Ertugrul Busra, Dullat Jaspreet Kaur, McDonnell Therese, O'Dowd Marcella, McAuliffe Eilish
UCD IRIS Centre, School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
National Quality and Patient Safety, Health Service Executive, Dublin 8, Ireland.
PLoS One. 2025 May 29;20(5):e0321720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321720. eCollection 2025.
Patient harm as a result of unsafe care remains a growing global health concern, and traditional efforts prioritising tracking errors and voluntary reporting to detect adverse events result in very low error detection rates. In attempting to address this, some countries have developed patient safety surveillance systems where several data sources are combined and interrogated to detect errors and deterioration as well as to highlight good practices. The development of such systems requires overcoming various technological, executive, financial, political, and behavioral challenges. The process of developing quality and safety surveillance systems is an important one that is worthy of research that enables the sharing of learning with countries embarking on the development of such a system.
This is the protocol of the realist review that aims to develop a programme theory that explores the underlying mechanisms and processes for developing a quality and safety surveillance system in healthcare settings.
This paper presents the research protocol for the quality and safety surveillance system development. The realist synthesis method will be used to synthesize the evidence in the literature.
Initial programme theory will be developed based on a literature review, stakeholder consultations with the programme designers and developers, project meetings, the theory of change model that underpins the programme, and an understanding of systems theory to identify the context and mechanisms that cause quality and safety surveillance systems to succeed or fail in general healthcare settings. Three-phase iterative searches of PubMed, PsycInfo, Central, CINAHL, and Grey literature will be conducted. The studies in any setting and for any patient group will be included. The snowball technique will also be used to search the reference list of the related studies. The search period ranges from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2023. Results will be reported following RAMESES and PRISMA-ScR guidelines.
不安全护理导致的患者伤害仍是全球日益严重的健康问题,传统上优先跟踪错误并通过自愿报告来检测不良事件的做法导致错误检测率极低。为解决这一问题,一些国家开发了患者安全监测系统,将多个数据源整合并进行分析,以检测错误和病情恶化情况,并突出良好做法。开发此类系统需要克服各种技术、行政、财务、政治和行为方面的挑战。质量和安全监测系统的开发过程是一个重要的研究课题,有助于与正在开发此类系统的国家分享经验教训。
这是一项现实主义综述的方案,旨在构建一个项目理论,探索在医疗环境中开发质量和安全监测系统的潜在机制和过程。
本文介绍了质量和安全监测系统开发的研究方案。将采用现实主义综合方法对文献中的证据进行综合。
基于文献综述、与项目设计者和开发者的利益相关者协商、项目会议、支撑该项目的变革理论模型以及对系统理论的理解,初步构建项目理论,以确定在一般医疗环境中导致质量和安全监测系统成功或失败的背景和机制。将对PubMed、PsycInfo、Central、CINAHL和灰色文献进行三阶段迭代检索。将纳入任何环境下针对任何患者群体的研究。还将使用滚雪球技术搜索相关研究的参考文献列表。检索时间段为2000年1月1日至2023年12月31日。将按照RAMESES和PRISMA-ScR指南报告结果。