Suppr超能文献

饮食量表的灵活或严格控制:女性中FORCE量表的开发与验证

Flexible or rigid control of eating scale: development and validation of the FORCES in women.

作者信息

Nicholls Kate, Vartanian Lenny R, Faasse Kate, Mills Jennifer S

机构信息

School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, UNSW Sydney, High Street Kensington, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025 Apr 11;22(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12966-025-01746-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many dieters show a pattern of disinhibited eating following a diet violation, and it has been proposed that the nature of their dietary restraint (i.e., whether they are rigid or flexible in their pursuit of dietary control) could prove beneficial in explaining variability in the occurrence of disinhibited eating. However, existing measures of rigid and flexible control do not adequately separate these two styles of dietary restraint.

METHOD

The current studies aim to develop a new scale that more clearly differentiates the constructs of rigid and flexible control of eating. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were used to develop and validate the new scale across three distinct samples of women (total N = 1048).

RESULTS

Factor analysis identified five total factors: three relating to the rigid control of food intake (Strict Behaviours, Negative Emotions, and Worry), and two relating to the flexible control of food intake (Flexible Beliefs and Positive Emotions). The Flexible or Rigid Control of Eating Scale (FORCES) had good internal consistency, a reliable factor structure that replicated across the three samples of women and provided a clear separation between rigid and flexible control.

CONCLUSIONS

The FORCES may allow researchers to explain why some dieters are more likely to engage in disinhibited eating than are others and can be a beneficial step toward addressing the negative consequences of maladaptive dieting behaviour.

摘要

背景

许多节食者在违反节食规定后会出现饮食失控的模式,有人提出,他们饮食限制的本质(即他们在追求饮食控制时是严格还是灵活)可能有助于解释饮食失控发生情况的变异性。然而,现有的严格控制和灵活控制的测量方法并不能充分区分这两种饮食限制方式。

方法

当前的研究旨在开发一种新的量表,以更清晰地区分饮食的严格控制和灵活控制这两种结构。探索性和验证性因素分析被用于在三个不同的女性样本(总样本量N = 1048)中开发和验证新量表。

结果

因素分析确定了五个总体因素:三个与食物摄入的严格控制有关(严格行为、负面情绪和担忧),两个与食物摄入的灵活控制有关(灵活信念和积极情绪)。饮食的灵活或严格控制量表(FORCES)具有良好的内部一致性,其可靠的因素结构在三个女性样本中得到了重复,并在严格控制和灵活控制之间提供了清晰的区分。

结论

FORCES量表可能使研究人员能够解释为什么一些节食者比其他节食者更有可能出现饮食失控的情况,并且可能是朝着解决适应不良节食行为的负面后果迈出的有益一步。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
What is restrained eating and how do we identify it?什么是节制饮食,我们如何识别它?
Appetite. 2020 Dec 1;155:104820. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104820. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
6
The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors.因子数量的碎石检验
Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
9
Flexibility in weight management.体重管理的灵活性。
Eat Behav. 2014 Apr;15(2):218-24. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2014.01.008. Epub 2014 Feb 3.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验