• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于评估2型糖尿病风险认知的马来语版问卷(RPDM)的开发与验证

Development and validation of a Malay version questionnaire for assessing risk perception of type 2 diabetes (RPDM).

作者信息

Jane Ling Miaw Yn, Ahmad Norfazilah, Mohd Radi Mohd Firdaus, Aizuddin Azimatun Noor

机构信息

Department of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Medical Development Division, Ministry of Health, Putrajaya, Malaysia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jan 7;20(1):e0311834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311834. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0311834
PMID:39775213
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11706471/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The burden of type 2 diabetes is increasing globally. Risk perception of type 2 diabetes plays an important role in motivating adoption of healthy lifestyle and preventive health interventions. To address the increasing burden of type 2 diabetes in Malaysia, a better understanding on its risk perception is needed as a guide for preventive interventions. This study was aimed at developing and validating a Malay-language questionnaire to assess the risk perception of type 2 diabetes (RPDM) among Malaysians.

METHODS

The questionnaire (RPDM) was developed based on the Health Belief Model and previous literature. A 59-item question pool was initially developed, reviewed by experts for content validity and pretested on five respondents. Different samples were used for pilot study (n = 100) and subsequent validation study (n = 158). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to evaluate construct validity and construct reliability of the questionnaire.

RESULTS

The EFA yielded five-factors model, including 48 items with good factor loadings of > 0.40. CFA was carried out using item parceling. The final model shows acceptable model fit and had sufficient convergent and discriminant validity. The value of construct reliability ranged between 0.76 and 0.90.

CONCLUSION

This newly developed and validated Malay-language RPDM questionnaire is valid and reliable for measuring the five constructs (perceived self-efficacy, perceived severity, perceived benefit, perceived susceptibility and perceived barrier) of risk perception of type 2 diabetes among Malaysians. This Malay-language questionnaire may contribute to a better understanding of risk perception of type 2 diabetes among Malaysians, as well as enhancement of diabetes prevention communication between healthcare providers and their clients.

摘要

背景

2型糖尿病的全球负担正在增加。2型糖尿病的风险认知在促使人们采取健康生活方式和预防性健康干预措施方面发挥着重要作用。为应对马来西亚2型糖尿病日益加重的负担,需要更好地了解其风险认知,以此作为预防性干预措施的指导。本研究旨在开发并验证一份马来语问卷,以评估马来西亚人对2型糖尿病的风险认知(RPDM)。

方法

问卷(RPDM)基于健康信念模型和以往文献编制。最初编制了一个包含59个条目的问题池,经专家审查内容效度,并在5名受访者中进行预测试。不同样本用于预试验(n = 100)和后续验证研究(n = 158)。采用探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)来评估问卷的结构效度和结构信度。

结果

EFA得出五因素模型,包括48个条目,因子载荷> 0.40,效果良好。使用项目打包法进行CFA。最终模型显示模型拟合度可接受,具有足够的收敛效度和区分效度。结构信度值在0.76至0.90之间。

