative Evidence Synthesis.
为中低收入国家受 HIV 感染的年轻人制定抗逆转录病毒治疗依从性的情节串联图板:一种新物质主义定性证据综合。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 8;19(18):11317. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811317.
4
Take a picture! The role of visual methods in understanding psychiatric patient's everyday life.拍张照片!视觉方法在理解精神科患者日常生活中的作用。
Acta Biomed. 2021 Jul 29;92(S2):e2021028. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92iS2.11945.
5
Use of infographics as a health-related knowledge translation tool: protocol for a scoping review.使用信息图作为健康相关知识转化工具:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 16;11(6):e046117. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046117.
6
Enhancing Public Health Systematic Reviews With Diagram Visualization.通过图表可视化提升公共卫生系统评价
Am J Public Health. 2021 Jun;111(6):1029-1034. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306225.
7
Visual Participatory Analysis: A Qualitative Method for Engaging Participants in Interpreting the Results of Randomized Controlled Trials of Health Interventions.视觉参与式分析:一种让参与者参与解读健康干预随机对照试验结果的定性方法。
J Mix Methods Res. 2021 Jan;15(1):18-36. doi: 10.1177/1558689820914806. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
8
Facilitating Interviews in Qualitative Research With Visual Tools: A Typology.运用视觉工具促进定性研究中的访谈:一种类型学。
Qual Health Res. 2019 Jan;29(2):301-310. doi: 10.1177/1049732318786485. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
9
A review of the issues and challenges involved in using participant-produced photographs in nursing research.护理研究中使用参与者拍摄照片所涉及的问题与挑战综述。
J Adv Nurs. 2015 Jul;71(7):1726-37. doi: 10.1111/jan.12627. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
10
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of lay health worker programmes to improve access to maternal and child health: qualitative evidence synthesis.实施非专业卫生工作者项目以改善孕产妇和儿童健康服务可及性的障碍与促进因素:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 8;2013(10):CD010414. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010414.pub2.