Suppr超能文献

[Comparative study of cefaclor versus amoxicillin in urinary tract infections (author's transl)].

作者信息

Naber K, Kaldewey W

出版信息

Infection. 1979;7 Suppl 6:617-21. doi: 10.1007/BF01659750.

Abstract

In a comparative, prospective, open randomised clinical study, the efficacy and tolerance of cefaclor (3 x 500 mg) and amoxicillin (3 x 750 mg) in the treatment of urinary tract infection (UTI) were investigated and compared. A total of 110 patients (51 males and 59 females) age 10 to 83 years were treated for a period of five to 14 days (average 10 days). Fifty-nine of the patients had complicated, and 51 uncomplicated UTI. In all patients , organisms were cultured from the urine which were sensitive to both antibiotics in vitro. In each group there were three cases of mixed infection and 35 cases of Escherichia coli monoinfection. The distribution of pathogens in the other patients was likewise very similar. Better results, i.e. a reduction in the cell count to < 10(4)/ml immediately after completion of therapy, were obtained in patients treated with cefaclor. This is largely due to a statistically significantly higher rate of elimination in E. coli infections. The long-term results at follow-up examinations 14 to 60 days after completion of therapy in both groups with uncomplicated infections were, however, equally as good in about half the cases. In complicated infections therapy was successful overall in only about a quarter of the cases, better results being obtained in the amoxicillin group. It must be taken into account that among the patients treated, the groups with complicated UTI are difficult to compare, relapses primarily being determined by underlying disease. Both antibiotics were tolerated well.

摘要

相似文献

2
Comparative study of cefaclor and amoxicillin in treatment of urinary tract infection.
Urology. 1979 Sep;14(3):233-6. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(79)90489-8.
9
A double-blind study of cefaclor and amoxycillin in home and hospital-acquired infections.
Curr Med Res Opin. 1982;8(1):1-4. doi: 10.1185/03007998209109748.
10
Cefaclor versus ampicillin for outpatient treatment of urinary tract infections.
Am J Emerg Med. 1984 Jul;2(4):327-30. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(84)90128-1.

本文引用的文献

2
Pharmacokinetics of cefaclor in normal subjects and patients with chronic renal failure.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1977 Dec;12(6):730-2. doi: 10.1128/AAC.12.6.730.
3
Comparison of in vitro antibacterial activity of three oral cephalosporins: cefaclor, cephalexin, and cephradine.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1977 Nov;12(5):591-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.12.5.591.
4
In vitro activity of cefaclor, a new orally administered cephalosporin antibiotic.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1977 Sep;12(3):442-3. doi: 10.1128/AAC.12.3.442.
5
Concentration relationships of cefaclor in serum, interstitial fluid, bile, and urine of dogs.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Oct;14(4):614-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.14.4.614.
6
Pharmacology of cefaclor in normal volunteers and patients with renal failure.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Jun;13(6):951-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.13.6.951.
7
Stability and blood level determinations of cefaclor, a new oral cephalosporin antibiotic.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Jan;13(1):49-52. doi: 10.1128/AAC.13.1.49.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验