Cebolla Hector, Martín Juan Carlos, Rodrigo María José
Instituto de Economía, Geografía y Demografía Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas Madrid Spain Instituto de Economía, Geografía y Demografía, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, Spain.
Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria Spain Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Psychosoc Interv. 2025 Jan 2;34(1):53-66. doi: 10.5093/pi2025a5. eCollection 2025 Jan.
This paper addresses a critical gap in family research by examining the risk of families with young children receiving the Minimum Living Income (MLI) in rejecting targeted social interventions, also known as non-take-up (NTU). We analyze recruting process data from the first invitation to participate in a social benefit including the "Growing Happily in the Family-2" program developed in Madrid, Spain, to their written consent prior to its implementation. Measurements of subjective factors reported as reasons for NTU and objective factors of sociodemographic characteristics and detailed household patterns of prior engagement with social services to study NTU response were based on official records and project data. Descriptive findings reveal that jobless parents with high economic hardship, poorer physical and mental health, heavy demanding childbearing, and poor family-job conciliation aggravated by adverse life events profile the NTU response. Linear probability models predicting the rejection/acceptance decision showed that lack of previous contact with the social services, younger parental age, male, and nonimmigrant status significantly elevate NTU risk. Notably, although a longer stay in social services increases the probability of NTU, this does not occur among the most vulnerable families that have received more intensive support, challenging the idea of intervention fatigue. These findings have implications for the design of policies and practices to support children and family as subjects of rights, underlining the need for preventive and capacity-building strategies that address specific barriers to program uptake. Overall, the study highlights innovation areas that lie in the interception of social and employment benefits to improve the reach of the intended population and the positive impact of parenting interventions aimed at supporting vulnerable families.
本文通过研究有幼儿的家庭领取最低生活收入(MLI)时拒绝定向社会干预(即不接受,NTU)的风险,填补了家庭研究中的一个关键空白。我们分析了从首次邀请参与一项社会福利(包括西班牙马德里开展的“家庭幸福成长 - 2”项目)到实施前书面同意的招募过程数据。以官方记录和项目数据为基础,测量被报告为不接受原因的主观因素以及社会人口特征的客观因素和先前参与社会服务的详细家庭模式,以研究不接受反应。描述性结果显示,经济困难程度高、身心健康状况较差、育儿负担重以及因不良生活事件而导致家庭 - 工作协调困难的失业父母呈现出不接受反应的特征。预测拒绝/接受决定的线性概率模型表明,与社会服务缺乏先前接触、父母年龄较小、男性以及非移民身份显著增加了不接受风险。值得注意的是,虽然在社会服务机构停留时间较长会增加不接受的可能性,但在接受了更密集支持的最脆弱家庭中并非如此,这对干预疲劳的观点提出了挑战。这些发现对支持儿童和家庭作为权利主体的政策和实践设计具有启示意义,强调需要制定预防性和能力建设战略,以解决项目接受方面的具体障碍。总体而言,该研究突出了创新领域,即截留社会和就业福利,以提高目标人群的覆盖面以及旨在支持弱势家庭的育儿干预措施的积极影响。