Lu Jihong, Guo Shuhong, Liu Qiannan, Tursumamat Nafisa, Liu Shengyang, Wu Shuye, Li Heming, Wei Juan
Engineering Research Center of Cell and Therapeutic Antibody, Ministry of Education, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Antibody-Drug Conjugates with Innovative Target, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai, 200240, China.
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2025 Apr;417(10):1947-1959. doi: 10.1007/s00216-025-05778-3. Epub 2025 Feb 13.
The significance of glycans in various biological processes has been widely acknowledged. Quantitative glycomics is emerging as an important addition to clinical biomarker discovery, as it helps uncover disease-associated glycosylation patterns that are valuable for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment evaluation. Compared to glycoproteomics and other established omics approaches, quantitative glycomics exhibits greater methodological diversity and it encounters various challenges in automation and standardization. Nonetheless, numerous advancements have been made in this field over the past 5 years. Here, we have reviewed recent progress in analytical methods and software to improve mass spectrometry-based quantitative glycomics primarily on N- and O-glycosylation. The discussion is organized into four sections: stable isotopic labeling, isobaric labeling, label-free, and fluorescence labeling strategies, with a particular emphasis on quantitative data interpretation. Novel derivatization methods and advanced techniques have been developed for high-throughput and highly sensitive glycan quantification with high accuracy. However, due to variations in glycan derivatization and difficulties in structural identification, most glycomic quantification methods are tailored to specific applications, and manual inspection is frequently necessary for precise data interpretation. Therefore, further advancements in glycan sample preparation, structural characterization, and automated data interpretation are essential to facilitate comprehensive and accurate quantification across a wide array of glycans.
聚糖在各种生物学过程中的重要性已得到广泛认可。定量糖组学正在成为临床生物标志物发现的重要补充,因为它有助于揭示对疾病诊断、预后和治疗评估有价值的与疾病相关的糖基化模式。与糖蛋白质组学和其他成熟的组学方法相比,定量糖组学表现出更大的方法多样性,并且在自动化和标准化方面面临各种挑战。尽管如此,在过去5年里该领域已取得了许多进展。在此,我们综述了分析方法和软件方面的最新进展,以改进主要基于N-糖基化和O-糖基化的质谱定量糖组学。讨论分为四个部分:稳定同位素标记、等压标记、无标记和荧光标记策略,特别强调定量数据解释。已经开发了新的衍生化方法和先进技术,用于高通量、高灵敏度且高精度的聚糖定量。然而,由于聚糖衍生化的差异和结构鉴定的困难,大多数糖组定量方法是针对特定应用定制的,并且精确的数据解释通常需要人工检查。因此,聚糖样品制备、结构表征和自动化数据解释方面的进一步进展对于促进对各种聚糖进行全面准确的定量至关重要。