Mitchell D, Osborne E W, O'Boyle M W
Behav Neural Biol. 1985 Mar;43(2):212-7. doi: 10.1016/s0163-1047(85)91387-1.
Conflicting predictions of reinforcement and neophobia-arousal theories were evaluated in a simple choice task. Four groups of C57BL/6J mice were administered daily two-trial tests in a uniform T-maze for 10 consecutive days. For three groups, the contingencies of footshock treatments were manipulated to reinforce alternation, perseveration, or both. A control group that was not administered footshock alternated, but all three groups that were stressed perseverated more and more across tests, despite the differences in reinforcement contingencies. These results are inconsistent with the predictions of reinforcement theory but consistent with the view that stressed or aroused animals are neophobic and use nonassociative learning (habituation) to distinguish between novel and familiar alternatives.
在一项简单的选择任务中,对强化理论和新恐惧症唤醒理论的相互冲突的预测进行了评估。四组C57BL/6J小鼠在统一的T型迷宫中连续10天每天进行两次试验测试。对于三组小鼠,操纵电击处理的偶然性以强化交替、坚持或两者兼而有之。未接受电击的对照组出现交替行为,但尽管强化偶然性存在差异,所有三组受到应激的小鼠在测试中越来越多地表现出坚持行为。这些结果与强化理论的预测不一致,但与以下观点一致:受到应激或唤醒的动物具有新恐惧症,并使用非联想学习(习惯化)来区分新的和熟悉的选择。