• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessment of genetically modified maize DAS1131 (application GMFF-2021-1530).转基因玉米DAS1131的评估(申请GMFF-2021-1530)。
EFSA J. 2025 Mar 19;23(3):e9282. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9282. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Assessment of genetically modified maize DP910521 (application GMFF-2021-2473).转基因玉米DP910521的评估(申请编号GMFF-2021-2473)
EFSA J. 2024 Aug 1;22(8):e8887. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8887. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Assessment of genetically modified maize DP51291 (application GMFF-2021-0071).转基因玉米DP51291的评估(申请GMFF-2021-0071)。
EFSA J. 2024 Nov 11;22(11):e9059. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9059. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
Assessment of genetically modified maize DP915635 for food and feed uses, under regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2020-172).根据(欧盟)第1829/2003号法规(申请编号EFSA-GMO-NL-2020-172)对转基因玉米DP915635进行食品和饲料用途评估。
EFSA J. 2024 Jan 17;22(1):e8490. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8490. eCollection 2024 Jan.
5
Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 94804 (application GMFF-2022-10651).转基因玉米MON 94804的评估(申请编号GMFF-2022-10651)
EFSA J. 2024 Apr 26;22(4):e8714. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8714. eCollection 2024 Apr.
6
Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 95275 (application GMFF-2022-5890).转基因玉米MON 95275的评估(申请GMFF-2022-5890)
EFSA J. 2024 Aug 1;22(8):e8886. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8886. eCollection 2024 Aug.
7
Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 95379 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2020-170).根据(欧盟)第1829/2003号法规(申请编号EFSA-GMO-NL-2020-170)对转基因玉米MON 95379进行食品和饲料用途评估。
EFSA J. 2022 Nov 15;20(11):e07588. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7588. eCollection 2022 Nov.
8
Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 87419 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2017-140).根据(欧盟)第1829/2003号法规(申请编号EFSA-GMO-NL-2017-140)对转基因玉米MON 87419进行食品和饲料用途评估。
EFSA J. 2023 Jan 20;21(1):e07730. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7730. eCollection 2023 Jan.
9
Assessment of genetically modified maize DP23211 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2019-163).根据欧盟委员会第1829/2003号法规(申请编号EFSA-GMO-NL-2019-163)对转基因玉米DP23211进行食品和饲料用途评估。
EFSA J. 2024 Jan 18;22(1):e8483. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8483. eCollection 2024 Jan.
10
Assessment of genetically modified Maize MON 87429 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2019-161).根据欧盟法规(EC)No 1829/2003(申请编号EFSA-GMO-NL-2019-161)对转基因玉米MON 87429进行食品和饲料用途评估。
EFSA J. 2022 Nov 18;20(11):e07589. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7589. eCollection 2022 Nov.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of genetically modified sugar beet KWS20-1 (application GMFF-2023-14732).转基因甜菜KWS20-1的评估(申请GMFF-2023-14732)
EFSA J. 2025 May 12;23(5):e9381. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9381. eCollection 2025 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Reasoned opinion on the review of the existing maximum residue levels (MRLs) for fenpropimorph according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.根据欧盟委员会条例(EC)No 396/2005第12条对粉锈宁现有最大残留限量(MRLs)进行审查的合理意见。
EFSA J. 2015 Mar 18;13(3):4050. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4050. eCollection 2015 Mar.
2
Assessment of genetically modified maize DP51291 (application GMFF-2021-0071).转基因玉米DP51291的评估(申请GMFF-2021-0071)。
EFSA J. 2024 Nov 11;22(11):e9059. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9059. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Assessment of genetically modified Maize MON 87429 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2019-161).根据欧盟法规(EC)No 1829/2003(申请编号EFSA-GMO-NL-2019-161)对转基因玉米MON 87429进行食品和饲料用途评估。
EFSA J. 2022 Nov 18;20(11):e07589. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7589. eCollection 2022 Nov.
4
Abundance and Stability as Common Properties of Allergens.丰富性和稳定性作为变应原的共同特性。
Front Allergy. 2021 Oct 28;2:769728. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2021.769728. eCollection 2021.
5
Update of environmental risk assessment conclusions and risk management recommendations of EFSA (2016) on EU teosinte.欧洲食品安全局(2016年)关于欧盟类蜀黍的环境风险评估结论及风险管理建议的更新
EFSA J. 2022 Apr 1;20(4):e07228. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7228. eCollection 2022 Apr.
6
Characterization of a Glyphosate-Tolerant Enzyme from : A Distinct Class of 5-Enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate Synthases.来自[具体来源未给出]的草甘膦耐受性酶的特性:一类独特的5-烯醇丙酮酰莽草酸-3-磷酸合酶
J Agric Food Chem. 2021 May 5;69(17):5096-5104. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c00439. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
7
Statement on protein digestibility tests in allergenicity and protein safety assessment of genetically modified plants.关于转基因植物致敏性和蛋白质安全性评估中蛋白质消化率测试的声明。
EFSA J. 2021 Jan 12;19(1):e06350. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6350. eCollection 2021 Jan.
8
Scientific Opinion on application EFSA-GMO-NL-2016-132 for authorisation of genetically modified of insect-resistant and herbicide-tolerant soybean DAS-81419-2 × DAS-44406-6 for food and feed uses, import and processing submitted in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 by Dow Agrosciences LCC.欧洲食品安全局转基因生物小组对陶氏益农有限责任公司依据(欧盟)第1829/2003号法规提交的抗虫耐除草剂转基因大豆DAS-81419-2×DAS-44406-6用于食品、饲料、进口和加工的授权申请(申请编号:EFSA-GMO-NL-2016-132)的科学意见
EFSA J. 2020 Nov 20;18(11):e06302. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6302. eCollection 2020 Nov.
9
Adaptive introgression from maize has facilitated the establishment of teosinte as a noxious weed in Europe.玉米的适应性基因渐渗使类蜀黍在欧洲成为一种有害杂草。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Oct 13;117(41):25618-25627. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2006633117. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
10
Are Physicochemical Properties Shaping the Allergenic Potency of Plant Allergens?物理化学性质是否在塑造植物过敏原的致敏能力?
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2022 Feb;62(1):37-63. doi: 10.1007/s12016-020-08810-9.

