Kittayapong Pattamaporn, Ninphanomchai Suwannapa, Thayanukul Parinda, Yongyai Jiraporn, Limohpasmanee Wanitch
Center of Excellence for Vectors and Vector-Borne Diseases, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University at Salaya, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 12;20(2):e0314683. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314683. eCollection 2025.
Novel and alternative vector control approaches using a sterile male-based release to suppress Aedes aegypti mosquito vectors have recently been tested in the field in many countries. These approaches included the sterile insect technique (SIT), incompatible insect technique (IIT), and a combination of both techniques. In this study, we conducted a series of experiments to compare the quality between radiation-based and Wolbachia-induced sterile males in terms of flight ability, sterility, mating competitiveness, survival rate, and longevity. Aedes aegypti mosquitoes irradiated at 50 Gy (SIT) and those trans-infected with wAlbB Wolbachia (IIT) were used for quality comparison. Our results showed that irradiated and Wolbachia trans-infected males were not significantly different in flight ability (p > 0.05) and both could induce sterility in wild-type females. In addition, although irradiation at 50 Gy or Wolbachia trans-infection reduced male mating competitiveness, combined irradiation and Wolbachia wAlbB trans-infection increased male competitiveness at the one-to-one ratio. Increasing the number of sterile males released could compensate for reduced competitiveness but it does not make them more competitive. Irradiation did not affect the survival and longevity of irradiated males, but it showed significant negative impacts on females (p < 0.05); while the opposite was observed in the case of Wolbachia infection, i.e., with significant increase in the survival rate of Wolbachia trans-infected males (p < 0.05), but both survival and longevity were reduced in Wolbachia trans-infected females with no significant impacts (p > 0.05). In conclusion, neither irradiation nor Wolbachia trans-infection significantly affected the quality of sterile males except their mating competitiveness; but this could compensate by increasing the number of sterile males released. Sterility could be induced by either 50 Gy irradiation or wAlbB trans-infection. Mating competitiveness results showed that a higher number of sterile males produced by irradiation need to be released in comparison to those produced by Wolbachia trans-infection. Our results should be useful for planning SIT, IIT, or a combination for Ae. aegypti vector control.
最近,许多国家已在实地测试了使用基于不育雄蚊释放来抑制埃及伊蚊媒介的新型替代病媒控制方法。这些方法包括昆虫不育技术(SIT)、昆虫不相容技术(IIT)以及这两种技术的组合。在本研究中,我们进行了一系列实验,从飞行能力、不育性、交配竞争力、存活率和寿命方面比较基于辐射的不育雄蚊和沃尔巴克氏体诱导的不育雄蚊的质量。用50 Gy辐射处理的(SIT)埃及伊蚊和经wAlbB沃尔巴克氏体转染的(IIT)埃及伊蚊用于质量比较。我们的结果表明,经辐射处理的雄蚊和经沃尔巴克氏体转染的雄蚊在飞行能力上无显著差异(p>0.05),且二者均可使野生型雌蚊不育。此外,尽管50 Gy辐射或沃尔巴克氏体转染会降低雄蚊的交配竞争力,但辐射与沃尔巴克氏体wAlbB转染相结合可提高一对一比例下雄蚊的竞争力。增加不育雄蚊的释放数量可弥补竞争力的降低,但不会使其更具竞争力。辐射不影响经辐射处理雄蚊的存活和寿命,但对雌蚊有显著负面影响(p<0.05);而在沃尔巴克氏体感染的情况下则相反,即经沃尔巴克氏体转染的雄蚊存活率显著提高(p<0.05),但经沃尔巴克氏体转染的雌蚊的存活和寿命均降低,且无显著影响(p>0.05)。总之,除交配竞争力外,辐射和沃尔巴克氏体转染均未显著影响不育雄蚊的质量;但这可通过增加不育雄蚊的释放数量来弥补。50 Gy辐射或wAlbB转染均可诱导不育。交配竞争力结果表明,与经沃尔巴克氏体转染产生的不育雄蚊相比,经辐射产生的不育雄蚊需要释放更多数量。我们的结果应有助于规划针对埃及伊蚊病媒控制的昆虫不育技术、昆虫不相容技术或二者的组合。