• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

22个国家社会人口群体中乐观情绪的分布情况。

The distribution of optimism across sociodemographic groups in 22 countries.

作者信息

Chen Ying, Kubzansky Laura D, Kim Eric S, Koga Hayami, Shiba Koichiro, Padgett R Noah, Wilkinson Renae, Johnson Byron R, VanderWeele Tyler J

机构信息

Human Flourishing Program, Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Kresge Building, 677 Huntington Avenue, 02115 Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):14553. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77257-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-77257-1
PMID:40307250
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12043849/
Abstract

Prior research (mainly from Western industrialized countries) documents associations between greater dispositional optimism (a generalized expectation that good things will happen) and improved health and well-being. However, less is known about whether and how levels of optimism differ across countries and across sociodemographic groups within different countries. This study presents a cross-national exploration of optimism, and its variations across sociodemographic groups. Using a sample of 202,898 adults from 22 diverse countries, we examined the relationships between optimism and key sociodemographic factors in each country separately, and cross-nationally by pooling results across countries using meta-analytic techniques. Our results suggest that mean optimism levels vary substantially across countries. Optimism also varies significantly across most of the sociodemographic factors included in our analyses. In the pooled results across countries, individuals who are older, female, married, employed, highly educated, attending religious services frequently, and native-born reported higher mean optimism levels. In the country-specific analyses, the sociodemographic variation in optimism differs across countries, indicating diverse societal influences. The findings of this study provide novel insights into the population distribution of optimism and disparities in optimism by sociodemographic groups across countries. This study provides a valuable foundation for future investigations into sociocultural influences that shape optimism.

摘要

先前的研究(主要来自西方工业化国家)记录了更高的性格乐观主义(一种好事将会发生的普遍期望)与健康和幸福改善之间的关联。然而,对于乐观主义水平在不同国家以及不同国家内社会人口群体之间是否存在差异以及如何存在差异,我们所知甚少。本研究对乐观主义及其在社会人口群体中的差异进行了跨国探索。我们使用来自22个不同国家的202,898名成年人的样本,分别考察了每个国家中乐观主义与关键社会人口因素之间的关系,并通过使用元分析技术汇总各国结果进行了跨国分析。我们的结果表明,各国的平均乐观主义水平差异很大。乐观主义在我们分析中纳入的大多数社会人口因素中也存在显著差异。在各国汇总结果中,年龄较大、女性、已婚、就业、受过高等教育、经常参加宗教活动以及本土出生的个体报告的平均乐观主义水平更高。在特定国家的分析中,乐观主义的社会人口差异因国家而异,表明存在不同的社会影响。本研究的结果为乐观主义的人口分布以及各国社会人口群体之间乐观主义的差异提供了新的见解。本研究为未来探讨塑造乐观主义的社会文化影响提供了宝贵的基础。

相似文献

1
The distribution of optimism across sociodemographic groups in 22 countries.22个国家社会人口群体中乐观情绪的分布情况。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):14553. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77257-1.
2
Variations in character involving an orientation to promote good across sociodemographic groups in 22 countries.22个国家中涉及促进社会人口群体间善举导向的性格差异。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):14552. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83539-5.
3
Sociodemographic variation in dispositional forgivingness: a cross-national analysis with 22 countries.性格宽容度的社会人口统计学差异:一项对22个国家的跨国分析。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):12144. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82502-8.
4
When the glass is half full: early life experiences and adult optimism in 22 countries.当杯子半满时:22个国家的早期生活经历与成人乐观主义
Npj Ment Health Res. 2025 Apr 30;4(1):12. doi: 10.1038/s44184-024-00109-3.
5
Sociodemographic variations of belief in life after death across 22 Countries.22个国家中关于死后生命信仰的社会人口统计学差异。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):14310. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83541-x.
6
A cross-national analysis of sociodemographic variation in educational attainment.教育程度社会人口统计学差异的跨国分析。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):13870. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87406-9.
7
A cross-national analysis of sociodemographic variation in suffering across 22 countries.一项对22个国家痛苦状况的社会人口统计学差异的跨国分析。
Commun Med (Lond). 2025 Apr 30;5(1):144. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-00859-x.
8
Demographic variation in charitable giving and helping across 22 countries in the Global Flourishing Study.《全球繁荣研究》中22个国家慈善捐赠与助人行为的人口统计学差异。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):14802. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96009-3.
9
Health-Related Lifestyle Profiles in Healthy Adults: Associations with Sociodemographic Indicators, Dispositional Optimism, and Sense of Coherence.健康成年人的与健康相关的生活方式特征:与社会人口学指标、性格乐观和整体感的关联。
Nutrients. 2021 Oct 25;13(11):3778. doi: 10.3390/nu13113778.
10
International optimism: Correlates and consequences of dispositional optimism across 61 countries.国际乐观主义:61 个国家中性格乐观主义的相关性和后果。
J Pers. 2021 Apr;89(2):288-304. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12582. Epub 2020 Aug 30.

本文引用的文献

1
The development of the Global Flourishing Study questionnaire: charting the evolution of a new 109-item inventory of human flourishing.全球繁荣研究问卷的开发:勾勒一份新的109项人类繁荣量表的演变历程。
BMC Glob Public Health. 2025 Apr 30;3(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s44263-025-00139-9.
2
Analytic methodology for childhood predictor analyses for wave 1 of the Global Flourishing Study.全球繁荣研究第一波儿童预测因素分析的分析方法。
BMC Glob Public Health. 2025 Apr 30;3(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s44263-025-00142-0.
3
Analytic methodology for demographic variation analyses for wave 1 of the global flourishing study.全球繁荣研究第一波人口统计学变异分析的分析方法。
BMC Glob Public Health. 2025 Apr 30;3(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s44263-025-00140-2.
4
Survey sampling design in wave 1 of the Global Flourishing Study.全球繁荣研究第一阶段的调查抽样设计。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2025 Mar 27. doi: 10.1007/s10654-024-01167-9.
5
Rational Optimism.理性乐观主义。
Philosophia (Ramat Gan). 2024;52(3):757-778. doi: 10.1007/s11406-024-00758-w. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
6
Increases in Depression, Self-Harm, and Suicide Among U.S. Adolescents After 2012 and Links to Technology Use: Possible Mechanisms.2012年后美国青少年抑郁、自我伤害和自杀行为的增加及其与科技使用的关联:可能的机制
Psychiatr Res Clin Pract. 2020 Sep 9;2(1):19-25. doi: 10.1176/appi.prcp.20190015. eCollection 2020 Summer.
7
National Data on Age Gradients in Well-being Among US Adults.美国成年人幸福感年龄梯度的全国数据。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 1;79(10):1046-1047. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.2473.
8
Summary Measures of Health Inequality: A Review of Existing Measures and Their Application.健康不平等综合衡量指标:现有指标及其应用综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 20;19(6):3697. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063697.
9
Global Trends of Mean and Inequality in Multidimensional Wellbeing: Analysis of 1.2 Million Individuals From 162 Countries, 2009-2019.全球多维福祉均值和不平等趋势:2009-2019 年来自 162 个国家/地区的 120 万人分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 14;10:824960. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.824960. eCollection 2022.
10
Mental health in people with minority sexual orientations: A meta-analysis of population-based studies.性取向少数群体的心理健康:基于人群研究的荟萃分析。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2022 Apr;145(4):357-372. doi: 10.1111/acps.13405. Epub 2022 Feb 11.