Cromhout Amanda, Schutte Lusilda, Wissing Marié P, Wilson Fadiji Angelina, Guse Tharina, Mbowa Sonia
Africa Unit for Transdisciplinary Health Research (AUTHeR), Faculty of Health Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.
Department of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Education, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Afr J Psychol Assess. 2023 Feb 28;5:122. doi: 10.4102/ajopa.v5i0.122. eCollection 2023.
Harmony is regarded as important for well-being in many cultures. However, (cultural) differences in the meanings and manifestations of harmony may impact the equivalence of measures of harmony in life, as well as the associations between harmony and other well-being constructs. This study aimed to investigate the factorial, convergent and divergent validity, and measurement invariance of the Harmony in Life Scale (HILS) in South African and Ghanaian samples. Confirmatory factor analysis was applied to data from three South African samples (two multicultural samples completed the HILS in English; and a Setswana-speaking sample completed the HILS in Setswana) and one Ghanaian sample (completed the HILS in English). Sample sizes ranged between = 400 and = 427. Good fit indices were obtained for all samples, except for the Setswana-speaking sample from South Africa. In all instances the HILS showed good internal consistency reliability and convergent and divergent validity. Full scalar invariance was supported for the two multicultural South African samples, but only partial scalar invariance when data from the Ghanaian sample were added to the analysis. The HILS shows potential for future use in all samples, except the Setswana-speaking sample. Findings emphasise the importance of considering cultural and/or contextual and linguistic differences and how these may influence the measurement of psychological constructs. Future research should qualitatively explore the meanings and manifestations of harmony in various African and other global contexts in local languages.
This study is the first to investigate the psychometric properties of the original English version of the HILS in South African and Ghanaian samples, as well as a Setswana translation of the scale. The study contributes to the understanding of harmony in life and the measurement thereof in diverse contexts, in this case specifically focused on African samples, and may, in turn, inform interventions and evaluation of interventions.
在许多文化中,和谐被视为幸福安康的重要因素。然而,和谐在意义和表现形式上的(文化)差异可能会影响生活中和谐度量的等效性,以及和谐与其他幸福安康概念之间的关联。本研究旨在调查南非和加纳样本中生活和谐量表(HILS)的因子效度、聚合效度和区分效度以及测量不变性。验证性因子分析应用于来自三个南非样本(两个多文化样本用英语完成HILS;一个说塞茨瓦纳语的样本用塞茨瓦纳语完成HILS)和一个加纳样本(用英语完成HILS)的数据。样本量在n = 400至n = 427之间。除了来自南非的说塞茨瓦纳语的样本外,所有样本都获得了良好的拟合指数。在所有情况下,HILS都显示出良好的内部一致性信度以及聚合效度和区分效度。两个多文化南非样本支持完全标量不变性,但当将加纳样本的数据加入分析时,仅支持部分标量不变性。HILS在除说塞茨瓦纳语的样本外的所有样本中都显示出未来使用的潜力。研究结果强调了考虑文化和/或背景及语言差异以及这些差异如何影响心理结构测量的重要性。未来的研究应该用当地语言定性地探索和谐在各种非洲和其他全球背景下 的意义和表现形式。
本研究首次调查了HILS原始英文版本在南非和加纳样本以及该量表的塞茨瓦纳语翻译版本的心理测量特性。该研究有助于理解生活中的和谐及其在不同背景下的测量,在本案例中特别关注非洲样本,进而可能为干预措施及干预效果评估提供参考。