• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较应力应变指数版本1和版本2在正常人和圆锥角膜患者中的表现。

Comparing the Performance of Stress-Strain Index Versions 1 and 2 in Normal and Keratoconus Patients.

作者信息

Lu Nan-Ji, Jiménez-García Marta, Elsheikh Ahmed, Makarem Ahmed, Koppen Carina, Rozema Jos J

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Visual Optics Lab Antwerp (VOLANTIS), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.

出版信息

Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2025 Mar 3;14(3):23. doi: 10.1167/tvst.14.3.23.

DOI:10.1167/tvst.14.3.23
PMID:40136291
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11951061/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of the Stress-Strain Index versions 1 and 2 (SSI and SSI2) in healthy patients and patients with keratoconus (KC).

METHODS

Fifty-two healthy and 104 KC eyes were examined using Scheimpflug-based tomography and air-puff tonometry (Pentacam and Corvis). Correlations between both versions of SSI and age, thinnest pachymetry, and tomographic parameters were assessed. To discriminate KC eyes from healthy eyes, receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to calculate the area under the curve (AUC) for both versions of SSI and compared with a Delong test.

RESULTS

Both versions of SSI showed statistical differences between the healthy group and the group of patients with KC (all P < 0.001). In the healthy group, significant correlations were found between both versions of SSI and age, K1, K2, and Kmax, between SSI and average relational thickness (ART) Max (R2 = 0.23) and between SSI2 and Belin A (R2 = 0.08). In the KC group, significant correlations were found between both versions of SSI and all tomographic parameters (all P < 0.01, except for SSI2 with age P = 0.346); the R2 values in SSI2 were consistently higher than in SSI. AUC for SSI and SSI2 when comparing normal and KC eyes was 0.772 and 0.740, respectively (P = 0.468).

CONCLUSIONS

Both versions of SSI correlated with tomographic parameters describing KC severity, but correlations were higher for SSI2 and were not affected by age. Both versions demonstrated the same diagnostic ability for KC.

TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE

Both versions of SSI are not interchangeable, SSI2 may be preferred to depict the corneal stiffness.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较应力应变指数1版和2版(SSI和SSI2)在健康患者和圆锥角膜(KC)患者中的表现。

方法

使用基于Scheimpflug的断层扫描和气流眼压计(Pentacam和Corvis)对52只健康眼睛和104只KC眼睛进行检查。评估了两个版本的SSI与年龄、最薄角膜厚度以及断层扫描参数之间的相关性。为了区分KC眼睛和健康眼睛,生成了受试者操作特征曲线,以计算两个版本的SSI的曲线下面积(AUC),并通过Delong检验进行比较。

结果

两个版本的SSI在健康组和KC患者组之间均显示出统计学差异(所有P < 0.001)。在健康组中,两个版本的SSI与年龄、K1、K2和Kmax之间存在显著相关性,SSI与平均相对厚度(ART)Max之间存在显著相关性(R2 = 0.23),SSI2与Belin A之间存在显著相关性(R2 = 0.08)。在KC组中,两个版本的SSI与所有断层扫描参数之间均存在显著相关性(除SSI2与年龄P = 0.346外,所有P < 0.01);SSI2中的R2值始终高于SSI。比较正常眼睛和KC眼睛时,SSI和SSI2的AUC分别为0.772和0.740(P = 0.468)。

