A national survey on gastroenterology and hepatology training reveals dissimilar perceptions between trainees and trainers and an important need for improvement in training programs.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to collect data on gastroenterology and hepatology training from the viewpoint of trainees and trainers.

METHODS

A national online survey was distributed among trainees and specialists at certified training institutions between February and May 2024.

RESULTS

Overall, 226 respondents - 98 trainees, 78 trainers, 50 program directors, and department heads responded, with a national coverage of 70% of trainees and 85% of specialty-department heads. A training curriculum was reported by 56% of trainees and 84% of curriculum organizers, regular feedback and training progress meetings by 11% of trainees (57% if considered without assessment of training progress), but 88% of curriculum organizers. Training was rated as very good or good by 65% of trainees, 79% of trainers, and 100% of department heads. Quality of functional diagnostics, endoscopy, and ultrasound training was rated as very good or good by trainees in 16, 61, and 54%, by trainers in 27, 79, and 58%, and by department heads in 74, 89, and 85%. Much agreement was found concerning the wish for external rotations (trainees 65%, trainers 70%, and department heads 89%) and a new postcertification advanced-endoscopy training and accreditation.

CONCLUSION

Department heads seem to overestimate the quality of their training programs. Consequently, we found large discrepancies in the perception of specialty training that should stimulate efforts to standardize training and boost necessary train-the-trainer programs. Diagnosis of functional gastrointestinal disorders and abdominal ultrasound skills are areas with the largest room for improvement. Increased flexibility of hospital providers will be crucial for significant improvement of external training possibilities.