结论

这份新开发并验证的马来语RPDM问卷在测量马来西亚人对2型糖尿病风险认知的五个结构(感知自我效能、感知严重性、感知益处、感知易感性和感知障碍)方面是有效且可靠的。这份马来语问卷可能有助于更好地了解马来西亚人对2型糖尿病的风险认知,以及加强医疗服务提供者与其客户之间关于糖尿病预防的沟通。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a735/11706471/abc6d32f5089/pone.0311834.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a735/11706471/3206e75ccdbe/pone.0311834.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a735/11706471/abc6d32f5089/pone.0311834.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a735/11706471/3206e75ccdbe/pone.0311834.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a735/11706471/abc6d32f5089/pone.0311834.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a Malay version questionnaire for assessing risk perception of type 2 diabetes (RPDM).用于评估2型糖尿病风险认知的马来语版问卷(RPDM)的开发与验证
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 7;20(1):e0311834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311834. eCollection 2025.
2
The Malay-Version Knowledge, Risk Perception, Attitude and Practice Questionnaire on Heatwaves: Development and Construct Validation.马来文热浪知识、风险认知、态度和实践问卷:编制与结构效度验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 17;19(4):2279. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042279.
3
Development and validation of COVID-19 vaccination perception (CoVaP) instrument among healthcare workers in Malaysia.马来西亚医护人员中COVID-19疫苗接种认知(CoVaP)工具的开发与验证
PeerJ. 2025 Apr 23;13:e19318. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19318. eCollection 2025.
4
Psychometric properties of the Malay version of the diabetes empowerment scale among hospital Serdang type 2 diabetes mellitus patients using exploratory factor analysis.采用探索性因子分析对沙登 2 型糖尿病患者进行马来语版糖尿病能力量表的心理测量特性研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Feb 7;18(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-1280-0.
5
Adaption, translation and validation of the Diabetes Mellitus in the Offspring Questionnaire (DMOQ): The Malay version.《后代糖尿病问卷》(DMOQ)的改编、翻译及验证:马来语版本
Med J Malaysia. 2018 Feb;73(1):16-24.
6
Validity and reliability of the patient assessment on chronic illness care (PACIC) questionnaire: the Malay version.慢性病照护患者评估问卷(PACIC)的效度与信度:马来语版本
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jul 19;19(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0807-5.
7
A unique double tango: Construct validation and reliability analysis of risk perception, attitude and practice (RPAP) questionnaire on dengue infection.一种独特的双重探戈:登革热感染风险认知、态度与行为(RPAP)问卷的结构效度和信度分析
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 24;16(8):e0256636. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256636. eCollection 2021.
8
Validity and Reliability of the Newly Developed Malay-Language Health Belief of Bloating (HB-Bloat) Scale.新开发的马来语腹胀健康信念量表(HB-Bloat)的有效性和可靠性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 17;17(8):2773. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082773.
9
Validity and reliability of a Malay version of the brief illness perception questionnaire for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.2型糖尿病患者简短疾病认知问卷马来语版本的效度和信度
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Aug 3;17(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0394-5.
10
The Malay version of the attitudes and beliefs about cardiovascular disease (ABCD-M) risk questionnaire: a translation, reliability and validation study.马来文版心血管疾病态度与信念(ABCD-M)风险问卷:翻译、信度和效度研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jul 25;22(1):1412. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13811-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk perception and its predictors towards type 2 diabetes mellitus among students in Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.马来西亚国民大学学生对 2 型糖尿病的风险感知及其预测因素。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Oct 27;102(43):e35520. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035520.
2
Risk perception of non-communicable diseases: A systematic review on its assessment and associated factors.非传染性疾病风险感知:评估及其相关因素的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 1;18(6):e0286518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286518. eCollection 2023.
3
Developing and validating a questionnaire to assess an individual's perceived risk of four major non-communicable diseases in Myanmar.
开发和验证评估缅甸个体罹患四种主要非传染性疾病风险的问卷。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 27;16(4):e0234281. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234281. eCollection 2021.
4
Risk perception and knowledge regarding diabetes among offspring of type 2 diabetics at a tertiary institution.2 型糖尿病患者后代对糖尿病的风险感知和知识。
Med J Malaysia. 2020 Nov;75(6):655-659.
5
Global, regional, and national burden and trend of diabetes in 195 countries and territories: an analysis from 1990 to 2025.全球、地区和国家 195 个国家和地区的糖尿病负担和趋势:1990 年至 2025 年的分析。
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 8;10(1):14790. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71908-9.
6
A Systematic Review of the Economic Burden of Type 2 Diabetes in Malaysia.马来西亚 2 型糖尿病经济负担的系统评价
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 7;17(16):5723. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165723.
7
Perception of and risk factors for type 2 diabetes among students attending an upstate New York college: a pilot study.纽约州北部一所大学学生对2型糖尿病的认知及危险因素:一项试点研究。
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2020 Mar 30;12:25. doi: 10.1186/s13098-020-00535-1. eCollection 2020.
8
Global and regional estimates and projections of diabetes-related health expenditure: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition.全球及各区域糖尿病相关卫生支出估计和预测:国际糖尿病联盟糖尿病地图集第 9 版结果。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;162:108072. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108072. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
9
From Evidence to Policy: Economic Evaluations of Healthcare in Malaysia: A Systematic Review.从证据到政策:马来西亚医疗保健的经济评估:系统评价。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2020 May;21:91-99. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2019.09.002. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
10
Developing a Broadly Applicable Measure of Risk Perception.开发一种广泛适用的风险感知衡量标准。
Risk Anal. 2019 Apr;39(4):777-791. doi: 10.1111/risa.13207. Epub 2018 Oct 2.