• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根管封闭剂对常见口腔病原菌抗菌效果的体外比较研究

Comparative in Vitro Study on the Antimicrobial Efficacy of Endodontic Sealers Against Common Oral Pathogens.

作者信息

Dudás Csaba, Bardocz-Veres Zsuzsanna, Gyulai Anita Iulia, Pop Silvia Izabella, Székely Melinda, Kerekes-Máthé Bernadette, Kovács Mónika

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, 38 Gh. Marinescu Str., 540139 Târgu Mureș, Romania.

Department of Oral Rehabilitation and Occlusology, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, 38 Gh. Marinescu Str., 540139 Târgu Mureș, Romania.

出版信息

Dent J (Basel). 2024 Dec 30;13(1):17. doi: 10.3390/dj13010017.

DOI:10.3390/dj13010017
PMID:39851593
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11763927/
Abstract

: Microorganisms are the leading cause of infections in the root canal system, contributing to the failure of endodontic treatments. This in vitro study aimed to compare the antimicrobial effects of four different endodontic sealers: Endomethasone N (Septodont, Saint Maur-des-Fossés, France), Sealapex (Kerr Corporation, Orange, CA, USA), AH Plus Jet (Dentsply DeTrey GmbH, Konstanz, Germany), and MTA Fillapex (Angelus, Londrina, Brazil). : The sealers were tested against common oral pathogens, including Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Candida albicans, and Streptococcus mutans, using the agar diffusion method. Inhibition zones were measured at 24, 48, and 72 h to assess antimicrobial efficacy. : The results showed that Endomethasone was the most effective sealer against all tested microorganisms, demonstrating consistent inhibition across all time intervals. MTA Fillapex also exhibited a significant antimicrobial effect, particularly against Streptococcus mutans, with its efficacy increasing over time. AH Plus Jet displayed limited effectiveness, showing significant results only against Staphylococcus aureus. Overall, this study confirms the superior antimicrobial performance of Endomethasone, while the other materials, particularly MTA Fillapex and Sealapex, also showed notable effects in experimental conditions. The antimicrobial activity of all materials, except AH Plus Jet, increased over the 72-h period.

摘要

微生物是根管系统感染的主要原因,导致牙髓治疗失败。本体外研究旨在比较四种不同根管封闭剂的抗菌效果:Endomethasone N(法国圣莫尔-德福尔塞Septodont公司)、Sealapex(美国加利福尼亚州奥兰治Kerr公司)、AH Plus Jet(德国康斯坦茨Dentsply DeTrey GmbH公司)和MTA Fillapex(巴西隆德里纳Angelus公司)。使用琼脂扩散法对这些封闭剂针对常见口腔病原体进行测试,这些病原体包括粪肠球菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、大肠杆菌、白色念珠菌和变形链球菌。在24、48和72小时测量抑菌圈以评估抗菌效果。结果表明,Endomethasone是针对所有测试微生物最有效的封闭剂,在所有时间间隔内均表现出持续的抑制作用。MTA Fillapex也表现出显著的抗菌效果,尤其是对变形链球菌,其效果随时间增加。AH Plus Jet显示出有限的有效性,仅对金黄色葡萄球菌有显著效果。总体而言,本研究证实了Endomethasone具有卓越的抗菌性能,而其他材料,特别是MTA Fillapex和Sealapex,在实验条件下也显示出显著效果。除AH Plus Jet外,所有材料的抗菌活性在72小时内均有所增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d902/11763927/b7252c059cfa/dentistry-13-00017-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d902/11763927/b7252c059cfa/dentistry-13-00017-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d902/11763927/b7252c059cfa/dentistry-13-00017-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative in Vitro Study on the Antimicrobial Efficacy of Endodontic Sealers Against Common Oral Pathogens.根管封闭剂对常见口腔病原菌抗菌效果的体外比较研究
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Dec 30;13(1):17. doi: 10.3390/dj13010017.
2
Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Efficacy of Endodontic Sealers Against Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus mutans: An In Vitro Study.根管封闭剂对金黄色葡萄球菌和变形链球菌抗菌效果的比较评价:一项体外研究
Cureus. 2025 Mar 11;17(3):e80435. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80435. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Antimicrobial Efficacy of Different Endodontic Sealers against : An Study.不同根管封闭剂的抗菌效果:一项研究。 (你提供的原文似乎不完整,“against”后面缺少具体内容)
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2018 Mar-Apr;8(2):104-109. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_29_18. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
4
Characterization of Leachates from 6 Root Canal Sealers.6 种根管封闭剂浸提液的特性分析。
J Endod. 2019 May;45(5):623-627. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
5
In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of a new resin-based endodontic sealer against endodontic pathogens.一种新型树脂基根管封闭剂对根管病原体抗菌活性的体外评价
J Oral Sci. 2008 Sep;50(3):309-13. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.50.309.
6
Incorporating Antimicrobial Nanomaterial and its Effect on the Antimicrobial Activity, Flow and Radiopacity of Endodontic Sealers.抗菌纳米材料的纳入及其对根管封闭剂抗菌活性、流动性和射线不透过性的影响。
Eur Endod J. 2017 Jul 6;2(1):1-6. doi: 10.14744/eej.2017.16029. eCollection 2017.
7
Influence of Commonly Used Endodontic Irrigants on the Setting Time and Metal Composition of Various Base Endodontic Sealers.常用根管冲洗剂对各种根管封闭剂凝固时间和金属成分的影响。
Polymers (Basel). 2021 Dec 22;14(1):27. doi: 10.3390/polym14010027.
8
Evaluating the antimicrobial effectiveness of endodontic sealers against oral pathogens associated with failed root canal treatments.评估根管封闭剂对与根管治疗失败相关的口腔病原体的抗菌效果。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 Mar;28(3):264-268. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_841_24. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
9
An Invitro Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy and Flow Characteristics for AH Plus, MTA Fillapex, CRCS and Gutta Flow 2 Root Canal Sealer.AH Plus、MTA Fillapex、CRCS和Gutta Flow 2根管封闭剂抗菌效果及流动性的体外评估
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Aug;10(8):ZC104-8. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/20885.8351. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
10
Antimicrobial efficacy of calcium silicate-based bioceramic sealers against and - An study.硅酸钙基生物陶瓷封闭剂对……和……的抗菌效果——一项……研究 (原文中部分内容缺失,导致翻译不够完整准确)
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Jul;27(7):737-742. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_215_24. Epub 2024 Jul 8.

