Zheng Shimei, Li Yongchao, Chen Cuihong, Wang Naiyu, Yang Fengxia
College of Chemistry and Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Weifang University, Weifang 261061, China.
School of Environment and Natural Resources, Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China.
Toxics. 2025 Apr 27;13(5):348. doi: 10.3390/toxics13050348.
While the application of antibiotics in livestock production has undeniably propelled the rapid growth of animal husbandry, the escalating crisis of antimicrobial resistance stemming from antibiotic use poses significant threats to global public health and sustainable agricultural development. To address this critical challenge, multifaceted strategies have been implemented through coordinated policy interventions and scientific innovations. This review systematically examines two pivotal dimensions: (1) evolving regulatory frameworks governing antibiotic usage and (2) emerging non-antibiotic alternatives, with a particular focus on their implementation mechanisms and technological maturation. The analysis of transnational antibiotic governance encompasses comparative policy evolution in the European Union, the United States, and China. These regulatory paradigms address critical control points including registration management policies, usage monitoring systems, and integrated surveillance programs. Concerning technological alternatives, six categories of antibiotic substitutes are critically evaluated: Chinese herbal formulations, plant-derived essential oils, antimicrobial peptides, microecological agents, acidifiers, and enzyme preparations. These solutions are functionally categorized into prophylactic agents (enhancing disease resilience) and zootechnical additives (optimizing feed efficiency). These antibiotic alternatives demonstrate certain efficacy in alleviating the challenges of antibiotic overuse, yet they still face multiple implementation barriers. Further investigations are warranted to establish standardized efficacy evaluation protocols and conduct technoeconomic feasibility assessments under commercial-scale production conditions. Ultimately, resolving the antibiotic dilemma requires synergistic collaboration between regulatory bodies, pharmaceutical innovators, and academic researchers. This work emphasizes the crucial interplay between evidence-based policymaking and technological advancement in shaping sustainable livestock production systems.
虽然抗生素在畜牧业生产中的应用无疑推动了畜牧业的快速发展,但抗生素使用引发的日益严重的抗菌药物耐药性危机对全球公共卫生和农业可持续发展构成了重大威胁。为应对这一严峻挑战,已通过协调政策干预和科学创新实施了多方面的策略。本综述系统地审视了两个关键层面:(1)不断演变的抗生素使用监管框架,以及(2)新兴的非抗生素替代品,特别关注其实施机制和技术成熟度。对跨国抗生素治理的分析涵盖了欧盟、美国和中国的比较政策演变。这些监管范式涉及关键控制点,包括注册管理政策、使用监测系统和综合监测计划。关于技术替代方案,对六类抗生素替代品进行了严格评估:中草药制剂、植物源精油、抗菌肽、微生态制剂、酸化剂和酶制剂。这些解决方案在功能上分为预防剂(增强疾病抵抗力)和畜牧添加剂(优化饲料效率)。这些抗生素替代品在缓解抗生素过度使用的挑战方面显示出一定的效果,但它们仍然面临多重实施障碍。有必要进一步开展研究,以建立标准化的疗效评估方案,并在商业规模生产条件下进行技术经济可行性评估。最终,解决抗生素困境需要监管机构、制药创新者和学术研究人员之间的协同合作。这项工作强调了循证决策与技术进步在塑造可持续畜牧生产系统中的关键相互作用。