Ye Zi-Piao, Yang Xiao-Long, Ye Zi-Wu-Yin, An Ting, Duan Shi-Hua, Kang Hua-Jing, Wang Fu-Biao
New Quality Productivity Research Center, Guangdong ATV College of Performing Arts, Deqing, China.
Institute of Biophysics, Math & Physics College, Jinggangshan University, Ji'an, China.
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Apr 29;16:1575217. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1575217. eCollection 2025.
Accurate determination of photosynthetic parameters is essential for understanding how plants respond to environmental changes. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the Farquhar-von Caemmerer-Berry (FvCB) model and introduced a novel model to fit photosynthetic rates against ambient CO concentration ( ) and intercellular CO concentration ( ) curves for and under 2% and 21% O conditions. We observed significant discrepancies in the FvCB model's fitting capacity for and curves across different oxygen regimes, particularly in estimates of key parameters such as the maximum carboxylation rate ( ), the day respiratory rate ( ), and the maximum electron transport rate for carbon assimilation ( ). Notably, under 2% and 21% O conditions, the values of and derived from curves using the FvCB model were 46.98%, 44.37%, 46.63%, and 37.66% lower than those from curves for , and 47.10%, 44.30%, 47.03%, and 37.36% lower for , respectively. These results highlight that the FvCB model yields significantly different and values when fitting versus curves for these two C plants. In contrast, the novel model demonstrated superior fitting capabilities for both and curves under 2% and 21% O conditions, achieving high determination coefficients ( ≥ 0.989). Key parameters such as the maximum net photosynthetic rate ( ) and the CO compensation point () in the presence of , showed no significant differences across oxygen concentrations. However, the apparent photorespiratory rate ( ) and photorespiratory rate ( ) derived from curves consistently exceeded those from curves for both plant species. Furthermore, values derived from curves closely matched observed values, suggesting that curves more accurately reflect the physiological state of plants, particularly for estimating photorespiratory rates. This study underscores the importance of selecting appropriate CO-response curves to investigate plant photosynthesis and photorespiration under diverse environmental conditions, thereby ensuring a more accurate understanding of plant responses to changing environments.
准确测定光合参数对于理解植物如何响应环境变化至关重要。在本研究中,我们评估了Farquhar-von Caemmerer-Berry(FvCB)模型的性能,并引入了一种新模型来拟合在2%和21%氧气条件下C3和C4植物光合速率与环境CO2浓度(Ca)和胞间CO2浓度(Ci)的曲线。我们观察到,在不同氧气条件下,FvCB模型对C3和C4曲线的拟合能力存在显著差异,特别是在关键参数的估计上,如最大羧化速率(Vcmax)、日间呼吸速率(Rd)和碳同化的最大电子传递速率(Jmax)。值得注意的是,在2%和21%氧气条件下,使用FvCB模型从C3曲线得出的Vcmax和Jmax值分别比从C4曲线得出的值低46.98%、44.37%、46.63%和37.66%,对于C4植物则分别低47.10%、44.30%、47.03%和37.36%。这些结果表明,当为这两种C植物拟合C3与C4曲线时,FvCB模型得出的Vcmax和Jmax值有显著差异。相比之下,新模型在2%和21%氧气条件下对C3和C4曲线均表现出卓越的拟合能力,决定系数较高(R2≥0.989)。在有O2存在时,最大净光合速率(Pnmax)和CO2补偿点(Γ*)等关键参数在不同氧气浓度下无显著差异。然而,对于两种植物,从C3曲线得出的表观光呼吸速率(Rp)和光呼吸速率(Pr)始终超过从C4曲线得出的值。此外,从C3曲线得出的Γ*值与观测值紧密匹配,这表明C3曲线能更准确地反映植物的生理状态,特别是在估计光呼吸速率方面。本研究强调了选择合适的CO2响应曲线来研究不同环境条件下植物光合作用和光呼吸的重要性,从而确保更准确地理解植物对变化环境的响应。