本文引用的文献

1
The Push-Out Bond Strength, Surface Roughness, and Antimicrobial Properties of Endodontic Bioceramic Sealers Supplemented with Silver Nanoparticles.添加银纳米粒子的根管生物陶瓷密封剂的推出粘结强度、表面粗糙度和抗菌性能。
Molecules. 2024 Sep 18;29(18):4422. doi: 10.3390/molecules29184422.
2
Antibiofilm Efficacy of Calcium Silicate-Based Endodontic Sealers.硅酸钙基根管封闭剂的抗生物膜功效
Materials (Basel). 2024 Aug 8;17(16):3937. doi: 10.3390/ma17163937.
3
The Antibacterial Properties of a Reinforced Zinc Oxide Eugenol Combined with Cloisite 5A Nanoclay: An In-Vitro Study.
一种增强型氧化锌丁香酚与Cloisite 5A纳米粘土结合物的抗菌性能:一项体外研究。
J Funct Biomater. 2024 Jul 20;15(7):198. doi: 10.3390/jfb15070198.
4
Mechanical and Physicochemical Characteristics of a Novel Premixed Calcium Silicate Sealer.新型预混硅酸钙封闭剂的机械和物理化学特性
Materials (Basel). 2024 Jul 8;17(13):3374. doi: 10.3390/ma17133374.
5
Nanoarchitectonics-Based Materials as a Promising Strategy in the Treatment of Endodontic Infections.基于纳米结构技术的材料作为治疗牙髓感染的一种有前景的策略。
Pharmaceutics. 2024 Jun 4;16(6):759. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16060759.
6
Prevalence of and in endodontic retreatment Cases: A comprehensive study.根管再治疗病例中[具体内容缺失]和[具体内容缺失]的患病率:一项综合研究。
Saudi Dent J. 2024 Apr;36(4):539-545. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.01.009. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
7
Bacteria debridement efficacy of two sonic root canal irrigant activation systems.两种声波根管冲洗激活系统的细菌清创效果。
J Dent. 2024 Jan;140:104770. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104770. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
8
Endodontic Microbial Communities in Apical Periodontitis.根尖周炎中的牙髓微生物群落
J Endod. 2023 Feb;49(2):178-189. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2022.11.015. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
9
Synthesis of silver core-shell nanoparticles and their influence on an experimental resin endodontic sealer: An in vitro analysis.银核壳纳米颗粒的合成及其对实验性树脂根管封闭剂的影响:一项体外分析。
Int Endod J. 2023 Feb;56(2):289-303. doi: 10.1111/iej.13859. Epub 2022 Nov 13.
10
Present status and future directions: Minimally invasive root canal preparation and periradicular surgery.现状与未来方向:微创根管预备和根尖周手术。
Int Endod J. 2022 Oct;55 Suppl 4:845-871. doi: 10.1111/iej.13750. Epub 2022 Apr 29.