结论

两个版本的SSI均与描述KC严重程度的断层扫描参数相关,但SSI2的相关性更高且不受年龄影响。两个版本对KC均具有相同的诊断能力。

转化相关性

两个版本的SSI不可互换,SSI2可能更适合描述角膜硬度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bc4/11951061/8dbf7571ebd0/tvst-14-3-23-f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bc4/11951061/61994ab7f24c/tvst-14-3-23-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bc4/11951061/9e293fa72cfd/tvst-14-3-23-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bc4/11951061/bd9f9152a3d6/tvst-14-3-23-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bc4/11951061/8dbf7571ebd0/tvst-14-3-23-f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bc4/11951061/61994ab7f24c/tvst-14-3-23-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bc4/11951061/9e293fa72cfd/tvst-14-3-23-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bc4/11951061/bd9f9152a3d6/tvst-14-3-23-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bc4/11951061/8dbf7571ebd0/tvst-14-3-23-f004.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing the Performance of Stress-Strain Index Versions 1 and 2 in Normal and Keratoconus Patients.比较应力应变指数版本1和版本2在正常人和圆锥角膜患者中的表现。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2025 Mar 3;14(3):23. doi: 10.1167/tvst.14.3.23.
2
Application of a scheimpflug-based biomechanical analyser and tomography in the early detection of subclinical keratoconus in chinese patients.基于 Scheimpflug 技术的生物力学分析和断层成像在中国人亚临床圆锥角膜早期检测中的应用。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep 20;21(1):339. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-02102-2.
3
[Characteristics of corneal topography in parents of keratoconus patients].[圆锥角膜患者父母的角膜地形图特征]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Jun 11;56(6):456-464. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20191008-00200.
4
Parental Corneal Tomographic and Biomechanical Characteristics of Patients With Keratoconus.圆锥角膜患者的父母角膜断层和生物力学特征。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2023 Dec;256:146-155. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.08.004. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
5
Combined corneal biomechanical and tomographical indices in subclinical and forme fruste keratoconus.亚临床及早期圆锥角膜的角膜生物力学及断层影像学综合指标。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep 1;72(9):1337-1345. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_766_24. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
6
Diagnostic Ability of Corneal Shape and Biomechanical Parameters for Detecting Frank Keratoconus.角膜形态和生物力学参数对检测典型圆锥角膜的诊断能力。
Cornea. 2018 Aug;37(8):1025-1034. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001639.
7
Objective and subjective diagnostic parameters in the fellow eye of unilateral keratoconus.单眼角膜圆锥角膜对侧眼的客观和主观诊断参数。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct 6;17(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0584-2.
8
Comparison of Corneal Dynamic and Tomographic Analysis in Normal, Forme Fruste Keratoconic, and Keratoconic Eyes.正常眼、顿挫型圆锥角膜眼和圆锥角膜眼中角膜动态与断层分析的比较
J Refract Surg. 2017 Sep 1;33(9):632-638. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20170621-09.
9
Biomechanical responses of healthy and keratoconic corneas measured using a noncontact scheimpflug-based tonometer.使用非接触式 Scheimpflug 眼压计测量健康和圆锥角膜的生物力学反应。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 May 15;55(6):3651-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13715.
10
Correlation Between Corneal Biomechanical Indices and the Severity of Keratoconus.角膜生物力学指标与圆锥角膜严重程度的相关性。
Cornea. 2020 Feb;39(2):215-221. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002129.

本文引用的文献

1
The KERATO Biomechanics Study 1: A Comparative Evaluation Using Brillouin Microscopy and Dynamic Scheimpflug Imaging.《角膜生物力学研究 1:应用布里渊显微镜和动态 Scheimpflug 成像的比较评估》。
J Refract Surg. 2024 Aug;40(8):e569-e578. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20240701-02. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
2
Performance of Corvis ST Parameters Including Updated Stress-Strain Index in Differentiating Between Normal, Forme-Fruste, Subclinical, and Clinical Keratoconic Eyes.Corvis ST 参数在区分正常、未定型、亚临床和临床圆锥角膜眼中的表现,包括更新的应力度-应变指数。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2024 Feb;258:196-207. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.10.015. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
3
Subclinical Keratoconus Detection and Characterization Using Motion-Tracking Brillouin Microscopy.
使用运动跟踪布里渊显微镜检测和表征亚临床圆锥角膜
Ophthalmology. 2024 Mar;131(3):310-321. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.10.011. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
4
New keratoconus staging system based on OCT.基于 OCT 的新型圆锥角膜分期系统。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023 Nov 1;49(11):1098-1105. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001276.
5
Combinations of Scheimpflug tomography, ocular coherence tomography and air-puff tonometry improve the detection of keratoconus.Scheimpflug 断层成像、眼相干断层成像和空气脉冲眼压测量的联合应用提高了圆锥角膜的检出率。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2023 Jun;46(3):101840. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2023.101840. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
6
Motion-Tracking Brillouin Microscopy Evaluation of Normal, Keratoconic, and Post-Laser Vision Correction Corneas.运动跟踪布里渊显微镜评估正常、圆锥角膜和激光视力矫正后角膜。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2023 Oct;254:128-140. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.03.018. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
7
Comprehensive Assessment of Corvis ST Biomechanical Indices in Normal and Keratoconus Corneas with Reference to Corneal Enantiomorphism.基于角膜镜像性对正常角膜和圆锥角膜的Corvis ST生物力学指标进行综合评估
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 15;12(2):690. doi: 10.3390/jcm12020690.
8
Clinical Ocular Biomechanics: Where Are We after 20 Years of Progress?临床眼生物力学:历经20年发展,我们如今处于何种境地?
Curr Eye Res. 2023 Feb;48(2):89-104. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2022.2125530. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
9
Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Indices in Distinguishing Between Normal, Very Asymmetric, and Bilateral Keratoconic Eyes.角膜生物力学指标在区分正常、极不对称和双侧圆锥角膜眼中的评估
J Refract Surg. 2022 Jun;38(6):364-372. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20220601-01. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
10
Combining Spectral-Domain OCT and Air-Puff Tonometry Analysis to Diagnose Keratoconus.联合频域光学相干断层扫描与气吹式眼压测量分析诊断圆锥角膜
J Refract Surg. 2022 Jun;38(6):374-380. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20220414-02. Epub 2022 Jun 1.