Martinez-Harms Maria José, Larraín-Barrios Bárbara, Arregoitia Luis D Verde, Palma-Duque José, Gelcich Stefan
Centro de Innovación e Investigación para el Cambio Climático, Universidad Santo Tomas, Av. Ejército Libertador 146, Santiago, Chile.
Instituto Milenio en Socio-Ecología Costera, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Av. Portugal 49, Santiago, Chile.
Ambio. 2025 Jul;54(7):1109-1127. doi: 10.1007/s13280-025-02139-3. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
Ecosystem service (ES) trade-offs are central to informed decision-making, often requiring the prioritization of some ES over others. This comprehensive review synthesizes insights from over 3000 studies, identifying global patterns and research gaps across terrestrial, marine, and freshwater ecosystems. We highlight significant biases, including a predominant focus on terrestrial ecosystems and provisioning and habitat services, while cultural ES remain critically underrepresented. Regulating ES exhibit notable gaps in marine and freshwater contexts. Research is concentrated in Europe, Asia, and North America, whereas Africa exhibits a more balanced ES approach but remains underrepresented. A key insight is the limited integration of multiple ES categories, with most studies focusing on individual or paired services. Our dataset identifies underrepresented regions and emphasizes the need for region-specific approaches, particularly in marine and freshwater ecosystems. We advocate for interdisciplinary research, methodological transparency, and decision-support frameworks to bridge research gaps and foster equitable ES management.
生态系统服务(ES)权衡是明智决策的核心,通常需要对某些生态系统服务进行优先排序。这篇全面综述综合了3000多项研究的见解,确定了陆地、海洋和淡水生态系统的全球模式和研究差距。我们强调了重大偏差,包括主要关注陆地生态系统以及供给和栖息地服务,而文化生态系统服务的代表性仍然严重不足。调节性生态系统服务在海洋和淡水环境中存在显著差距。研究集中在欧洲、亚洲和北美洲,而非洲虽然对生态系统服务的研究方法更为平衡,但代表性仍然不足。一个关键的见解是多种生态系统服务类别的整合有限,大多数研究集中在单个或成对的服务上。我们的数据集确定了代表性不足的地区,并强调需要采取因地制宜的方法,特别是在海洋和淡水生态系统中。我们主张开展跨学科研究、保持方法透明并建立决策支持框架,以弥合研究差距并促进公平的生态系统服务管理。