Amele Sarah, Kibuchi Eliud, McCabe Ronan, Demou Evangelia, Leyland Alastair H, Hainey Kirsten, Rudan Igor, Kurdi Amanj, Simpson Colin R, Ritchie Lewis D, McCowan Colin, Shi Ting, Irizar Patricia, Becares Laia, Sheikh Aziz, Pearce Anna, Katikireddi Srinivasa Vittal
MRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Eur J Public Health. 2025 Aug 1;35(4):788-794. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaf078.
We quantified the extent to which socio-economic position (SEP) contributed to ethnic inequalities in severe COVID-19 outcomes (hospitalization or death) in Scotland. We used linked 2011 Scottish Census and health records to assess whether ethnic inequalities were mediated by different SEP measures: area deprivation, educational status, household composition, and multigenerational household. We considered disaggregated ethnicities 'White Scottish', 'White British or Irish', 'Other White', 'South Asian', 'African, Caribbean, or Black', and 'Other'. We applied marginal structural models to estimate causal pathways. Of the 3 297 205 individuals analysed, 38 213 (1.2%) had severe COVID-19 outcomes. South Asians had elevated risk of severe COVID-19 compared to White Scottish (hazard ratio: 1.7; 95% confidence interval: 1.5-1.9), while White British or Irish (hazard ratio: 0.7; confidence interval: 0.6-08) and other White (hazard ratio: 0.8; confidence interval: 0.7-0.9) had reduced risk. When holding area deprivation constant, the risk of severe COVID-19 declined by 16.5% for South Asians and 49.2% for White British or Irish; but increased for other White (75.4%). When holding education constant, the risk of severe COVID-19 reduced by 24.8% for White British or Irish and 20.6% for other White; but increased by 74.6% for South Asians. Only a slight change in risk was observed for the South Asians after holding household size and multigenerational household constant. Risk estimates for African, Caribbean or Black, and other groups were underpowered. SEP measures differed substantially in the extent to which they mediated ethnic inequalities in severe COVID-19. This highlights the necessity of addressing multiple dimensions of SEP that drive ethnic inequalities.
我们对社会经济地位(SEP)在苏格兰严重新冠疫情结果(住院或死亡)的种族不平等中所起作用的程度进行了量化。我们利用2011年苏格兰人口普查与健康记录的关联数据,评估种族不平等是否由不同的SEP指标所介导:地区贫困程度、教育状况、家庭构成以及多代同堂家庭情况。我们考虑了细分的种族:“苏格兰白人”“英国或爱尔兰白人”“其他白人”“南亚人”“非洲、加勒比或黑人”以及“其他”。我们应用边际结构模型来估计因果路径。在分析的3297205个人中,38213人(1.2%)出现了严重新冠疫情结果。与苏格兰白人相比,南亚人出现严重新冠疫情的风险更高(风险比:1.7;95%置信区间:1.5 - 1.9),而英国或爱尔兰白人(风险比:0.7;置信区间:0.6 - 0.8)和其他白人(风险比:0.8;置信区间:0.7 - 0.9)的风险则较低。当地区贫困程度保持不变时,南亚人出现严重新冠疫情的风险下降了16.5%,英国或爱尔兰白人下降了49.2%;但其他白人的风险增加了(75.4%)。当教育状况保持不变时,英国或爱尔兰白人出现严重新冠疫情的风险降低了24.8%,其他白人降低了20.6%;但南亚人的风险增加了74.6%。在家庭规模和多代同堂家庭情况保持不变后,南亚人的风险仅出现了轻微变化。非洲、加勒比或黑人以及其他群体的风险估计因样本量不足而缺乏说服力。SEP指标在介导严重新冠疫情种族不平等的程度上存在显著差异。这凸显了解决驱动种族不平等的SEP多个维度问题的必要性。