Oldenburg Niki, Mashek Douglas G, Harnack Lisa, Wang Qi, Manoogian Emily N C, Evanoff Nicholas, Dengel Donald R, Taddese Abdisa, Yentzer Brad P, Lysne Lesia, Wong Alison, Hanson Michelle, Anderson Julie D, Alvear Alison, LaPage Nicole, Ryder Justin, Varady Krista, Gao Zan, Ryu Suryeon, Bolan Patrick J, Bergman Bryan, Helgeson Erika, Panda Satchidananda, Chow Lisa S
Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2025 Apr;33(4):671-684. doi: 10.1002/oby.24252. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
Metabolic improvements may precede weight loss. We compared the effects of self-selected 8-h time-restricted eating (TRE), 15% caloric restriction (CR), and unrestricted eating (UE) on weight, body composition, caloric intake, glycemic measures, and metabolic flexibility.
In this 12-week randomized-controlled trial, we measured weight (primary outcome), body composition (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry/magnetic resonance imaging), caloric intake (24-h recall), metabolic flexibility (indirect calorimetry during hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp), and glycemic measures (hemoglobin A1c, hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp, continuous glucose monitoring).
Of the 88 enrolled participants, 81 (92%) completed the trial (mean [SD], age, 43.2 [10.5] years, BMI, 36.2 [5.1] kg/m; 54.5% female, 84.1% White). Final eating windows were 9.8 h (95% CI: 9.0 to 10.6) for TRE, 12.9 h (95% CI: 11.9 to 13.9) for CR, and 11.8 h (95% CI: 11.0 to 12.7) for UE. Compared with UE (n = 29), weight changes were -1.4 kg (95% CI: -4.5 to 1.7; p = 0.53) with TRE (n = 30) and -2.5 kg (95% CI: -5.8 to 0.8; p = 0.18) with CR (n = 29). TRE showed lower metabolic flexibility than CR (-0.041 [95% CI: -0.080 to -0.002]). Weight, body composition, caloric intake, and glycemic measures were similar among groups. Eating window reduction correlated with decreased caloric intake and visceral fat.
In a 12-week intervention, TRE did not lead to significant improvements in weight, average body composition, or glycemic or metabolic measures compared with CR or UE.
代谢改善可能先于体重减轻。我们比较了自行选择的8小时限时进食(TRE)、15%热量限制(CR)和自由进食(UE)对体重、身体成分、热量摄入、血糖指标和代谢灵活性的影响。
在这项为期12周的随机对照试验中,我们测量了体重(主要结局)、身体成分(双能X线吸收法/磁共振成像)、热量摄入(24小时回顾法)、代谢灵活性(高胰岛素-正常血糖钳夹期间的间接量热法)和血糖指标(糖化血红蛋白、高胰岛素-正常血糖钳夹、连续血糖监测)。
在88名入组参与者中,81名(92%)完成了试验(平均[标准差],年龄43.2[10.5]岁,BMI 36.2[5.1]kg/m²;54.5%为女性,84.1%为白人)。TRE组的最终进食窗口为9.8小时(95%CI:9.0至10.6),CR组为12.9小时(95%CI:11.9至13.9),UE组为11.8小时(95%CI:11.0至12.7)。与UE组(n = 29)相比,TRE组(n = 30)的体重变化为-1.4 kg(95%CI:-4.5至1.7;p = 0.53),CR组(n = 29)为-2.5 kg(95%CI:-5.8至0.8;p = 0.18)。TRE组的代谢灵活性低于CR组(-0.041[95%CI:-0.080至-0.002])。各组之间的体重、身体成分、热量摄入和血糖指标相似。进食窗口缩短与热量摄入减少和内脏脂肪减少相关。
在为期12周的干预中,与CR或UE相比,TRE在体重、平均身体成分或血糖或代谢指标方面未带来显著改善。