• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国免疫实践专家委员会的结构、职责及程序。

The structure, role, and procedures of Korean expert committee on immunization practices.

作者信息

Lim So Yun, Kim Han Wool, Choe Young June, Ahn Bin, Kang Hyun Mi, Park Jiyoung, Kwon Geun Yong, Lee Seung Ho, Kwon Sunghee, Choi Eun Hwa

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Pediatrics, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Vaccine X. 2024 Dec 10;22:100601. doi: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2024.100601. eCollection 2025 Jan.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvacx.2024.100601
PMID:39759569
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11700290/
Abstract

Vaccination is a cornerstone of public health, preventing infectious diseases with significant contribution to human health. In South Korea, the Korea Expert Committee on Immunization Practices (KECIP) plays a pivotal role in guiding national vaccination policies. In this comprehensive review, we investigated the history, legal basis, operation, and achievements of the KECIP, highlighting its critical role in shaping the country's successful vaccination program. We analyze the KECIP's diverse responsibilities, including deliberating on national immunization programs, establishing vaccination criteria, managing targeted infectious diseases, and formulating eradication strategies. Also, we revealed its well-defined structure, specialized subcommittees, and ethical protocols that ensure transparency and integrity. Furthermore, we explored the KECIP's strategic evolution, showcasing its contributions to expanding vaccine coverage, implementing emergency approvals, and optimizing foundational vaccinations for all age groups as well as special populations including immunocompromised individuals. By combining scientific rigor, expert insights, and a commitment to public health, the KECIP had navigated the dynamic landscape of infectious disease control, contributing significantly to South Korea's impressive vaccination achievements.

摘要

疫苗接种是公共卫生的基石,对预防传染病、维护人类健康具有重大意义。在韩国,韩国免疫实践专家委员会(KECIP)在指导国家疫苗接种政策方面发挥着关键作用。在本全面综述中,我们调查了KECIP的历史、法律依据、运作情况及成就,突出了其在塑造该国成功的疫苗接种计划中所起的关键作用。我们分析了KECIP的多项职责,包括审议国家免疫计划、制定疫苗接种标准、管理目标传染病以及制定根除策略。此外,我们还揭示了其明确的架构、专门的小组委员会以及确保透明度和廉正性的道德规范。再者,我们探讨了KECIP的战略演变,展示了其在扩大疫苗接种覆盖范围、实施紧急批准以及优化所有年龄组和包括免疫功能低下个体在内的特殊人群的基础疫苗接种方面所做的贡献。通过结合科学严谨性、专家见解以及对公共卫生的承诺,KECIP应对了传染病控制的动态形势,为韩国令人瞩目的疫苗接种成就做出了重大贡献。

相似文献

1
The structure, role, and procedures of Korean expert committee on immunization practices.韩国免疫实践专家委员会的结构、职责及程序。
Vaccine X. 2024 Dec 10;22:100601. doi: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2024.100601. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Expert Consensus on the Structure, Role, and Procedures of the Korea Expert Committee on Immunization Practices.韩国免疫实践专家委员会的结构、角色和程序的专家共识。
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Jun 3;39(21):e166. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e166.
3
An overview of the national immunization policy making process: the role of the Korea expert committee on immunization practices.国家免疫政策制定过程概述:韩国免疫实践专家委员会的作用。
Korean J Pediatr. 2012 Jan;55(1):1-5. doi: 10.3345/kjp.2012.55.1.1. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
4
Strengthening vaccination policies in Latin America: an evidence-based approach.加强拉丁美洲的疫苗接种政策:循证方法。
Vaccine. 2013 Aug 20;31(37):3826-33. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.12.062. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
5
General recommendations on immunization --- recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).一般预防接种建议——免疫实施咨询委员会(ACIP)的建议。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2011 Jan 28;60(2):1-64.
6
Successful introduction of an underutilized elderly pneumococcal vaccine in a national immunization program by integrating the pre-existing public health infrastructure.通过整合现有的公共卫生基础设施,在国家免疫规划中成功引入一种未得到充分利用的老年肺炎球菌疫苗。
Vaccine. 2016 Mar 18;34(13):1623-1629. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.01.043. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
7
Toward better pandemic governance and preparedness: South Korea's whole-of-nation approach to COVID-19.迈向更好的大流行治理和防范:韩国应对 COVID-19 的全民方法。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 6;24(1):2126. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19655-8.
8
Recommendations for using smallpox vaccine in a pre-event vaccination program. Supplemental recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC).在事件前疫苗接种计划中使用天花疫苗的建议。免疫实践咨询委员会(ACIP)和医疗保健感染控制实践咨询委员会(HICPAC)的补充建议。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2003 Apr 4;52(RR-7):1-16.
9
Calling the shots: immunization finance policies and practices. Executive summary of the report of the Institute of Medicine.掌控局面:免疫接种筹资政策与实践。医学研究所报告执行摘要
Am J Prev Med. 2000 Oct;19(3 Suppl):4-12. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00212-9.
10
[The new National Immunization Program 2017-2019 and the Essential Care Levels: what is going to change?].[2017 - 2019年新国家免疫规划与基本医疗水平:将会发生哪些变化?]
Ig Sanita Pubbl. 2017 Sep-Oct;73(5):405-418.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Vaccines; Health, Economic and Social Perspectives.疫苗的影响;健康、经济和社会视角。
Front Microbiol. 2020 Jul 14;11:1526. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01526. eCollection 2020.
2
Safety and immunogenicity of influenza A(H5N1) vaccine stored up to twelve years in the National Pre-Pandemic Influenza Vaccine Stockpile (NPIVS).国家大流行流感疫苗储备库中保存长达 12 年的甲型 H5N1 流感疫苗的安全性和免疫原性。
Vaccine. 2019 Jan 14;37(3):435-443. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.11.069. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
3
Ranking 93 health interventions for low- and middle-income countries by cost-effectiveness.
按成本效益对低收入和中等收入国家的93项卫生干预措施进行排名。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 10;12(8):e0182951. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182951. eCollection 2017.
4
The development of global vaccine stockpiles.全球疫苗储备的发展。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Mar;15(3):340-7. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70999-5. Epub 2015 Feb 6.
5
Supporting countries in establishing and strengthening NITAGs: lessons learned from 5 years of the SIVAC initiative.支持各国建立和加强国家免疫技术咨询小组:从SIVAC倡议5年中汲取的经验教训。
Vaccine. 2015 Jan 29;33(5):588-95. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.12.026. Epub 2014 Dec 26.
6
Comparison of NITAG policies and working processes in selected developed countries.部分发达国家国家免疫技术咨询小组(NITAG)政策与工作流程比较
Vaccine. 2015 Jan 1;33(1):3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.09.023. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
7
National Advisory Groups and their role in immunization policy-making processes in European countries.国家咨询小组及其在欧洲国家免疫政策制定过程中的作用。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013 Dec;19(12):1096-105. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12315. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
8
Lessons from the eradication of smallpox: an interview with D. A. Henderson.从消灭天花中吸取的教训:对 D. A. 亨德森的采访。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Jun 24;368(1623):20130113. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0113. Print 2013 Aug 5.
9
Cost-effectiveness and economic benefits of vaccines in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.中低收入国家疫苗的成本效益和经济效益:系统评价。
Vaccine. 2012 Dec 17;31(1):96-108. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.10.103. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
10
ACAM2000: the new smallpox vaccine for United States Strategic National Stockpile.ACAM2000:用于美国国家战略储备的新型天花疫苗。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2010 May 25;4:71-9. doi: 10.2147/dddt.s3687.