转基因玉米DAS1131的评估(申请GMFF-2021-1530)。

Assessment of genetically modified maize DAS1131 (application GMFF-2021-1530).

作者信息

Casacuberta Josep, Barro Francisco, Braeuning Albert, Cubas Pilar, de Maagd Ruud, Epstein Michelle M, Frenzel Thomas, Gallois Jean-Luc, Koning Frits, Messéan Antoine, Moreno F Javier, Nogué Fabien, Savoini Giovanni, Schulman Alan H, Tebbe Christoph, Veromann Eve, Ardizzone Michele, De Sanctis Giacomo, Dumont Antonio Fernandez, Ferrari Arianna, Gennaro Andrea, Gómez Ruiz José Ángel, Goumperis Tilemachos, Grammatikou Paschalina, Kagkli Dafni Maria, Lenzi Paolo, Lewandowska Aleksandra, Camargo Ana M, Neri Franco Maria, Piffanelli Pietro, Raffaello Tommaso

出版信息

EFSA J. 2025 Mar 19;23(3):e9282. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9282. eCollection 2025 Mar.

DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9282
PMID:40109670
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11920813/
Abstract

Genetically modified maize DAS1131 was developed to confer resistance to certain susceptible lepidopteran pests, as well as tolerance to glyphosate herbicide, these properties were achieved by introducing the and expression cassettes. The molecular characterisation data and bioinformatic analyses do not identify issues requiring food/feed safety assessment. None of the identified differences in the agronomic/phenotypic and compositional characteristics tested between maize DAS1131 and its conventional counterpart needs further assessment, except for crude fat in grain which does not raise safety and nutritional concerns. The Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO Panel) does not identify safety concerns regarding the toxicity and allergenicity of the Cry1Da2 and DGT-28 EPSPS proteins as expressed in maize DAS1131 and finds no evidence that the genetic modification would change the overall allergenicity of maize DAS1131. In the context of this application, the consumption of food and feed from maize DAS1131 does not represent a nutritional concern in humans and animals. The GMO Panel concludes that maize DAS1131 is as safe as the conventional counterpart and the non-GM maize varieties tested, and no post-market monitoring of food/feed is considered necessary. In the case of release of maize DAS1131 into the environment, including viable grains, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post-market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of maize DAS1131. The GMO Panel concludes that maize DAS1131 is as safe as its conventional counterpart and the tested non-GM maize varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.

摘要

转基因玉米DAS1131旨在获得对某些易感鳞翅目害虫的抗性以及对草甘膦除草剂的耐受性,这些特性通过导入 和 表达盒实现。分子特征数据和生物信息学分析未发现需要进行食品/饲料安全性评估的问题。除了籽粒中的粗脂肪不会引发安全性和营养方面的担忧外,玉米DAS1131与其传统对照品种在农艺学/表型和成分特征方面所检测到的差异均无需进一步评估。转基因生物小组(GMO小组)未发现玉米DAS1131中表达的Cry1Da2和DGT - 28 EPSPS蛋白的毒性和致敏性存在安全问题,也没有证据表明基因改造会改变玉米DAS1131的整体致敏性。在此申请的背景下,食用玉米DAS1131的食品和饲料对人类和动物不构成营养方面的担忧。GMO小组得出结论,玉米DAS1131与传统对照品种以及所测试的非转基因玉米品种一样安全,无需对食品/饲料进行上市后监测。如果将玉米DAS1131释放到环境中,包括有活力的籽粒,这不会引发环境安全问题。上市后环境监测计划和报告间隔符合玉米DAS1131的预期用途。GMO小组得出结论,就对人类和动物健康以及环境的潜在影响而言,玉米DAS1131与其传统对照品种以及所测试的非转基因玉米品种一样安全。