Wu Di, Zeng Rong, Ye Jianzhou, Huang Hong, Yang Xuesong, Zhao Wenbin, Zhang Peilian, Yang Jianting, Cong Lin, Zhao Lijuan, Wang Jinrong, Zhang Qiongyu
Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 610075, Sichuan, China.
Yunnan Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, Kunming, 650021, Yunnan, China.
Lasers Med Sci. 2025 Apr 3;40(1):172. doi: 10.1007/s10103-025-04427-6.
The importance of spot size in pulsed dye lasers for treatment of rosacea is frequently undervalued. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of 7-mm and 10-mm spot sizes of a 595-nm pulsed dye laser for treating erythematotelangiectatic rosacea.Twenty participants with erythematotelangiectatic rosacea were enrolled and received three treatments at 4-week intervals. The left and right cheeks were treated with a circular beam with diameters of 7 mm and 10 mm, respectively. The pulse duration was 10 ms. Therapeutic energy was adjusted by 5-10% based on the immediate reaction after treatment. The skin type, sex, age, lesion site, erythema severity score, telangiectasia severity score, VISIA percentile score, and clinical photographs were recorded at baseline and at 4-week intervals thereafter. The clinical erythema (CEA) score, patient global assessment (PGA) scale score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, and adverse events were evaluated at 4-week intervals. Two physicians blindly evaluated the results.Significant improvements in CEA and telangiectasia scores, VISIA percentile score, and PGA scores were observed on both sides at 3 months, without significant differences between the left and right cheeks. Participant satisfaction with the right side (10 mm; 90%) was significantly higher than that with the left side (7 mm; 85%). The average pain score (VAS) on the left (4.85 ± 0.81) was significantly higher than that on the right (3.95 ± 1.00).This study demonstrated that a 10-mm-diameter therapeutic beam can safely improve rosacea symptoms. The 10-mm light spot was less painful than the 7-mm light spot and had the same therapeutic efficacy; therefore, it is the optimal choice for rosacea.
光斑大小在脉冲染料激光治疗酒渣鼻中的重要性常常被低估。本研究旨在比较595纳米脉冲染料激光的7毫米和10毫米光斑大小治疗红斑毛细血管扩张型酒渣鼻的疗效。招募了20名红斑毛细血管扩张型酒渣鼻患者,每隔4周接受三次治疗。左右脸颊分别用直径为7毫米和10毫米的圆形光束进行治疗。脉冲持续时间为10毫秒。根据治疗后的即时反应,将治疗能量调整5%-10%。在基线时以及此后每隔4周记录皮肤类型、性别、年龄、病变部位、红斑严重程度评分、毛细血管扩张严重程度评分、VISIA百分位数评分和临床照片。每隔4周评估临床红斑(CEA)评分、患者整体评估(PGA)量表评分、视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分和不良事件。两名医生对结果进行盲法评估。在3个月时,两侧的CEA和毛细血管扩张评分、VISIA百分位数评分和PGA评分均有显著改善,左右脸颊之间无显著差异。参与者对右侧(10毫米;90%)的满意度显著高于左侧(7毫米;85%)。左侧的平均疼痛评分(VAS)(4.85±0.81)显著高于右侧(3.95±1.00)。本研究表明,直径10毫米的治疗光束可安全改善酒渣鼻症状。10毫米光斑比7毫米光斑疼痛程度轻,且具有相同的治疗效果;因此,它是治疗酒渣鼻的最佳选择。